ทัศนคติของสูตินรีแพทย์ต่อกฎหมายว่าด้วยความผิดฐานทำให้แท้งลูกและแนวทางภายใต้กฎหมาย
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this survey research were to study attitudes of OB-GYN doctors towards Thai abortion law and appropriate solutions to explain general characteristics and experiences of the subjects to evaluate the knowledge level about Thai abortion law and to determine the associations between these factors. A total of 68 OB-GYN doctors who worked in Phramongkutklao Hospital and Rajchavithi Hospital from 15th December 2003 to 20th January 2004 were the subjects in this study. Close-ended questionnaires were used for data collection and were distributed by the researcher. Frequency percentage mean and standard deviation were applied to describethe subjects. Pearson’s product moment correlation was used to test the hypotheses. The results indicated that more than two thirds (72.1%) of the participants had attitudes towards Thai abortion law at a moderate level. Also 54.4% of them had attitudes towards solutions available for this law at a moderate level. It was found that only 23.5% of them had a high knowledge level about Thai abortion law. There was a significantly positive correlation between attitudes towards Thai abortion law and attitudes towards solution of this law (p<0.05). Moreover it was revealed that age and knowledge were positively related to attitude towards Thai abortion law (p<0.05). Conversely there was no correlation between experience and attitudes towards Thai abortion law and the solutions to a pregnancy available under current Thai abortion law.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
บุนนาค อ. ทัศนคติของสูตินรีแพทย์ต่อกฎหมายว่าด้วยความผิดฐานทำให้แท้งลูกและแนวทางภายใต้กฎหมาย. RTA Med. J. [internet]. 2013 Sep. 19 [cited 2026 Feb. 9];59(4):219-30. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rtamedj/article/view/11787
Section
นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ (Original Article)
Articles in this journal are copyrighted by the Royal Thai Army Medical Department and published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
may be read and used for academic purposes, such as teaching, research, or citation, with proper credit given to the author and the journal.
Use or modification of the articles is prohibited without permission.
Statements expressed in the articles are solely the opinions of the authors.
Authors are fully responsible for the content and accuracy of their articles.
Any other republication of the articles requires permission from the journal.