Comparison of propofol and propofol/ thiopentone admixture for ProsealTM insertion
Keywords:
Propofol, thiopentone, Proseal, laryngeal mask airwayAbstract
Background: The ProsealTM is commonly used for airway management during general anesthesia in Ratchaburi Hospital. Intravenous propofol (1%) has been used as an induction of choice for LMA insertion. However, the recommended dose of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 given intravenously could be associated with cardiovascular and respiratory depression.
Objectives: to assess insertion condition and hemodynamic responses by comparing propofol (1%) and an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1) during induction of anesthesia.
Methods: In a prospective, randomized controlled study, 190 nonpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were allocated into two groups: Group P received propofol 1%. Group PT received an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1), both at a dose of 0.25 ml.kg-1. The insertion condition, ease of insertion, apnea time and hemodynamic responses between the two groups were assessed.
Results: The incidences of resistance to mouth opening, resistance to insertion and coughing were significantly higher in the PT group than the P group (P = 0.017). There was no difference in terms of swallowing, movement and apnea time between the two groups. None of patients developed laryngospasm. Decrease in MAP and HR during administration of Propofol - thiopentone admixture was significantly less than administration of Propofol alone.
Conclusions: In nonparalyzed patients, propofol provides better conditions and easier ProsealTM insertion, but has greater hemodynamic instability than an admixture of propofol 0.5% and thiopentone 1.25% (1:1).
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.