A randomized controlled comparison of difference heart rate after the reversal of non-depolarized muscle relaxant with atropine 0.6 mg, 0.9 mg and 1.2 mg plus neostigmine 2.5 mg
Keywords:
atropine, reversal, muscle relaxant, heart rateAbstract
Background: At the end of general anesthesia,
reverse effect of muscle relaxant by using anticholinesterase
agents is recommended. To minimize
muscarinic effect from neostigmine, atropine up to
1.2 mg is preferred in most cases. Anyway some
dangerous tachyarrhythmias may be occurred.
Objective: To compare difference in heart rate and
complication after the reversal of non-depolarized
muscle relaxant using atropine 0.6 mg, 0.9 mg and
1.2 mg combined with 2.5 mg of neostigmine.
Methods: After approved by Khonkaen Hospital
Institute Review Board in Human Research (KIRB)
and registered on clinical trials, the prospective
randomized double-blind controlled trial was
conducted during October to November 2015. Adult
patients, age 18-65 year old, ASA I-II who underwent
elective surgery and received general anesthesia with
endotracheal intubation with balanced technique
were included. For reversal of non-depolarizing
muscle relaxant, patients were randomly divided into
3 groups to receive either 0.6 mg, 0.9 mg or 1.2 mg
of atropine 30 seconds before neostigmine 2.5 mg.
Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before
atropine administration then every 1 minute for
15 minutes and every 5 minutes until complete
90 minutes of observation. Results: Eighty-seven
patients were included in this study, 29 for each group.
Compare mean heart rate between atropine 1.2 mg
group with atropine 0.6 mg group were significantly
difference (p<0.05). When compare mean heart rate
between atropine 1.2 mg group with atropine 0.9 mg
group were not significantly difference (p>0.05). We
found the maximum increment of heart rate of 34.6%,
22.4% and 21.8% from baseline in 1.2, 0.9 and 0.6 mg
of atropine group, respectively. Two cases in atropine
0.6 mg group got significant delayed bradycardia of
38 and 40 beat per minute which required additional
atropine 0.6 mg. Conclusion: We recommended that the 0.9 mg of atropine injected 30 seconds before neostigmine administration might have a good benefit
and can be used safely as an alternative choice in
high cardiovascular risk patients.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.