Validation of the Thai Version of ICIQ-VS (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire -Vaginal symptoms) in Thai Women

Main Article Content

Wilailak Sriwat
Jittima Manonai
Chatchawan Sillaphakit
Sirirat Sarit-apirak
Apichart Chittacharoen


Objective: To determine the psychometric properties of the Thai version of international Consultation on Incontinence Questionaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS).

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observation study. Women who attended the urogynecology clinic, whether or not they complaining of vaginal symptoms were enrolled. Participants completed the Thai version of ICIQ-VS before being examined by the gynecologists according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. About 2 weeks later, the participants who had no treatment returned to the clinic for completion of the retest questionnaire.

Results: Eighty-six women with a mean age of 54.4 years were recruited. The final Thai version of ICIQ-VS questionnaire was developed. It demonstrated good psychometric properties (validity and reliability). With regard to the construct validity, there were statistically significant difference between the symptomatic group (ICIQ-VS 5a > 0) and the asymptomatic group (ICIQ-VS 5a = 0) assessed by vaginal symptom score (VSS) (P < 0.001), sexual matter score (SMS) (P < 0.001) and quality of life (QoLS) (P < 0.001). The test-retest reliability was considered moderate to excellent for all questions.

Conclusion: The Thai version of ICIQ-VS was successfully validated and could assess the severity of pelvic organ prolapse according to the questionnaire score.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sriwat, W., Manonai, J., Sillaphakit, C., Sarit-apirak, S., & Chittacharoen, A. (1). Validation of the Thai Version of ICIQ-VS (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire -Vaginal symptoms) in Thai Women. Ramathibodi Medical Journal, 39(1), 1-13. Retrieved from
Original Articles


1. Swift S, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):795-806.

2. Whitcomb EL, Rortveit G, Brown JS, et al. Racial differences in pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(6):1271-7.

3. Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037-45. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0902-1.

4. Chuenchompoonut V, Bunyavejchevin S, Wisawasukmongchol W, Taechakraichana N. Prevalence of genital prolapse in Thai menopausal women (using new standardization classification). J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:1-4.

5. Piya-Anant M, Therasakvichya S, Leelaphatanadit C, Techatrisak K. Integrated health research program for the Thai elderly: prevalence of genital prolapse and effectiveness of pelvic floor exercise to prevent worsening of genital prolapse in elderly women. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003;86:509-15.

6. Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG. 2005;112(7):971-6.

7. Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113(6):700-12.

8. Tamanini JT, Almeida FG, Girotti ME, Riccetto CL, Palma PC, Rios LA. The Portuguese validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS) for Brazilian women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(10):1385-91. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0641-8.

9. Banerjee C, Banerjee M, Hatzmann W, et al. The German version of the 'ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire' (German ICIQ-VS): an instrument validation study. Urol Int. 2010;85(1):70-9. doi:10.1159/000316337.

10. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10-7.

11. Barber MD, Neubauer NL, Klein-Olarte V. Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):942-8.

12. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32.

13. Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D. Inter-observer reliability of digital vaginal examination using a four-grade scale in different patient positions. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(9):1303-7. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0635-6.

14. Hagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Stark D, Bugge C. Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score. BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(1):25-31. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01903.x.

15. Cam C, Sancak P, Karahan N, Sancak A, Celik C, Karateke A. Validation of the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(1):104-7. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.016.

16. Hashim H, Avery K, Mourad MS, Chamssuddin A, Ghoniem G, Abrams P. The Arabic ICIQ-UI SF: an alternative language version of the English ICIQ-UI SF. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(3):277-282. doi:10.1002/nau.20212.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>