Recognition, Knowledge, and Attitudes Toward Labor Companionship: A Hospital-Based Prospective Study Labor companionship

Main Article Content

Sornpin Armarttasn
Siriwan Tangjitgamol
Vorachai Chuenchompoonut
Boonchai Uerpairojkit
Pranpanita Intachit
Sinaporn Maparang
Supaporn Parito
Natapon Ativanichayapong

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the recognition, knowledge, and attitudes toward labor companionship among pregnant women, their labor companions (LCs), and hospital personnel (HP).
METHODS: This cross-sectional survey included women who gave birth our hospital between October 2022 and April 2023. Their LCs and selected HP were also invited to participate. Data on personal demographics, recognition, knowledge (considered good if participants correctly answered ≥ 8 out of 10 questions), and attitudes (considered positive with scores ≥ 48 out of 60 on 12 questions) were collected through a self-answered questionnaire. Attitudes were assessed once for HP and twice (before and after delivery) for women and their LCs.
RESULTS: A total of 191 individuals participated, including 67 pregnant women, 106 LCs, and 18 HPs. The overall recognition rate was 20.4%, with rates of 50.0% among HP, 14.9% among women, and 18.9% among LCs. Good knowledge was found in 9.5% of pregnant women, 8.1% of spouses, and 33.3% of HP (p = 0.066). Positive attitudes were observed in 72.7% of HP. Among pregnant women, 84.4% had positive attitudes before delivery, and 81.3% maintained them afterward (p = 0.060). For LCs, positive attitudes were recorded in 69.8% before delivery and 81.4% after (p = 0.308).
CONCLUSION: The study found that recognition of labor companionship was low, and most participants lacked sufficient knowledge. However, nearly three-fourths exhibited positive attitudes. Notably, pregnant women’s attitudes did not improve after having an LC, whereas LCs demonstrated more positive attitudes following their experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Armarttasn, S., Tangjitgamol, S., Chuenchompoonut, V., Uerpairojkit, B., Intachit, P., Maparang, S., Parito, S., & Ativanichayapong, N. (2025). Recognition, Knowledge, and Attitudes Toward Labor Companionship: A Hospital-Based Prospective Study : Labor companionship. Vajira Medical Journal : Journal of Urban Medicine, 69(3), e274241. https://doi.org/10.62691/vmj.2025.274241
Section
Original Articles

References

Roberts L, Gulliver B, Fisher J, Cloyes KG. The coping with labor algorithm: an alternate pain assessment tool for the laboring woman. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;55(2):107-16.

Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(3):CD003766.

World Health Organization. Companion of choice during labour and childbirth for improved quality of care [internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-SRH-20.13

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215

Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7(7):CD003766.

Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, Tunçalp Ö. Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3(3):CD012449.

Kabakian-Khasholian T, El-Nemer A, Bashour H. Perceptions about labor companionship at public teaching hospitals in three Arab countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;129(3):223-6.

Rungreangkulkij S, Ratinthorn A, Lumbiganon P, Zahroh RI, Hanson C, Dumont A, et al. Factors influencing the implementation of labour companionship: formative qualitative research in Thailand. BMJ Open 2022;12(5):e054946.

Jaroensook C, Siriarunrat S, Tachasuksri T. Effects of labor support by a female relative on suffering from labor pain, coping with labor pain, and satisfaction with childbirth experiences among primiparous parturients. JFONUBUU 2018;26(2):67-75.

Prasan S, Siriarunrat S, Tachasuksri T. Effects of continuous labor support programme on fear of childbirth and childbirth outcomes among primiparous women. NJPH 2021;31(1):148-60.

Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977.

Sarwal T, Sarwal Y, Tyagi S, Sarwal R. Healthcare providers’ knowledge regarding the presence of a birth companion during childbirth at a tertiary care hospital in India. BMC Pregnancy Childb 2023;23(1):159.

Balde MD, Nasiri K, Mehrtash H, Soumah AM, Bohren MA, Diallo BA, et al. Labour companionship and women’s experiences of mistreatment during childbirth: results from a multi-country community-based survey. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5(Suppl 2):e003564.

Böhren MA, Hazfiarini A, Vazquez Corona M, Colomar M, De Mucio B, Tunçalp Ö, et al. From global recommendations to (in)action: a scoping review of the coverage of companion of choice for women during labor and birth. PLOS Glob Public Health 2023;3(2):e0001476.

Mousa O, Salameh BS, Alqahtani M, David M, Almefarfesh AA, Duhilan DA, et al. Women’s attitudes, prevalence, related factors, and perceived barriers of birth companionship in Saudi Arabia. Women’s Health 2024;20:1-10.

Böhren MA, Tunçalp Ö. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023;3(3):CD003766.

World Health Organization. Counselling for maternal and newborn health care: A handbook for building skills [internet]. 2013 [cited 2022 May 15]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304186/

Wahdan Y, Abu-Rmeileh NME. The association between labor companionship and obstetric violence during childbirth in health facilities in five facilities in the occupied Palestinian territory. BMC Pregnancy Childb 2023;23:566.

Afulani P, Kusi C, Kirumbi L, Walker D. Companionship during facility-based childbirth: results from a mixed-methods study with recently delivered women and providers in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childb 2018;18(1):150.

Lathwal P, Vyas H, Singh P, Deviga T. Knowledge, attitude, and factors affecting implementation of birth companionship during labor among obstetricians, nurses, and pregnant women at a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Public Health Prev Care 2022;3(1):16-21.

Iliyasu Z, Abubakar IS, Galadanci HS, Aliyu MH. Birth preparedness, complication readiness and fathers’ participation in maternity care in a northern Nigerian community. Afr J Reprod Health 2010;14(1):21-32.

Chaote P, Mwakatundu N, Dominico S, Mputa A, Mbanza A, Metta M, et al. Birth companionship in a government health system: a pilot study in Kigoma, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childb 2021;21(1):304.

Viirman F, Hess Engström A, Sjömark J, Hesselman S, Sundström Poromaa I, Ljungman L, et al. Negative childbirth experience in relation to mode of birth and events during labour: A mixed methods study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023;282:146-54.

Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, Hildingsson I. The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:55.

Chung VW, Chiu JW, Chan DL, To WW. Companionship during labor promotes vaginal delivery and enhances maternal satisfaction. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstet Midwifery 2017;17(1):12-7.

Thomson G, Feeley C, Moran VH, Downe S, Oladapo OT. Women’s experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review. Reprod Health 2019;16(1):71.

Wanyenze RW, Byamugisha JK, Tumwesigye NM, Muwanguzi PA , Nalwadda GK. A qualitative exploratory interview study on birth companion support actions for women during childbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childb 2022;22(1):63.

Coutinho E, Vilaca Cardoso Antunes JG, Duarte J, Parreira V, Chaves C, Batista Nelas PA. Benefits for the father from their involvement in the labor and birth sequence. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2016;217:435-42.

Doba YS, Bulto GA, Tefera EG, Wakgari N, Daksisa T, Muda T. Birth attendants’ attitudes and practices of companionship during facility-based childbirth and associated factors in the West Shoa Zone, central Ethiopia: A mixed-method design. SAGE Open Med 2023;11:20503121231168284.

Getachew S, Negash S, Yusuf L. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of health professionals towards labor companions in health institutions in Addis Ababa. Int J Women’s Health 2018;3(2):1-9.

Kabakian-Khasholian T, Portela A. Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childb 2017;17(1):265.

Quali-Dec. A policy brief on WHO’s QUALI-DEC implementation: labour companionship [internet]. [cited 2022 May 15]. Available from: https://qualidec.com