Effects of coffee immersion on translucency of high-strength flowable composites under simulated toothbrushing condition: an in vitro study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of consuming coffee on the translucency of high-strength flowable composites under simulated toothbrushing conditions.
Materials and Methods: Ninety cylindrical specimens were prepared using three types of resin composites: (1) Filtek™ Z350XT (Z); (2) Filtek™ Supreme Flowable (F); (3) G-ænial™ Universal Injectable (G) (diameter 6 mm, thickness 2 mm). 30 specimens of each type were prepared, which then were divided into three subgroups of ten based on testing conditions: artificial saliva (S), coffee (C), and simulated toothbrushing before immersion in coffee (BC). All groups were immersed in their respective solutions at 37°C for 28 days. Translucency parameter (TP) measurements were performed before and after immersion for 7 days and 28 days (triplicate). Three-way repeated ANOVA and Bonferroni statistical tests were applied to the observation data set.
Results: The mean TP of ZC, ZBC, FC, and FBC groups significantly changed after immersion for 7 days, whereas the other groups showed that the TP did not significantly differ from that before immersion. The mean TP difference of groups ZC and FBC was greater than the perceptibility translucency thresholds at day 7. All subgroups of G had TP within the perceptibility translucency thresholds at 7 and 28 days.
Conclusions: Immersion in coffee had no effect on the translucency of G-ænial™ Universal Injectable after 7 or 28 days. G-ænial™ Universal Injectable were found to have suffered the least change in their translucency compared to Filtek™ Z350XT and Filtek™ Supreme Flowable.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Zhou X, Huang X, Li M, Peng X, Wang S, Zhou X, et al. Development and status of resin composite as dental restorative materials. J Appl Polym Sci. 2019 Nov;136(44):48180. doi: 10.1002/app.48180.
Shen C, Rawls HR, Esquivel-Upshaw JF. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021.
Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: a systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):ZE18-24. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129.
Sadeghi M, Lynch CD. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Oper Dent. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):306-311. doi: 10.2341/08-91.
Niyomsujarit N, Worahan A, Chaichalothorn M. Effects of cyclic acid challenge on the surface roughness of various flowable resin composites. M Dent J. 2021 Nov;41(3):187-196.
Geštakovski D.The injectable composite resin technique: Minimally invasive reconstruction of esthetics and function. Clinical case report with 2-year follow-up. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(9):712-719. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a43089.
Sulaiman TA, Rodgers B, Suliman AA, Johnston WM. Color and translucency stability of contemporary resin‐based restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Sep;33(6):899-905. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12640.
Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Translucency and color stability of resin composite and dental adhesives as modeling liquids–A one-year evaluation. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jul;31:e54. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0054.
Agrawal VS, Kapoor S. Color and shade management in esthetic dentistry. Univers Res J Dent. 2013 Sep-Dec;3(3):120-127. doi: 10.4103/2249-9725.123975.
Horn DJ, Bulan-Brady J, Hicks ML. Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade. J Endod. 1998 Dec;24(12):786-790. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80002-2.
Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Mar;101(3):193-199. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60028-7.
Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins—an in vitro study. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e137-e142. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.020.
Salas M, Lucena C, Herrera LJ, Yebra A, Della Bona A, Pérez MM. Translucency thresholds for dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018 Aug;34(8):1168-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.001
Llena C, Fernández S, Forner L. Color stability of nanohybrid resin-based composites, ormocers and compomers. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1071-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1850-z.
Oliveira GU, Mondelli RF, Charantola Rodrigues M, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, Wang L. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):510-516. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500003.
Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(2):102-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00094.x.
Ardu S, Duc O, Di Bella E, Krejci I. Color stability of recent composite resins. Odontology. 2017 Jan;105(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0234-9.
Aydınoğlu A, Yoruç ABH. Effects of silane-modified fillers on properties of dental composite resin. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Oct;79:382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.151.
Sabbagh J, Ryelandt L, Bachérius L, Biebuyck JJ, Vreven J, Lambrechts P, et al. Characterization of the inorganic fraction of resin composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Nov;31(11):1090-1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01352.x.
Păstrav M, Moldovan M, Chisnoiu A, Sarosi C, Filip M, Păstrav O, et al. Influence of filler, monomer matrix and silane coating on composite resin adhesion. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Chemia. 2021;66:225-233. doi: 10.24193/subbchem.2021.4.16.
Zanchi CH, Ogliari FA, Marques e Silva R, Lund RG, Machado HH, Prati C, et al. Effect of the silane concentration on the selected properties of an experimental microfilled composite resin. Appl Adhes Sci. 2015;3(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40563-015-0054-0.
Ertaş E, Güler AU, Yücel AC, Köprülü H, Güler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J. 2006 Jun;25(2):371-376.
Imazato S, Tarumi H, Kato S, Ebi N, Ehara A, Ebisu S. Water sorption, degree of conversion, and hydrophobicity of resins containing Bis-GMA and TEGDMA. Dent Mater J. 1999;18(1):124-132.
Matsumae I, Wakasa K, Satou N, Urabe H, Shintani H, Yamaki M. Effect of TEGDMA content on staining of experimental bis-GMA-based resins. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1995;6:620-623. doi: 10.1007/BF00123440.
Bahbishi N, Mzain W, Badeeb B, Nassar HM. Color stability and micro-hardness of bulk-fill composite materials after exposure to common beverages. Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb;13(3):787. doi: 10.3390/ma13030787.
Poggio C, Vialba L, Berardengo A, Federico R, Colombo M, Beltrami R, et al. Color stability of new esthetic restorative materials: A spectrophotometric analysis. J Funct Biomater. 2017 Jul;8(3):26. doi: 10.3390/jfb8030026.
Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Aug;94(2):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.004.
Awliya WY, Al-Alwani DJ, Gashmer ES, Al-Mandil HB. The Effect of commonly used types of coffee on surface microhardness and color stability of resin-based composite restoration. Saudi Dent J. 2010 Oct;22:177-181. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.07.008.
Takahashi R, Jin J, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(1):75-82. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-160.
Lazaridou D, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1485-1492. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1373-4.