The effectiveness evaluation of stroke special nursing training program: the application of Kirkpatrick’s model approach
Keywords:
effectiveness evaluation, special nursing training program, stroke nursing, Kirkpatrick’s ModelAbstract
This research aimed to examine the effectiveness of Stroke Special Nursing Training Program using Kirkpatrick’s Model approach 4 levels: reaction, learning, behavioral change and results of organization. The mixed method design was used and divided into 2 phases. Phase1: quantitative study of reaction and learning evaluation of 32 nursing students of special nursing training course of Stroke nursing. Data were collected using satisfaction questionnaire and pre-posttest of Stroke knowledge. Phase 2: quantitative and qualitative studies for evaluation of the trainees’ behavioral change and results of organization. The participants were 32 trainees of special nursing training, 32 nursing administrators, 22 nurse instructors and mentors. Data were collected using trainees’ behavior change, and semi-structured interview of results evaluation. Data analyzed using descriptive statistic, paired t-test and content analysis.
The results indicated that the phase I: the stroke special nursing trainees evaluated training program reaction through overall satisfaction as a very good category. Their learning ability was improved significantly after participating in the program (p<0.001) and they could pass both theory and practice examinations at 100%. In phase II: The researchers followed behavioral change evaluated by their administrators after six months. The trainees’ behavioral changed showed improved significantly after finishing the program (p < 0.001). The participants evaluated positive results to their organization. The trainees could apply knowledge, attitude and skill to improve themselves and sharing knowledge with colleagues. They could also develop the networks of Stroke care, and improve better quality of care for patients with Stroke.
The study provided the evidence based knowledge and valuable recommendation to create standard and quality of special nursing course of Stroke nursing training that relate to needs of trainees and organizations in the future.
References
2. Office of International Policy Development (Thailand). Report of burden of disease and injury of Thai population in 2013. Nonthaburi: The Graphico System; 2017. (in Thai).
3. Bureau of Non Communicable Disease. Annual report of Bureau of Non Communicable Disease, Ministry of Public Health 2013. Bangkok: The War Veterans Organization of Thailand Publishing; 2013. (in Thai).
4. Bureau of Non Communicable Disease. Assessment of risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with D.M. and hypertension. Bangkok: The War Veterans Organization of Thailand Publishing; 2013. (in Thai).
5. Ellis L, Nolan M. Illuminating continuing professional education: unpacking the black box. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005; 42(1):97-106.
6. Su WM, Osisek PJ. The revised Bloom’s taxonomy: Implications for educating nurses. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2011; 42(7):321-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20110621-05
7. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. 3rd. ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.
8. Lee-Kelly L, Blackman D. Project training evaluation: reshaping boundary objects and assumptions. Int. J. Project Manage. 2012; 30(1):73-82.
9. Wongba C, Jongjaihan K. The evaluation of training the CHAMPION program applied by Kirkpatrick approach. Journal of the office of DPC 7 Khon Kaen. 2012;19(1):27-37. (in Thai).
10. Louhasuwanpanich S, Namthep J, Simpattananont K. Analysis & evaluation of preceptor training program in nursing department, Siriraj Hospital. Siriraj Nursing Journal. 2007;1(1):37-49. (in Thai).
11. Mitoma R, Yamauchi T. Effectiveness of a learning support program for respiratory physical assessment: a quasi-experimental study. PloS one. 2018; 13(9):e0202998. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202998
12. Kirkpaick DL. Evaluating in-house training program. Train Dev J. 1978; 32(9):6-9.
13. Farjad, S. The Evaluation Effectiveness of training courses in University by Kirkpatrick Model (case study: Islamshahr university). Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;46: 2837–41.
14. Thuraphun S, Panhoon S, Jiraro P, Wongwanich S. Development of the Indicators and instrument to evaluate the effectiveness of the professional nurse training project: an application of kirkpatrick’s model and theory-based evaluation approaches. EpSBS. 2016; Vol.16-ICEEPSY: 1639-645. 10.15405/epsbs.2016.11.67.
15. Carlfjord S, Roback K, Nilsen P. Five years' experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants. Implement Sci. 2017; 12(1): 101. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4.
16. Maddineshat M, Hashemi M, Besharati R, Gholami S, Ghavidel F. The effectiveness of clinical teaching of mental health courses in nursing using clinical supervision and Kirkpatrick's model. Electron Physician. 2018; 10(1): 6265-6272. doi:10.19082/6265.
17. Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council. Criteria of development of special nursing training program and management of the program 2014. Nonthaburi: Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2017. (in Thai).
18. Muangjaroen Y, Meechan S. Evaluation of the residency training program of the department of pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi hospital. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University. 2015; 8(1): 1059-74. (in Thai).
19. Dorri S, Akbari M, Dorri S, Sedeh M. Kirkpatrick evaluation model for in-service training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016; 21(5): 493-97.
20. Kearsley, G. Andragogy (M. Knowles). The theory into practice database. [Internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 12]. Available from http://tip.psychology.org
21.Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council. Competency- based of bachelor degree, master degree, Ph.D. of nursing science, certificate of advanced practice nurses program and special nursing training program. Nonthaburi: Thailand Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2017. (in Thai).
22. Office of the Permanent Secretary. Service plan 2018 – 2023. Bangkok: Printing Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand; 2016. (in Thai).
23. Boonthong T, Hanucharurnkul S. Strategies for development and retention of nurse within nursing profession. Thai Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Practice. 2016;3(2): 15-24. (in Thai).
24. Case Management Society of America. (CMSA). The standards of practice for case management. [Internet]. [cited 2016 Aug 15]. Available from http://www.cmsa.org/portals/0/pdf/memberonly/ StandardsOfPractice.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
บทความนี้ยังไม่เคยตีพิมพ์หรืออยู่ในระหว่างส่งไปตีพิมพ์ในวารสารอื่น ๆ มาก่อน และกองบรรณาธิการขอสงวนสิทธิ์ในการตรวจทาน และแก้ไขต้นฉบับตามเกณฑ์ของวารสาร ในกรณีที่เรื่องของท่านได้ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารฉบับนี้ถือว่าเป็น ลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารพยาบาลโรคหัวใจและทรวงอก
