Validation of the Tests

Main Article Content

Araya Ongiem


Quality of the tests yields a good research outcome. The tests including a paper-pencil test, a performance appraisal, a checklist, a structured interview or a questionnaire,
etc. should be qualified and validated under the academic standard, as its results can efficiently be inferential to other studies.
Basically, validation of the tests is to approve its validity, reliability, mutual understanding or objectivity of statements/questions/decision criteria or assessment, as well as difficulty and discrimination. It can be achieved by statistical analysis in various features such as Cronbach’s reliability, Pearson’s correlation coefficient. This is to confirm that the research tools have high quality with consistency according to the study objectives.

Article Details

Review articles


American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999. p. 33-47.
2. Trochim WMK. Research Methods Knowledge Base. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jan 20]. Available from:
3. Ronna CT, Laurie C. Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. Int J Test 2003;3(2):163-71.
4. Ronald HB. Face validity, InL Irving WB, Edward CW. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. 2010: p. 637-8.
5. McIntire SA, Miller LA. Foundations of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. Sage; 2005. p. 209-35.
6. National Council on Measurement in Education. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jan 20]. Available from:
7. Eisinga R, Te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman-Brown?. Int J Public Health 2012;58(4):637-42.
8. Cronbach LJ. Validation of educational measures. Proceedings of the 1969 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service; 1969: p. 35-52.
9. Gronlund NE, Linn RL. Measurement and evaluation in teaching. 6th ed. New York: MacMillan; 1990.
10. Popham WJ. Modern educational measurement. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1981.
11. Thorndike RM, Cunningham GK, Thorndike RL, Hagen EP. Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. 5th ed. New York: MacMillan; 1991.
12. Wiersma W. Jurs SG. Educational measurement and testing. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1990. p. 55-152.
13. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol 1995;50:741-9.
14. Mahatnirunkul S, Pumpaisanchai W, Tarpunya P. The construction of Suan Prung stress test for Thai population. Bull Suan Prung 1997;13(3):1-11.