The mental foramen in panoramic versus cone beam computed tomogram

Main Article Content

Natthamet Wongsirichat
Watus Sakdajeyont
Teeranut Chaiyasamut
Raweewan Arayasontiparb

Abstract

Backgrounds: The mental nerve is one of the important inferior alveolar nerve block, were to find the existence the mental foramen, anterior loop of mental foramen and dimensional distortion of radiography. The purpose was to determine the size distortion versus the presence of mental foramen with anterior loop of mental nerve by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).


Materials and methods: Eighty volunteers of the radiographs of the mental and accessory mental foramina as well as their anterior loop were examined. The diameters of mental foramen, distance of upper border of mental foramen to the second premolar root, distance of lower border of mental foramen to inferior border of mandible and distance of anterior border of mental foramen to anterior border of anterior loop, were measured.  Paired t test (P<0.05) for comparing between the distances obtained from both imaging modalities.


Results: The mental foramen, the accessory mental foramina and the anterior loop of mental foramen were exhibited in 90%, 1.38%, 65.27% in panoramic radiograph, and was shown 100%, 3.75%, 88.75% respectively, in CBCT. All measurements obtained from panoramic technique were significantly lesser than from CBCT except, distance from upper border of mental foramen to the second premolar root in panoramic radiograph was significantly greater than CBCT. 


Conclusion: It was worthy for local anesthetic injection to note that three observed anatomical structures were more difficult to identify in panoramic radiograph than CBCT. Additionally, the panoramic technique expressed more dimensional distortion in linear measurement than CBCT.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Wongsirichat N, Sakdajeyont W, Chaiyasamut T, Arayasontiparb R. The mental foramen in panoramic versus cone beam computed tomogram. M Dent J [Internet]. 2018 Jul. 20 [cited 2024 Jun. 25];38(2):159-67. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mdentjournal/article/view/179322
Section
Original articles

References

1. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89(5): 630-637.
2. Sakakura CE, Morais JA, Loffredo LC, Scaf G. A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32(6): 397-400.
3. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1991; 20(1): 40-42.
4. Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19(1): 81-85.
5. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G. Anatomy of Mandibular Vital Structures. Part II: Mandibular Incisive Canal, Mental Foramen and Associated Neurovascular Bundles in Relation with Dental Implantology. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2010; 1(1): e3
6. Ngeow WC, Dionysius DD, Ishak H, Nambiar P. Radiographic study on the visualization of the anterior loop in dentate subjects of different age groups. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51(2): 231-237.
7. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe I. Anterior loop of the mental canal: an anatomical-radiologic study. Implant Dent. 2000; 9(2): 120-5.
8. Arzouman MJ, Otis L, Kipnis V, Levine D. Observations of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8(3): 295-300.
9. Bavitz JB, Harn SD, Hansen CA, Lang M. An anatomical study of mental neurovascular
bundle implant relationships. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8(5): 563-7
10. Kuzmanovic DV, Payne AG, Kieser JA, Dias GJ. Anterior loop of the mental nerve: a morphological and radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14(4): 464-71.
11. Rosenquist B. Is there an anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996; 16: 40-45.
12. Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL. Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skulls. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1061-1067.
13. Catić A, Celebić A, Valentić-Peruzović M, Catović A, Jerolimov V, et al. Evaluation of the precision of dimentional measurements of the mandible on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 86: 242-248.
14. Akdeniz BG, Oksan T, Kovanlikaya I, Genç I. Evaluation of bone height and bone density by computed tomography and panoramic radiography for implant recipient sites. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26: 114-119.
15. Schnelle MA, Beck FM, Jaynes RM, Huja SS. A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. Angle Orthodontist 2004; 74: 832-837.
16. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72(1): 75-80.
17. Mohammed A. Alshehri, Hadi M. Alamri, Mazen A. Alshalhoob. CBCT applications in dental practice: A literature review. CAD/CAM 2010; 2: 27-31.
18. Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr., Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34(6): 369-375.
19. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1991; 20(1): 40-42.