An Evaluation Pertaining to Esophageal Speech Outcomes in Alaryngeal Patients
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have reported on the treatment of alaryngeal patients in order to improve their speech in several ways, but little focus was placed on esophageal speech.
Objectives: To determine the time duration of esophageal speech training after which alaryngeal patients can speak, and to analyze the factors affecting esophageal speech training outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective study, 29 alaryngeal patients who visited the Speech Clinic at Ramathibodi Hospital participated in the study. Data were collected from patients’ medical records after speech therapy with the esophageal speech and the combination of esophageal speech and electrolarynx. Data was analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: Of 29 alaryngeal patients, 7 patients from the esophageal speech group and 6 patients from the combination of esophageal speech and electrolarynx training group could produce a first speech sound. The median duration of time that alaryngeal patients needed to speak after esophageal speech training was 11 weeks. Chemotherapy and the frequency of speech training sessions were factors that significantly affected the time durations needed by alaryngeal patients who succeeded in speaking because of esophageal speech training (P < .05). Alaryngeal patients who were not treated with chemotherapy and attended speech training sessions more than once per month had shorter time durations for esophageal speech training than the others.
Conclusions: Alaryngeal patients could speak after esophageal speech training for at least 11 weeks. Chemotherapy and frequency of speech training sessions impacted esophageal speech training outcomes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Dardarananda R. Speech after laryngectomy. In: Dardarananda R, Akamanon C, Dechongkit S, eds. Speech Disorders. Ruenkaew Printing; 1986:77-86.
Casper JK, Colton RH. Clinical Manual for Laryngectomy and Head/Neck Cancer Rehabilitation. Singular Publishing Group; 1993.
Keith RL, Darley FL. Laryngectomy Rehabilitation. College-Hill Press; 1979.
Chaitima N. The Study of Speech Rate and Some Related Factors of Normal and Esophageal Speakers. Master’s thesis. Mahidol University; 1990.
Rammage L, Morrison M. Nichol H. Management of the Voice and Its Disorders. 2nd ed. Singular Thomson Learning; 2001.
Diedrich WM, Youngstrom KA. Alaryngeal Speech. Charles C. Thomas; 1966.
Crouse GP. An Experimental Study of Esophageal and Artificial Larynx Speech. Master’s thesis. Emory University; 1962.
Snidecor JC. Speech Rehabilitation of the Laryngectomized. Charles C. Thomas; 1968.
Stajner-Katusić S, Horga D, Musura M, Globlek D. Voice and speech after laryngectomy. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20(2-3):195-203. doi:10.1080/02699200400026975
Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Stringer SP, et al. Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy and postoperative radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(10):2500-2505. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.07.047
Singer S, Wollbrück D, Dietz A, et al. Speech rehabilitation during the first year after total laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2013;35(11):1583-1590. doi:10.1002/hed.23183
Lertsarunyapong S, Pracharitpukdee N, Supanakorn S. Assessment of the respiratory control and the esophageal speech ability in Thai laryngectomee after Thai esophageal speech training. Chula Med J. 2005;49(1):27-36. Accessed September 9, 2022. http://clmjournal.org/_fileupload/journal/200-2-3.pdf
Keith RL, Ewert JC, Flowers CR. Factors influencing the learning of esophageal speech. Br J Disord Commun. 1974;9(2):110-116. doi:10.3109/13682827409011616
Salmon SJ. Factors predictive of success or failure in acquisition of esophageal speech. Head Neck Surg. 1988;10(S2):S105-S109. doi:10.1002/hed.2890100806
Frith C, Buffalo MD, Montague JC Jr. Relationships between esophageal speech proficiency and surgical, biographical, and social factors. J Commun Disord. 1985;18(6):475-483. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(85)90034-6
Kresić S, Veselinović M, Mumović G, Mitrović SM. Possible factors of success in teaching esophageal speech. Med Pregl. 2015;68(1-2):5-9. doi:10.2298/mpns1502005k
Thai Speech-Language and Hearing Association. Ethic of speech-language pathology and audiology. Khon Kaen Printing; 2000.
Chen Q, Luo J, Li JP, et al. Influence of collective esophageal speech training on self-efficacy in Chinese laryngectomees: a pretest-posttest group study. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39(5):810-815. doi:10.1007/s11596-019-2109-0
Damste PH. Oesophageal Speech after Laryngectomy (Slokdarmspraak). University of Groningen; 1958. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/34230371/P.H.Damste.pdf
Karomprat A, Chaichan P, Santawesuk U, Sookprasert A. Symptoms, symptom management and outcome in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. SRIMEDJ. 2017;32(4):326-331. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SRIMEDJ/article/view/96698
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline Task Force, Ahn SH, Hong HJ, et al. Guidelines for the surgical management of laryngeal cancer: Korean society of thyroid-head and neck surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;10(1):1-43. doi:10.21053/ceo.2016.01389
Gilmore SI. Failure in acquiring esophageal speech. In: Salmon SJ, Mount KH, eds. Alaryngeal Speech Rehabilitation: For Clinicians by Clinicians. Pro-Ed Austin, Tex; 1991:193-228.
Brook I. The Laryngectomee Guide. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2013. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://www.entnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/LaryngectomeeGuide.pdf