Effect of pulpal pressure simulation on dentin bonding of a universal adhesive

Main Article Content

Wimvipha Vichianrat
Choltacha Harnirattisai
Vanthana Sattabanasuk

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the dentin adhesion of a universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal; SBU) applied in either etch-and-rinse (E&R) or self-etch (SE) mode in the situations where 15 cm.H2O hydrostatic pulpal pressure (PP) was simulated during difference bonding and/or storage time.


Materials and Methods: Crown segments of 90 extracted third molars were used, in which direct communication between the PP simulation model and pulp chamber was created. They were divided into 2 groups according to application modes of SBU. Each group was divided into nine subgroups according to three bonded and stored condition (0/0 bonded and stored at 0 pressure, 0/15 bonded at 0, stored at 15 cm.H2O pressure, and 15/15 bonded and stored at 15 cm.H2O pressure) and three storage time (0 min-immediate measurement, 24 h and 3 months), then restored with resin composite. In all groups after storage in water, stick-shaped specimens from each tooth were prepared for micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) test. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p<0.05).


Results: Regardless of the application mode and PP simulation, μTBS values at 24 h were the highest and those at 3 months were the lowest (p<0.05). Generally, the group SE15/15 presented lower μTBS than groups SE0/0. However, the group E&R15/15 showed lower μTBS than group E&R0/0, but not different from that group E&R0/15. Different modes of application revealed similar μTBS at immediate measurement, irrespective of PP simulation (p>0.05). But for longer storage periods, SBU with SE mode seemed to show higher or at least similar μTBS to that with E&R mode.


Conclusion: In conclusion, SBU bonded using SE mode provided similar or better dentin adhesion than that bonded using E&R mode. Simulation of PP during bonding procedure impaired the bond of SBU with SE mode, while PP simulation during storage seemed to have a negative impact on that with E&R mode.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Vichianrat W, Harnirattisai C, Sattabanasuk V. Effect of pulpal pressure simulation on dentin bonding of a universal adhesive . M Dent J [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 25 [cited 2024 Jun. 15];41(Suppl):S35-S46. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mdentjournal/article/view/250883
Section
Oral Presentation(MDRD2024)

References

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.

Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 1-16.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28.

Vaz RR, Hipolito VD, D'Alpino PH, Goes MF. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. J Prosthodont 2012; 21: 101-11.

Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014; 42: 800-7.

Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 44-50.

Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 765-76.

Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, Pashley D. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod 1995; 21: 191-94.

Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin perfusion effects on the shear bond strengths of bonding agents to dentin. Dent Mater 1989; 5:181-84.

Pereira PN, Okuda M, Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 46-53.

Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 47-56.

Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Short- and long-term bonding efficacy of a self-etching, one-step adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 41-5.

Cardoso PE, Sadek FT, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Adhesion testing with the microtensile method: effects of dental substrate and adhesive system on bond strength measurements. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 291-97.

Talic YF. Immediate and 24-hour bond strengths of two dental adhesive systems to three tooth substrates. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003; 4: 28-39.

Staninec M, Kawakami M. Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 204-8.

Sadek FT, Goracci C, Cardoso PE, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 297-302.

.Abdalla AI, Elsayed HY, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 233-38.

Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Yamauti M, Aksornmuang J, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentine. J Dent 2007; 35: 207-13.

Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, Ochala K, Chen C, Fu BP, et al. Defying ageing: An expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives? J Dent 2016; 45: 43-52.

Cuevas-Suarez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 7-26.

Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 2014; 42: 603-12.

Makishi P, Andre CB, Ayres A, Martins AL, Giannini M. Effect of Storage Time on Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Expression of Universal Adhesives Bonded to Dentin and Etched Enamel. Oper Dent 2016; 41: 305-17.

Ivanovic V, Santini A. Rate of formation of tertiary dentin in dogs' teeth in response to lining materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67: 684-88.

Cox CF, White KC, Ramus DL, Farmer JB, Snuggs HM. Reparative dentin: factors affecting its deposition. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 257-70.

Papadogiannis D, Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Gaintantzopoulou MD, Eliades G. Universal Adhesives: Setting Characteristics and Reactivity with Dentin. Materials (Basel) 2019; 12(10); 1720.

Sadek FT, Calheiros FC, Cardoso PE, Kawano Y, Tay F, Ferrari M. Early and 24-hour bond strength and degree of conversion of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 30-4.

Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, et al. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 705-13.

Tichy A, Hosaka K, Abdou A, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Degree of Conversion Contributes to Dentin Bonding Durability of Contemporary Universal Adhesives. Oper Dent 2020; 45: 556-66.