The Prevalence and Correlation between Degenerative Change of Cervical and Lumbar Spine

Main Article Content

Kitjapat Tirachanvut
Thipthara Tarathipayakul
Pumibal Wetpiriyakul

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of degenerative changes in the cervical and lumbar spine and its correlation.


Material and methods: The medical records and Magnetic resonance images of patients (Age >40 years) attending Vajira Hospital over a 5-year period (2014-2019) were reviewed for the prevalence, type and location of Modic changes (MCs). The degree of vertebral degeneration was assessed on a MCs for each level of cervical and lumbar spine. The patients were divided into two groups based on the MCs for each spinal level: absence (Modic type 0), presence (Modic type 1-3).


Results: 50 patients met the inclusion criteria. The MCs of cervical and lumbar spine were present in 64% and 54% respectively. The prevalence of MCs at C5 (34%) was the most common in the cervical spine. The highest prevalence of MCs in the lumbar spine was identified at L3 (46%). There was no significant difference in MCs between the cervical and lumbar spine. In patient with present of MCs in lumbar spine, we found 70.37% present of MCs in cervical spine.


Conclusions: More than 50% of patients over 50 years of age have MCs. There is no significant difference in MCs between the cervical and lumbar spine. However, patient with positive MCs in lumbar spine tend to present with positive MCs than lumbar negative MCs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tirachanvut, K., Tarathipayakul, T., & Wetpiriyakul, P. (2021). The Prevalence and Correlation between Degenerative Change of Cervical and Lumbar Spine. Vajira Medical Journal : Journal of Urban Medicine, 65(5), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.14456/vmj.2021.34
Section
Original Articles

References

Epstein NE, Epstein JA, Carras R, Murthy VS, Hyman RA. Coexisting cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery 1984;15(4):489-96.

Sheng-yun L, Letu S, Jian C, Mamuti M, Jun-hui L, Zhi S, et al. Comparison of modic changes in the lumbar and cervical spine, in 3167 patients with and without spinal pain. PLoS One 2014;9(12):e114993.

Morishita Y, Buser Z, D'Oro A, Shiba K, Wang JC. Clinical Relationship of Degenerative Changes between the Cervical and Lumbar Spine. Asian Spine J 2018;12(2):343-8.

Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 1988;168(1):177-86.

Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR. Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166:193-9.

Mann E, Peterson CK, Hodler J. Degenerative marrow (modic) changes on cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging scans: prevalence, inter- and intra-examiner reliability and link to disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(14): 1081-5.

Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Korsholm L, Sorensen JS, Bendix T. Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(10):1173-80.

Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, Bell GR, Bono CM, Fischgrund JS. Rothman-Simeone and Herkowitz's the spine. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA:Elsevier;2018.

Peterson CK, Humphreys BK, Pringle TC. Prevalence of modic degenerative marrow changes in the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30(1):5-10.