Effect of different wavelength of LEDs on osteoblast-like cell cultured in 3D collagen type I scaffold

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jul 19, 2019
Keywords:
Andrographis paniculata gel, chronic periodontitis, doxycycline gel, supportive periodontal therapy, subtraction technique

Main Article Content

Tatsanee Tanglitanont
Private Clinic
Rochaya Chintavalakorn
Mahidol University
Peerapong Santiwong
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University
Anak Khantachawana
epartment of Mechanical Engineering and Biological Engineering Program, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi
Kwanchanok Viravaidya Pasuwat
Department of Chemical Engineering and Biological Engineering Program, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi

Abstract

Objective: To investigates the effect of 4 different wavelengths of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) irradiation on biological response of osteoblast cells (MC3T3-E1) cultured in 3 dimension (3D) collagen type I scaffold.


Materials and methods: The MC3T3-E1 were cultured on 3D type I collagen scaffolds and irradiated daily by LEDs light with wavelengths of 630, 680, 760 and 830 nm for 42 days at   radiant exposure of 3.1 J/cm2 (intensity 2 mW/cm2). The 3D cultured were subjected to biological tests concerning cell proliferation by DNA assay, cell differentiation by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and mineralization by calcium phosphate deposits at day 0th, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, 35th and 42th. The 3D cultured at day 42th was investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) to determine the effect of LEDs on cell formation.  The mineralization after 42 days in the 3D cultured was evaluated from elemental analysis to determine the ratio of calcium and phosphorus of mineralized granule.


Results: Statistical analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of cell proliferation (p<0.05) in all irradiated cultures in comparison with the controls. The 630 and 680 nm groups yielded a higher number of cells than the 760 and 830 nm (p<0.05).  Cell differentiation, obtained from ALP activity, was increased significantly after 680, 760 and 830 nm irradiation (p<0.05) but decreased after 630 nm irradiation. However, only 680 nm group had significantly greater mineralization than controls (P<0.001) at the end of the experimental period.


Conclusion: The results demonstrate that osteoblastic-liked cells respond to LEDs irradiation differently depending on wavelengths, from 630 to 830 nm, in proliferation and differentiation. To enhance bone mineralization, 680 nm peak irradiated is more effective than those of 630, 760 and 830 nm.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Tanglitanont T, Chintavalakorn R, Santiwong P, Khantachawana A, Pasuwat KV. Effect of different wavelength of LEDs on osteoblast-like cell cultured in 3D collagen type I scaffold. M Dent J [Internet]. 2019 Jul. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 18];39(2):143-52. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mdentjournal/article/view/199067
Issue
Vol. 39 No. 2 (2019): May-August
Section
Original articles

References

Silva Junior, A.N., et al., Computerized morphometric assessment of the effect of low-level laser therapy on bone repair: an experimental animal study. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 2002; 20(2): p. 83-7.

Nissan, J., et al., Effect of low intensity laser irradiation on surgically created bony defects in rats. J Oral Rehabil, 2006; 33(8): p. 619-924.

Almeida-Lopes, L., et al., Comparison of the low level laser therapy effects on cultured human gingival fibroblasts proliferation using different irradiance and same fluence. Lasers Surg Med, 2001; 29(2): p. 179-84.

Gaida, K., et al., Low Level Laser Therapy--a conservative approach to the burn scar? Burns, 2004; 30(4): p. 362-7.

Angeletti, P., et al., Effect of low-level laser therapy (GaAlAs) on bone regeneration in midpalatal anterior suture after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010; 109(3): p. e38-46.

Cepera, F., et al., Effect of a low-level laser on bone regeneration after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012; 141(4): p. 444-50.

Mozzati, M., et al., Influence of superpulsed laser therapy on healing processes following tooth extraction. Photomed Laser Surg, 2011; 29(8): p. 565-71.

Petri, A.D., et al., Effects of low-level laser therapy on human osteoblastic cells grown on titanium. Braz Dent J, 2010; 21(6): p. 491-8.

Cruz, D.R., et al., Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med, 2004; 35(2): p. 117-20.

Kawasaki, K. and N. Shimizu, Effects of low-energy laser irradiation on bone remodeling during experimental tooth movement in rats. Lasers Surg Med, 2000; 26(3): p. 282-91.

Kau, C.H., et al., Photobiomodulation accelerates orthodontic alignment in the early phase of treatment. Prog Orthod, 2013; 14: p. 30.

Saracino, S., et al., Superpulsed laser irradiation increases osteoblast activity via modulation of bone morphogenetic factors. Lasers Surg Med, 2009; 41(4): p. 298-304.

Marquezan, M., A.M. Bolognese, and M.T. Araujo, Effects of two low-intensity laser therapy protocols on experimental tooth movement. Photomed Laser Surg, 2010; 28(6): p. 757-62.

Takeda, Y., Irradiation effect of low-energy laser on alveolar bone after tooth extraction. Experimental study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1988; 17(6): p. 388-91.

Limpanichkul, W., et al., Effects of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2006; 9(1): p. 38-43.

Youssef, M., et al., The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci, 2008; 23(1): p. 27-33.

Habib, F.A., et al., Laser-induced alveolar bone changes during orthodontic movement: a histological study on rodents. Photomed Laser Surg, 2010; 28(6): p. 823-30.

Seifi, M., et al., Effects of two types of low-level laser wave lengths (850 and 630 nm) on the orthodontic tooth movements in rabbits. Lasers Med Sci, 2007; 22(4): p. 261-4.

Gao, X. and D. Xing, Molecular mechanisms of cell proliferation induced by low power laser irradiation. J Biomed Sci, 2009; 16: p. 4.

Karu, T.I. and S.F. Kolyakov, Exact action spectra for cellular responses relevant to phototherapy. Photomed Laser Surg, 2005; 23(4): p. 355-61.

Sommer, A.P., et al., Biostimulatory windows in low-intensity laser activation: lasers, scanners, and NASA's light-emitting diode array system. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 2001; 19(1): p. 29-33.

Pinheiro, A.L. and M.E. Gerbi, Photoengineering of bone repair processes. Photomed Laser Surg, 2006; 24(2): p. 169-78.

Whelan, H.T., et al., Effect of NASA light-emitting diode irradiation on wound healing. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 2001; 19(6): p. 305-14.

Posten, W., et al., Low-level laser therapy for wound healing: mechanism and efficacy. Dermatol Surg, 2005; 31(3): p. 334-40.

Vinck, E.M., et al., Increased fibroblast proliferation induced by light emitting diode and low power laser irradiation. Lasers in Medical Science, 2003; 18(2): p. 95-99.

Pampaloni, F., E.G. Reynaud, and E.H. Stelzer, The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2007; 8(10): p. 839-45.

Abramovitch-Gottlib, L., et al., Low level laser irradiation stimulates osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells seeded on a three-dimensional biomatrix. Lasers Med Sci, 2005; 20(3-4): p. 138-46.

Renno, A.C., et al., Effect of 830 nm laser phototherapy on osteoblasts grown in vitro on Biosilicate scaffolds. Photomed Laser Surg, 2010; 28(1): p. 131-3.

Huang, Y.Y., et al., Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy. Dose Response, 2009; 7(4): p. 358-83.

Karu, T., Molecular mechanism of the therapeutic effect of low-intensity laser radiation. J Lasers Life Sci, 1988; 2(1): p. 53-74.

Wilden, L. and R. Karthein, Import of radiation phenomena of electrons and therapeutic low-level laser in regard to the mitochondrial energy transfer. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 1998; 16(3): p. 159-65.

AlGhamdi, K.M., A. Kumar, and N.A.J.L.i.m.s. Moussa, Low-level laser therapy: a useful technique for enhancing the proliferation of various cultured cells. Lasers in Medical Science, 2012; 27(1): p. 237-249.

Stein, A., et al., Low-level laser irradiation promotes proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblasts in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg, 2005; 23(2): p. 161-6.

Khadra, M., et al., Effect of laser therapy on attachment, proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells cultured on titanium implant material. Biomaterials, 2005; 26(17): p. 3503-9.

Calderhead, R.G.J.L.T., The photobiological basics behind light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy. Laser Therapy, 2007; 16(2): p. 97-108.