Endotracheal Intubation Training in Soft Cadaveric Models Versus Manikins of Medical Students; A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is considered as a potentially life - saving procedure, and thus it is a basic essential skill that medical students must acquire. Soft cadaver is another promising tool for intubation skill acquisition since it is flexible and more realistic. However, it has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of ETI between medical students trained in soft cadavers versus manikins.
Material and method: In this prospective, group randomized controlled trial, fifth - year medical students (n = 140) with no prior ETI training, initially received theoretical and a video demons-tration about ETI. After randomization, students were trained with manikin (Laerdal® Airway Management trainer) or soft cadavers. Subsequently, all students were evaluated on the ground of performing ETI in 3 adult anesthetized patients. The primary outcome was the intubation success rate in their third patient.
Results: The intubation success rate in third patient was 75.7% in manikin group and 74.3% in cadaveric group with statistically insignificant (p = 0.808). Overall intubation success rate in manikin group was 73.3% and cadaveric group was 64.8% (p = 0.057). The successful intubation time did not differ between the 2 groups (p = 0.504) with the mean of 82.6 seconds in both groups. There were no differences in the complication rate of dental injury, soft tissue injury, hypoxia and esophageal intubation. Performance of intubation was statistically insignificant.
Conclusion: Soft cadaver can be used as a model for ETI training, with no differences in learning outcome comparing to Laerdal manikin.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.