A comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for overweight patients in Bangkok Metropolitan Administration General Hospital: a retrospective study

Main Article Content

Supakit Chartchaiyarerk
Surapong Sungtra

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the result of appendicitis treatment between laparoscopic surgery (LA) and open surgery (OA) in overweight patient. In term of hospital length of stay (LOS), intraoperative time, time to resume diet and postoperative complications.


Methods: A retrospective study by reviewing medical records of overweight patients (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) in Bangkok Metropolitan Administration General Hospital with acute appendicitis who underwent LA and OA from January 2012 through December 2017. The data included personal information, intraoperative details, postoperative details and the data of those was analyzed and was compared between open and laparoscopic surgery.


Results: There were 136 (71 male, 65 female) overweight patients underwent appendectomy. Subjects were divided into 2 groups; 68 in LA and 68 in OA. Median length of stay (LOS) for LA was better, 58.5 hours versus 85.5 hours for OA (P < 0.01), median operative blood loss for LA was better, 5 ml versus 20 ml for OA (P < 0.01) and primary wound closure rate was better, 100% for LA versus 85% for OA (P = 0.001). Other outcome measures were equivalent.


Conclusion: LA can be performed safely with shorter LOS, less delayed primary wound closure and less operative blood loss in overweight patients and should be considered the procedure of choice for overweight patients with appendicitis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chartchaiyarerk, S., & Sungtra, S. (2020). A comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for overweight patients in Bangkok Metropolitan Administration General Hospital: a retrospective study. Vajira Medical Journal : Journal of Urban Medicine, 64(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.14456/vmj.2020.17
Section
Original Articles

References

Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemio 1990;132:910-25.

Thomas CG, Jr. Experiences with Early Operative Interference in Cases of Disease of the Vermiform Appendix by Charles McBurney, M.D., Visiting Surgeon to the Roosevelt Hospital, New York City. Rev Surg 1969;26:153-66.

Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15:59-64.

Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, et al. Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Ann Surg 2008;248:800-6.

Paterson H, Qadan M, De Luca S, Nixon S, Paterson‐Brown S. Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2008;95:363-8.

Van Hove C, Hardiman K, Diggs B, Deveney C, Sheppard B. Demographic and socioeconomic trends in the use of laparoscopic appendectomy from 1997 to 2003. Am J Surg 2008;195:580-3.

Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;11.

Ciarrocchi A, Amicucci G. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in obese patients: A meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies. J Minim Access Surg 2014;10:4-9.

Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Wikholm L, Naderi N, Mills Smetv, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population. Ame J Surg 2011;202:733-9.

Tiwari, MM, Reynosa JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 2011, 254: 927-32.

Dasari, BVM, Baker J, Marker S, Gradiner K. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int Journal Surg 2015;13: 250-56.

Clark T, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Cheng BC, Olasky J, Sohn HJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1276-80.

Taguchi Y, Komatsu S, Sakamoto E, Norimizu S, Shingu Y, Hasegawa H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2016;30:1705-12.

Corneille MG, Steigelman MB, Myers JG, Jundt J, Dent DL, Lopez PP, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients. Am J Surg 2007;194:877-81.

Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 2008;196:218-22.

Tan-Tam C, Yorke E, Wasdell M, Barcan C, Konkin D, Blair P. The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomies in obese patients. Am J Surg 2012;203:609-12.

World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight [internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 8]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/

WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157-63.

Antonio B, Carla DS, Francesco F, Angelo B, Marco V, Luigi P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness. World J Emer Surg 2016;11:1-6.

Dai L, Shuai J.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. United European Gastroenterol J 2017;5:542-53.

Zhang S, Du T, Jiang X, Song C. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27:262–6.

Athanasiou C, Lockwood S, Markides GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: an update of the literature. World J Surg 2017;41:3083–99.

Takami T, Yamaguchi T, Yoshitake H, Hatano K, Kataoka N, Tomita M, et al. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019;1-5.