The effect of blasting zirconia liner on microtensile bond strength of zirconia to layered and pressed veneers

Main Article Content

Noppavan Nagaviroj
Alisa Tapananon
Widchaya Kanchanavasita
Somsak Chitmongkolsuk


Objective: To investigate the effect of sandblasting the zirconia liner on the microtensile bond strength of manually-layered and pressed veneers to zirconia

Materials and methods: Bilayered zirconia specimens were prepared from e.max®ZirCAD framework materials and divided into four groups (at least 30 specimens per group). Two veneering techniques were used: I. Layering technique (e.max®Ceram) for group 1 and group 2 and II. Press-on technique (e.max®ZirPress) for group 3 and group 4.  ZirLiner was applied onto the zirconia surfaces in group 1 and 3 and fired according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Veneering of these specimens was then performed. The surfaces of group 2 and 4 were treated similarly to group 1 and 3, except that sandblasting with 50-μm aluminum oxide particles was performed on the fired liner material. The bilayered blocks were cut into microbars with 1mm x 1mm in cross-section. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a microtensile tester. The fracture surfaces were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope to identify the mode of failure.

Results: When the liner material was blasted, the mean microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of bilayered specimens in the layering group (14.5±2.7 MPa) and the press-on group (15.5±5.0 MPa) were significantly lower than those of unblasted liner groups (16.5±3.5 MPa for layering and 19.8±6.1 MPa for press-on). Most of the fractures occurring in all groups initiated at the zirconia-veneer interface.

Conclusions: Blasting the zirconia liner material decreased the bond strength between zirconia to layered and pressed veneers. Interfacial failure was predominantly observed in all groups.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nagaviroj N, Tapananon A, Kanchanavasita W, Chitmongkolsuk S. The effect of blasting zirconia liner on microtensile bond strength of zirconia to layered and pressed veneers. M Dent J [Internet]. 2020 Oct. 21 [cited 2023 Nov. 30];37(2):163-72. Available from:
Original articles


1. Denry I KJ. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299-307.
2. Nikzad S AA, Dehgan S. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) versus laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers: a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:569-74.
3. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-63.
4. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;2:984-91.
5. Sailer I FA, Filser F, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ, Schärer P, Hämmerle CHF. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37:41-9.
6. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:383-8.
7. Scurria MS BJ, Shugars DA. . Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: Protheses and abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:459-64.
8. Creugers NH, Kayser AF, van 't Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:448-52.
9. Heffernan MJ AS, Diaz-Arnold AM, et al Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:10-5.
10. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthodont 2008;17:401-8.
11. Nakamura T WK, Zaima C, Nishida H, Kinuta S, Yatani H. . Tensile bond strength between colored-porcelain and sandblasted zirconia framework. J Prosthodont Res 2009;53:116-9.
12. Harding AB NB, Teixeira EC. The Effect of Surface Treatment of the Interfacial Surface on Fatigue-Related Microtensile Bond Strength of Milled Zirconia to Veneering Porcelain. J Prosthodont 2012;21:346-52.
13. Vigolo P MS. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study. J Prosthodont 2012;21:265–9.
14. Örtorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 5-year retrospective study of survival of zirconia single crowns fitted in a private clinical setting. J Dent 2012;40:527–30.
15. Kern T TJ, Schley JS, Wolfart S. . Five-year clinical evaluation of all-ceramic posterior FDPs made of In-Ceram zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:622–4.
16. Isgro G, Wang H, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The effects of thermal mismatch and fabrication procedures on the deflection of layered all-ceramic discs. Dent Mater 2005 ;21:649-55.
17. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26.