Femoral Nerve Block Versus Intraarticular Infiltration: A Comparison of Analgesic Effects and Quadriceps Strength in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Abstract
Background: Early rehabilitation is a quite concern for patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Objective: To compare analgesia and quadriceps strength after femoral nerve block (FNB) with intraarticular (IA) infiltrationusing bupivacaine 0.25% for ACL reconstruction with patella tendon graft.
Material and Method: Forty patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups. Group FNB received spinal anesthesia plus a FNB under ultrasound guidance with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%. FNB was performed at the end of surgery. Group IA received spinal anesthesia plus an intraarticularinfiltration with 5 mL of bupivacaine infiltrated along the patella tendon incision site and 15 mL into the knee joint. Both groups received intravenous ketorolac at wound closure. Data regarding demographic, time to first pain, time to first morphine requirement, morphine usage, pain scores, quadriceps strengthand complications were recorded.
Results: Both groups had similar median time to first pain (7 hours for group FNB versus 6 hours for group IA, p = 0.20) and first morphine requirement (10 hours, p = 0.68). Ninety percent of the patients in group IA and 55% of the patients in group FNB had good ability to extend knee at 24 hours after surgery (p = 0.01). No significant differences between groups for demographic data, postoperative pain scores andmorphine consumption. There were no complications associated with FNB or IA infiltration.
Conclusions: Concerning quadriceps weakness, intraarticular bupivacaine infiltration has an effect on quadriceps strength less than FNB while provide comparable postoperative analgesia after patellar tendon graft ACL reconstruction.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.