Comparison of Blood Pressure Measurement between Different Directions of Cuff tube in Tucked Arm Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial
Keywords:
Blood Pressure, Cuff tube, Tucked arm surgeryAbstract
Background: During blood pressure (BP) measurement, the standard positioning of cuff tube is on the downside direction. However, the use of upside cuff tube direction may be more suitable in some situations to minimize an event of bend or to reduce a chance of compression by surgical team. Therefore, we investigated the difference of BP measurement between two methods. Methods: Thirty adult patients scheduled for thyroid surgery were enrolled and got BP measurements of both arms. They were randomized to receive upside cuff tube placement in one arm and downside on the other. BP was measured during preoperative period and intra-operative period every 15 minutes till the end of operation or 2 hours. Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly different in preoperative on the right arm side, the mean SBP in the upside cuff tube direction was 129.33 ± 23.78 mmHg and in the downside cuff tube direction was 132.80 ± 21.29 mmHg (p= 0.017). Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean blood pressure (MAP) were found not significantly different between upside and downside cuff tube direction. The number to repeat measurement of blood pressure during intra-operative period was not significantly different (p= 0.940) between upside and downside cuff tube direction (upside median was 1 and 4, respectively). Conclusions: There was only significant different in systolic blood pressure in different cuff tube direction during preoperative at the right arm. However, this difference was not clinically important.
References
Misra S, Myers MG, Ogedegbe G, Schwartz JE, Townsend
RR, Urbina EM. Measurement of blood pressure in humans:
a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
Hypertension 2019; 73:e35-66.
2. Myers MG, McInnis NH, Fodor GJ, Leenen FH. Comparison
between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in
a population survey. Am J Hypertens 2008;21:280-3.
3. Loenneke JP, Loprinzi PD, Abe T, et al. Arm circumference
influences blood pressure even when applying the correct
cuff size: Is a further correction needed? Int J Cardiol
2016;202:743-4.
4. Orme S, Ralph SG, Birchall A, Lawson-Matthew P, McLean
K, Channer KS. The normal range for inter-arm differences
in blood pressure. Age Ageing 1999;28:537-42.
5. Clark CE, Taylor RS, Shore AC, Ukoumunne OC, Campbell
JL. Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure
between arms with vascular disease and mortality:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet 2012;
379:905-14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.