Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine in Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Colonoscopy: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
Keywords:
colonoscopy, lidocaine, propofol, total intravenous anesthesiaAbstract
Background: Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is widely used as an anesthetic technique in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Lidocaine can reduce visceral pain and potentiates the ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lidocaine combined with propofol during a colonoscopic procedure. Methods: Sixty-one patients underwent elective colonoscopy under TIVA with IV fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg and propofol 1 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg/h as a maintenance infusion with titration as needed. The patients were also randomized to receive 1.5 mg/kg of IV lidocaine followed by 2 mg/kg/h (group L) or 0.3 mL/kg of IV normal saline followed by 0.4 mL/kg/h (group N). The primary outcome was the total dose of propofol used. The secondary outcomes were complications and adverse events. Results: Data for 60 patients were available for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the median total dose of propofol used between the two groups or in episodes of apnea and desaturation. The mean difference in mean arterial pressure at 5 min after scope insertion was significantly smaller in group N than in group L. There was no statistically significant between groups in terms of the decrease in heart rate from baseline, or any adverse events. Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg followed by lidocaine 2 mg/kg/h did not decrease the dose of IV propofol used during a colonoscopic procedure. However, it was able to reduce the risk of hypotension in the early induction phase.
References
Early DS, Lightdale JR, Vargo JJ, et al. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:327-37.
Sonnenberg A. Sedation in colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;12:327-9.
Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Hosoe N, Ogata H, Kanai T, Yahagi N. Dexmedetomidine vs propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:1037-45.
Seleem WM, El Hossieny KM, Abd-Elsalam S. Evaluation of different sedatives for colonoscopy. Curr Drug Saf. 2020;15:20-4.
Daykin H. The efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for analgesia in the older adult: a
literature review. Br J Pain. 2017;11:23-31.
Labaille T, Clergue F, Samii K, Ecoffey C, Berdeaux A. Ventilatory responses to CO2 following intravenous and epidural lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1985;63:179-83.
Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, et al. Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016;17:131-57.
Forster C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Gast P, et al. Intravenous infusion of lidocaine significantly reduces propofol dose for colonoscopy: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:1059-64.
Pasero C. Assessment of sedation during opioid administration for pain management. J Perianesth Nurs. 2009;24:186-90.
Chen M, Lu Y, Liu H, et al. The propofol-sparing effect of intravenous lidocaine in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:132.
Li X, Lv X, Jiang Z, et al. Application of intravenous lidocaine in obese patients undergoing painless colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:3509-18.
Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W, et al. Efficacy and safety of supplemental intravenous lidocaine for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93:1241-9.
Li M, Ke W, Zhuang S. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on propofol consumption in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22:61.
Filipescu D, Ştefan M. Sex and gender differences in anesthesia: relevant also for perioperative safety? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021;35:141-53.
Diego LADS. Anesthesia and women’s peculiarities. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2023;69(Suppl1):e2023S103.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.