Clinical measurement on eyes and periocular areas: A Khon Kaen University study
Main Article Content
Abstract
There is still no available dataset on the dimensions of prefabricated ocular prostheses for the Northeastern Thai population. This pilot study aimed to report on pupil positioning, iris and scleral dimensions, and lateral eye curvatures among individuals at the Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University. It also explored the correlations between these measurements and key demographic variables, including age groups and gender. A total of 276 healthy participants were categorized by gender and further subdivided into three age groups: 20–30, 31–50, and >50 years. Standardized photography was conducted in a well-lit room. A Whibal card with a 10-mm scale was held perpendicularly to the subject. Its inner edge was positioned adjacent to the right nostril, and its top edge was placed 1 cm below the lower eyelid. Measurements included interpupillary distance (IPD), outer canthal distance (OCD), intercanthal distance (ICD), palpebral fissure width (PFW), palpebral fissure height (PFH), iris size, and the angles between the upper and lower eyelids. Group comparisons were conducted using t-tests and one-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s post hoc tests (p = 0.05). Gender significantly influenced IPD, OCD, PFW, and the upper-lower eyelid angle. Age significantly affected iris size, which was larger in the 20–30 group than in the >50 group. PFH was greater in the 20–30 group than in the >50 group and lower in the >50 group than in the 31–50 group. The upper-lower eyelid angle was more obtuse in the >50 group than in the 20–30 group. Males exhibited age-related differences in IPD, PFW, and eyelid angle, while females showed variations in iris size and PFH. These findings provide baseline periocular measurements which can be utilized to enhance the accuracy of stock ocular prostheses for the Northeastern Thai population.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Shah RM, Coutinho I, Chitre V, Aras MA. The ocular prosthesis: A novel technique using digital photography. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14(Suppl 1):248–254. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0310-6.
Modugno A, Mantelli F, Sposato S, Moretti C, Lambiase A, Bonini S. Ocular prostheses in the last century: a retrospective analysis of 8018 patients. Eye (Lond). 2013 Jul;27(7):865-870. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.97.
Sohal KS, Shubi F. Early post-operative complications in surgeries pertaining oral and maxillofacial region in MNH, Tanzania. Surg Sci. 2015 Oct;6(10):470–477. doi: 10.4236/ss.2015.610068
Raizada K, Rani D. Ocular prosthesis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007 Jul;30(3):152-162. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.01.002.
Patil SB, Kale SM, Math M, Khare N, Sumeet J. Anthropometry of the eyelid and palpebral fissure in an Indian population. Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Mar;31(3):290-294. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11398475.
Astley SJ, Clarren SK. Measuring the facial phenotype of individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure: correlations with brain dysfunction. Alcohol Alcohol. 2001 Mar-Apr;36(2):147-159. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/36.2.147.
Choubisa D. A simplified approach to rehabilitate an ocular defect: Ocular prosthesis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):89-94. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.179260.
Park DH, Choi WS, Yoon SH, Song CH. Anthropometry of Asian eyelids by age. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Apr;121(4):1405-1413. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000304608.33432.67.
Rana K, Beecher MB, Caltabiano C, Zhao Y, Verjans J, Selva D. Normal periocular anthropometric measurements in an Australian population. Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;43(8):2695-2701. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02669-3.
Preechawai P. Anthropometry of eyelid and orbit in four Southern Thailand ethnic groups. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Feb;94(2):193-199. http://www.jmatonline.com/view.php?id=4074
Sirimaharaj W, Saengthong-Aram P, Chumkong C, Chinnachotleesakul N, Nakkhanthong N, Suri N. Anthropometric study of facial morphology in Northern Thai population aged 1 to 18 years old to inform the timing of craniofacial reconstruction. J Med Assoc Thai. 2021 Oct;104(10):1639–1647. doi: 10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.10.12897
Vasanthakumar P, Kumar P, Rao M. Anthropometric analysis of palpebral fissure dimensions and its position in South Indian ethnic adults. Oman Med J. 2013 Jan;28(1):26-32. doi: 10.5001/omj.2013.06.
Kunjur J, Sabesan T, Ilankovan V. Anthropometric analysis of eyebrows and eyelids: An inter-racial study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;44(2):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.03.020.
Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G, et al. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Jul;16(4):615-646. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e.
Yildirim Y, Sahbaz I, Kar T, Kagan G, Taner MT, Armagan I, et al. Evaluation of interpupillary distance in the Turkish population. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 3;9:1413-1416. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S85584.
Ma H, Chen Y, Cai X, Tang Z, Nie C, Lu R. Effect of aging in periocular appearances by comparison of anthropometry between early and middle adulthoods in Chinese Han population. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Dec;72(12):2002-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.07.030.
Cooke NT. Significance of arcus senilis in Caucasians. J R Soc Med. 1981 Mar;74(3):201-204. doi: 10.1177/014107688107400308.
Spors F, Egan DJ, McNaughton LE, Shen J, Lampa MJ. Is the use of empirically designed custom soft contact lenses a good option for challenging patients? Open J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;3(3):54–60. doi: 10.4236/ojoph.2013.33014.
Kadir SMU. Contracted socket and lower fornix reconstruction: An oculoplastic challenge. IP Int J Ocul Oncol Oculoplasty. 2022 Nov 28;8(2):88–90. Doi: 10.18231/j.ijooo.2022.020
Amornvit P, Goveas R, Rokaya D, Bajracharya S. Assistance of pressure conformer for reconstruction of lower fornix. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):ZD18-20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8390.5012.
Phan Hoang H, Janebodin K, Charoonpatrapong K, Tanveer W, Sipiyaruk K, Chotprasert N. Factors affecting dimensions of the 3D ocular prosthesis in patients rehabilitated at Mahidol University. M Dent J. 2018 Jan-Apr;38(1):57-64. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mdentjournal/article/view/179248
Reinhard J, Urban P, Bell S, Carpenter D, Sagoo MS. Automatic data-driven design and 3D printing of custom ocular prostheses. Nature Communications. Nat Commun. 2024 Feb27;15(1):1360. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45345-5.