Intraoperative Outcomes of Intra-Umbilical Incision VS Infra-Umbilical Incision in Post-Partum Tubal Sterilization: A Randomized Control Trial Study

Main Article Content

Watcharin Chirdchim
Preecha Wanichsetakul
Komsun Suwannarurk
Jayanton Patumanond

Abstract

Background: Post-partum tubal resection is a popular method of permanent contraception. Surgeons make a mini-transverse skin incision just below an umbilicus (infra-umbilicus or sub-umbilicus). Skin incision inside an umbilicus (intra-umbilicus) is not usually practiced because believes that it was difficult, dirty and increase risk of infection. Now a day has introduced abdominal surgery under the scope, particularly a single port surgery, which an incision was made inside the umbilicus. That operation has been proved efficient and safe. An incision wound was invisible post-operatively and an increase in wound infections has not been reported when compared to infra-umbilical skin incision


Objectives: To compare intraoperative time, aesthetic scores of an incision wound and complications in post-partum tubal resection under infra-umbilical and intra-umbilical skin incision.


Methods: This was a randomized control trial conducted in Prapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi, Thailand. Patients (n = 30) with informed consents were randomly assigned to one of the two skin incision techniques for post-partum sterilization (n = 15 for each arm) which operated by Six year medical students. Surgical times were recorded. Wound aesthetic assessment was made by the patients one week after the operation using the “Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scores” (POSAS), which compares the wound in reference to the nearby skin. t-tests or exact probability statistical tests were used.


Results: The operative times were also shorter (24.9 ± 6.3 VS 41.6 ± 13.2 minutes, P < 0.001). Patient scar assessment score in intra-umbilical incisions were significantly closer to normal skin than infra-umbilical incisions (7.8 ± 1.6 VS 14.5 ± 2.4, P < 0.001). Similar direction was also observed for overall option of the scar compared to normal skin scores (1.7 ± 0.7 VS 3.3 ± 0.9, P < 0.001). Neither intra-abdominal injuries nor wound infections were observed.


Conclusions: Post-partum sterilization under intra-umbilical skin incision was more efficient in regards to aesthetic concerns and consumed less operation times.  

Article Details

How to Cite
Chirdchim, W., Wanichsetakul, P., Suwannarurk, K., & Patumanond, J. (2017). Intraoperative Outcomes of Intra-Umbilical Incision VS Infra-Umbilical Incision in Post-Partum Tubal Sterilization: A Randomized Control Trial Study. Ramathibodi Medical Journal, 40(3), 29-37. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ramajournal/article/view/82596
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Herbert B. Peterson, Amy E. Pollack, Jeffrey S. Warshaw. Tubal Sterilization. In: John A. Rock, Howard W. Jones III, eds. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:609-628.

2. Park SY, Kim KH, Yuk JS, Ji HY, Lee JH. Skin closure methods after single port laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;189:8-12. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.014.

3. Lee JS, Hong TH, Kim JG. A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;83(6):360-366. doi:10.4174/jkss.2012.83.6.360.

4. Phongnarisorn C, Chinthakanan O. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments in patients with symptomatic leiomyoma and/or adenomyosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(4):893-900. doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1770-0.

5. Arslan S, Korkut E. The intra-umbilical approach in umbilical hernia. Eurasian J Med. 2014;46(1):32-35. doi:10.5152/eajm.2014.06.

6. Angioni S, Pontis A, Sedda F, et al. Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:1575-80. doi:10.2147/OTT.S82570.

7. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):1960-1965.

8. Matsui Y, Satoi S, Hirooka S, Kon M. Simple suturing technique for umbilical dimple wound after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(4):e61-3. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.006.

9. Song T, Cho J, Kim TJ, et al. Cosmetic outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy compared with multi-port surgery: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(4):460-7. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.010.

10. Satyapan S, Varakamin S, Suwannus P, Chalapati S, Onthuam Y, Dusitsin N. Postpartum tubal ligation by nurse--midwives in Thailand: a field trial. Stud Fam Plann. 1983;14(4):115-118.

11. Dusitsin N, Chalapati S, Varakamin S, Boonsiri B, Ningsanon P, Gray RH. Post-partum tubal ligation by nurse-midwives and doctors in Thailand. Lancet. 1980;1(8169):638-639.