Radiation dose from Computed Tomography Scanning in Patients at Kantharalak Hospital.
Keywords:
Diagnostic reference level, CT examination, CTDIvol, DLPAbstract
Objective The use of computed tomography (CT) is continuously increasing, which raises concerns about patient radiation dose. For Kantharalak Hospital, there is currently no empirical data on the radiation doses being used. This study's main objective was to evaluate the radiation dose patients receive from CT examinations at Kantharalak Hospital and compare it with Thailand's National Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for 2025.This was a retrospective descriptive study. Data for the volume CT dose index CTDIvol and dose-length product (DLP) were collected from the PACS dose reports of 180 patients. Patients were over 18 years old, weighed between 47-75 kg, and were scanned between December 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025. The median CTDIvol and DLP for each scan type were analyzed and compared against the national DRLs.Results: The study found that CTDIvol values were mostly consistent with the reference levels. However, the median $DLP$ for several major protocols—namely Brain NC, C, Chest NC, C, Upper Abdomen Multiphases, and Whole Abdomen—was significantly higher than the national DRLs.Conclusion: The high $DLP$ values in many protocols are likely attributable to scan lengths (z-axis) exceeding clinical necessity. Therefore, there is an urgent need to review and implement dose optimization protocols, particularly by defining scan limits appropriate to clinical indications, to reduce patient radiation dose in accordance with national standards and the ALARA principle.
References
Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950 2007. Radiology. 2009;253(2):520-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082010.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography— an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149.
Vetter RJ. ICRP publication 103, the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Health Phys. 2008;95(4):445-6.
Redberg RF. Cancer risks and radiation exposure from computed tomographic scans: how can we be sure that the benefits outweigh the risks? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2049-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.453.
Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168(1):1-64. doi: 10.1667/RR0763.1.
กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. National Diagnostic Reference Levels in Thailand 2025.
Vano E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, et al. ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP. 2017;46(1):1-144.
Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL. U.S. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology. 2017;284(1):120-33. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161911.
Pema D, Kritsaneepaiboon S. Radiation dose from computed tomography scanning in patients at Songklanagarind Hospital: diagnostic reference levels. J Health Sci Med Res. 2020;38(2):135-43. doi: 10.31584/jhsmr.2020732.
วลัยรัตน์ เงาดีงาม. ปริมาณรังสีที่ผู้ป่วยได้รับจากการตรวจด้วยเอกซเรย์คอมพิวเตอร์ของโรงพยาบาลสิชล. วารสารโรงพยาบาลนครพิงค์. 2564;12(2):97-107.
Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):881-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3462.
Kalton G. Systematic sampling. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. p.1-6.
McCollough CH. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce. Health Phys. 2008;95(5):508-17.
Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study.
The as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle: a brief overview. Radioprotection. 2019.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP Publication 135. Ann ICRP. 2017;46(1):1-144.
กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. มาตรฐานคุณภาพเครื่องเอกซเรย์วินิจฉัย. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. นนทบุรี: บริษัท บียอนด์ พับสิสชิ่ง จำกัด; 2566. 45 หน้า.
Toth E, Geleji B, Olerud C, El-Katib S, Fatahi M, Szalai G, et al. Investigating centering, scan length, and arm position impact on radiation dose across 4 countries from 4 continents during pandemic: Mitigating key radioprotection issues. Phys Med. 2021; 84:191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.017.
UKHSA / GOV.UK — National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs)
Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposures (J-RIME). Japan DRLs 2020
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, et al. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics. 2006;26(2):503-12. doi: 10.1148/rg.262055138.
Siegel MJ, Kaza RK, Bolus DN, Boll DT, Rofsky NM, DeLong DM, et al. White paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on automated kV selection for computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35(6):655-62. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31823a0058