Effects of frequently consumed beverages by children on the surface roughness of glass ionomer-based materials
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the surface roughness changes of various glass ionomer-based restorative materials when exposed to beverages commonly consumed by children.
Materials and Methods: A total of 144 discs (7 x 1.2 mm) were prepared from four different GI-based materials: conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC–Fuji IX), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC–Fuji II LC), zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer (Zr-GI–Zirconomer Improve), and giomer (Beautifil X injectable). Each material group (n=36) was divided into four subgroups (n=9) and immersed in distilled water, grape juice, cola, or chocolate milk for 7 days. The surface roughness values were measured using a non-contact profilometer before and after immersion. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p<0.05).
Results: The surface roughness of the materials ranked from highest to lowest was Zr-GI, GIC, RMGIC, and giomer. No significant differences in surface roughness were observed for any material after 7 days of immersion in the tested solutions.
Conclusion: Exposure to commonly consumed beverages (water, grape juice, cola, and chocolate milk) for one week did not significantly affect the surface roughness of the tested GI-based restorative materials comprising conventional GIC, RMGIC, Zr-GI, and giomer.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
References
Giacaman RA, Fernández CE, Muñoz-Sandoval C, León S, García-Manríquez N, Echeverría C, et al. Understanding dental caries as a non-communicable and behavioral disease: Management implications. Front Oral Health. 2022 Aug;24(3):764479. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.764479.
Bureau of Dental Health. The 8th national oral health survey 2017 of Thailand. Bangkok: Department of Health; 2018. (in Thai)
Waggoner WF, Nelson T. 22 - Restorative Dentistry for the Primary Dentition; In Nowak AJ, editors. Pediatric Dentistry. 6th ed. Elsevier, 2019; p.304-328. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-60826-8.00022-5
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatricrestorative dentistry. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2023; 443-456.
Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials--fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007 Mar;23(3):343-362. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022.
Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):423-429.
Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1996 Jan;12(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80066-2.
Abdulsamee N, Elkhadem AH. Zirconomer and Zirconomer Improved (White Amalgams): Restorative materi- als for the future. Review. EC Dental Science. 2017 Nov;15(4):134-150.
Melo TMTC, Oliveira LR, Brandim AS, Soares LES. Properties of zirconia-containing glass-ionomer cement. Cerâmica. 2019;65:394-399. doi: 10.1590/0366-69132019653752678.
Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):789-795. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009.
Najma Hajira NSW, Meena N. GIOMER- The Intelligent Particle (New generation glass ionomer cement). Int J Dent Oral Health. 2016;2(4) doi: 10.16966/2378-7090.166.
Quader SA, Alam MS, Bashar A, Gafur MA, Al-Mansur MA. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of giomer. Updat Dent Coll J. 2013 Jul;2(2):28-37. doi: 10.3329/updcj.v2i2.15533
Ozdemir-Ozenen D, Sungurtekin-Ekci E, OzenenG, Ozdemir-Karatas M. Effect of common daily acidic beverages on the surface roughness of glass ionomer-based dental restorative biomaterials. Glass Phys Chem. 2019 Nov;45(6):496-502. doi: 10.1134/S1087659619060154
Giti R, Dabiri S, Motamedifar M, Derafshi R. Surface roughness, plaque accumulation, and cytotoxicity of provisional restorative materials fabricated by different methods. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249551.
Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-Based restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;22(6):824-832. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_592_18.
Effendi MC, Nugraeni Y, Hartami E, Ummah AN. Changes in the surface roughness of glass ionomer cement and zirconomer after immersion in carbonated beverages. J Dent Indones. 2020 Aug;27(2):85-90. doi: 10.14693/jdi.v27i2.1155
Vieira A, Lugtenborg M, Ruben JL, Huysmans MC. Brushing abrasion of eroded bovine enamel pretreated with topical fluorides. Caries Res. 2006 Feb;40(3):224-30. doi: 10.1159/000092230.
Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005 May;33(5):389-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.018.
Wunsch NG.[Internet] Types of beverages consumed by children the United States in 2021. United states: Statista; 2021;Apr [cited 2024 May 1] Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1287591/types-of-beverages-consumed-by-children-in-the-us/.
Maganur P, Satish V, Prabhakar AR, Namineni S. Effect of soft drinks and fresh fruit juice on surface roughness of commonly used restorative materials. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Jan-Apr;8(1):1-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1274.
Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Jan;34(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01608.x.
Bal FA, Karaarslan ES, Buldur M, Agaccioglu M, Demir O. Evaluation of surface roughness and color stability of fluorapatite/hydroxyapatite-containing glass carbomer filling material. J Dent Res Rev. 2022 Jul-Sep;9(3):217-223 doi: 10.4103/jdrr.jdrr_45_22.
Alacote-Mauricio B, Gihuaña-Aguilar C, Castro-Ramirez L, Cervantes-Ganoza L, Ladera-Castañeda M, Dapello-Zevallos G, et al. Color stability in a giomer, a conventional glass ionomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer exposed to different pigment beverages: An in vitro comparative study. J Int Oral Health. 2023 Jul;15(4):357-366. doi: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_93_23.
Belevcikli M, Hazar Bodrumlu E. Effects of frequently consumed beverages by children on the surface roughness of compomers. Am J Dent. 2024 Feb;37(1):19-23.
Birant S, Ilisulu SC, Üçüncü MK. Evaluation of glass ionomer restorative materials' surface roughness and microhardness in vitro after acidic challenge. Essent Dent. 2023 Nov;2(3):87-94. doi: 10.5152/EssentDent.2023.23020
Vorburger TV, Rhee HG, Renegar TB, Song JF, Zheng A. Comparison of optical and stylus methods for measurement of surface texture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2007 Feb;33:110–118. doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-0953-8.
Dong WP, Sullivan PJ, Stout KJ. Comprehensive study of parameters for characterising three-dimensional surface topography: IV: Parameters for characterising spatial and hybrid properties. Wear. 1994. Nov;178(1-2):45-60. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(94)90128-7.
Hamouda IM. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Oct;23(5):315-322. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00453.x.
Aliping-McKenzie M, Linden RW, Nicholson JW. The effect of Coca-Cola and fruit juices on the surface hardness of glass-ionomers and 'compomers'. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Nov;31(11):1046-1052. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01348.x.
Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 1997 Feb;18(4):343-349. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(96)00124-x.
Honório HM, Rios D, Francisconi LF, Magalhães AC, Machado MA, Buzalaf MA. Effect of prolonged erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Dec;35(12):947-953. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01856.x.
Cenci MS, Tenuta LM, Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, ten Cate JM, Cury JA. Effect of microleakage and fluoride on enamel-dentine demineralization around restorations. Caries Res. 2008 Sep;42(5):369-379. doi: 10.1159/000151663.
Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-269. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3.
Gharechahi M, Moosavi H, Forghani M. Effect of surface roughness and materials composition. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2012 Oct;3(4A):541-546. doi: 10.4236/jbnb.2012.324056.