Successful Discharge Rate of One-Day Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery by Modified Post-Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System in Siriraj Hospital
Keywords:
ambulatory, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system, one day surgeryAbstract
Background: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) could be done safely. One day surgery (ODS) is a new program supported by Thai government. It is to discharge the patient within the same day of surgery or within 24 hours from incision time. A modified post-anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) is recommended. Objective: To determine the successfully discharge rate (PADSS = 9,10) within 24 hours from incision time in normal practice LC without specific ODS protocol and to compare the anesthetic and surgical factors between the patients with PADSS = 9,10 and the patients with PADSS score < 9. Methods: The prospective cohort, non-allocation study in elective LC from 18 years in Siriraj hospital in February-March 2020. Demographic, preoperative intraoperative and postoperative data were reviewed from the hospital chart. PADSS evaluation were done at 24 hours after incision. The number of patients with PADSS = 9,10 reported by percentage and 95% CI. Comparing factors between two groups using a t-test. Results: Patients with PADSS = 9,10 were found 44 from 55 cases (80.0%) (95%CI 67-89.6%): 100.0%, 87.0% and 65.2% of ASA I, II and III, respectively. Patient’s age (59.6±13.8 years vs 71.7±16.0 years, P=0.016), operative time (84.4±34.6 min vs 112.3±35.2 min, P=0.021) and anesthetic duration (152.3±36.6 min vs 121.5±36.8 min, P=0.016) in the PADSS score 9,10 group were significantly lower than in the PADSS score < 9 group. Conclusions: In normal practice of elective LC in Siriraj Hospital, we could discharge patients within 24 hours after incision by using modified PADSS (score = 9,10) in 80.0% of cases. The major problem of delayed discharge time was ambulation. Important factors are ASA physical status, age, operative time, and anesthetic time.
References
ทวี รัตนชูเอก. ข้อเสนอแนะด้านการพัฒนาระบบบริการการผ่าตัดแบบวันเดียวกลับ. กรมการแพทย์ 2560:8-10. AHRQ safety program for ambulatory surgery. Available from https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-
patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/ambulatory-surgery-report.pdf. [Accessed May 2017].
Chung F, Chan VWS, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1995:7:500-6.
White PF, Eng M. Fast-track anesthetic techniques for ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20:545-57.
Lee JH. Anesthesia for ambulatory surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70:398-406.
Hansen J, Rasmussen LS, Steinmetz J. Management of ambulatory anesthesia in older adults. Drugs Aging. 2020;37:863-74.
Rosen MJ, Malm JA, Tarnoff M, Zuccala K, Ponsky JL. Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11:182-4.
Serra AS, Roig MP, Lledo JB, et al. The learning curve in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:320-4.
Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:40-5.
Tenconi SM, Boni L, Colombo EM, Dionigi G, Rovera F, Cassinotti E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as day-surgery procedure: current indications and patients’ selection. Int J Surg. 2008;6(Suppl1):S86-8.
Pérez MAL, Villarreal GC, Cumplido PL, Obregón RA. Comparative study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy verus management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional hospital stay. Cir Esp. 2013;91:424-31.
Tang H, Dong A, Yan L. Day surgery versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:556-61.
Lledó JB, Castro PG, Gavara IGI, Cirión JLI, Andújar RL, Granero EG. Twenty-five years of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cir Esp. 2016;94:429-41.
Teixeira UF, Goldoni MB, Machry MC, Ceccon PN, Fontes PRO, Waechter FL. Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and cost-effective: a Brazilian single center experience. Arq Gastroenterol. 2016;53:103-7.
Cao J, Liu B, Shi J, et al. Safety of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91:597-602.
Cao J, Liu B, Li X, et al. Analysis of delayed discharge after day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg. 2017;40:33-7.
Seyednejad N, Goecke M, Konkin DE. Timing of unplanned admission following daycare laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2017;214:89-92.
Rosero EB, Joshi GP. Hospital readmission after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy:
incidence and predictors. J Surg Res. 2017;219:108-15.
Barazanchi AWH, MacFater WS, Rahiri JL, Tutone S, Hill AG, Joshi GP. Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:787-803.
Odom-Forren J, Reed DB, Rush C. Postoperative symptom distress of laparoscopic cholecystectomy ambulatory surgery patients. J Perianesth Nurs. 2018;33:801-13.
López JLT, Cadahía DP, Noalles MJA, Cortés TS, Navarro PA. Perioperative factors that contribute to postoperative pain and/or nausea and vomiting in ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2019;66:189-98.
Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, et al. Fourth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020;131:411-48.
แนวทางเวชปฏิบัติสาหรับการป้องกันและรักษาภาวะคลื่นไส้อาเจียนหลังการผ่าตัด Prevention and treatment guideline for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Available from https://www.rcat.org/_files/ugd/82246c_3ca7253020344933ae10a7aaa20ecdc9.pdf. [Accessed 2 August 2022].
Asada J, Ida M, Sato M, Okamoto N, Kawaguchi M. Associated factors with delayed ambulation after abdominal surgery. J Anesth. 2019;33:680-4.
Dermody G, Kovach CR. Barriers to promoting mobility in hospitalized older adults. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018;11:17-27.
Zisberg A, Syn-Hershko A. Factors related to the mobility of hospitalized older adults: a prospective cohort study. Geriatr Nurs. 2016;37:96-100.
Brown CJ, Williams BR, Woodby LL, Davis LL, Allman RM. Barriers to mobility during hospitalization from the perspectives of older patients and their nurses and physicians. J Hosp Med. 2007;2:305-13.
Ahn Y, Woods J, Connor S. A systematic review of interventions to facilitate ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:677-86.
Gregori M, Miccini M, Biacchi D, de Schoutheete JC, Bonomo L, Manzelli A. Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safety and feasibility in obese patients. Int J Surg. 2018;49:22-6.
Sala-Hernández A, Castro PG, Orón EM, et al. Evaluation of patient safety and satisfaction in a program of ambulatory laparoscopic chole-cystectomy program with expanded criteria. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2019;97:27-33.
Marinis A, Stamatakis E, Tsaroucha A. et al. Safety and effectiveness of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital: a prospective study of 110 consecutive patients. BMC Res Notes. 2010;22;3:207.
Magdaleno HS, Tarragó AC, Casas CO, et al. Evaluation of the impact of preoperative education in ambulatory laparoscopic chole-cystectomy. a prospective, double-blind randomized trial. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018;96:88-95.
Balciscueta I, Barberà F, Lorenzo J, Martínez S, Sebastián M, Balciscueta Z. Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of failure. Surgery. 2021;170:373-82.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.
