The Evaluation of the Orientation Project for Being a Good Government Officer

Main Article Content

วัลทณี นาคศรีสังข์
สไบทิพย์ เชื้อเอี่ยม


This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Orientation Project for Being a Good Government Officer organized by the Boromarajonanai College of Nursing, Chakriraj, using the CIPP model. The sample included 200 new government officers from 10 provinces, which were Nonthaburi, Kanchanaburi, Nakhon Pathom, Suphanburi, Ratchaburi, Phetchaburi, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Samut Sakhon, Samutsongkram, Samut Songkhram, and Krabi. Data were collected by conducting an in-depth interview and questionnaires. Later, data were analyzed using content analysis, frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and paired t-tests were applied to compare self-assessment scores on competency.

The results revealed that an alignment between curriculum and the project’s objectives was recognized at the highest level (gif.latex?\bar{x} =4.24, SD =.51) for the context aspect. For the input aspect, speakers’ competency was highly recognized (gif.latex?\bar{x} =4.49, SD =.54). The highest score of the process aspect was an appropriateness of place (gif.latex?\bar{x} =4.46, SD=.55). All items of the product aspect were rated at the highest level including overall satisfaction (gif.latex?\tilde{x} =4.53, SD=.56), worthiness of this project (gif.latex?\bar{x} =4.53, SD=.53), followed by the applicability of content into practice (gif.latex?\bar{x} =4.42, SD=.55) and the increase of knowledge (gif.latex?\bar{x} =4.36, SD=.56) Furthermore, the posttest scores of attendants’ competency to become good government officers improved significantly (p<.01) when compared to the pretest scores. The strengths of this project were the speakers’ expertise and attendants’ participation, whereas, the weakness of this project was the significant amount of time consumed during the field trip.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
นาคศรีสังข์ ว, เชื้อเอี่ยม ส. The Evaluation of the Orientation Project for Being a Good Government Officer. NJPH (วารสาร พ.ส.) [Internet]. 2019 Dec. 20 [cited 2022 Dec. 8];29(3):156-70. Available from:


1. Office of the Civil Service Commission. Civil Service Act of B.E.2551. Bangkok: Global Inter Communication Co., Ltd. 2008. (in Thai).

2. Office of the Civil Service Commission. Handbook for conducting experiments on government duties [internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 June 5]. Available from:

3. Praboromarajchanok Institute. Mission of Praboromarajchanok Institute [internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 June 5]. Available from:

4. Personnel Development Group of Praboromarajchanok Institute. Handbook for orientation project for being a good government officer. Praboromarajchanok Institute of Ministry of Public Health. 2017. (in Thai).

5. The Strategy and Quality Assurance department of Boromarajonanicollege of nursing Chakriraj. Strategic plan for fiscal year 2017-2021. Boromarajonanicollege of Nursing Chakriraj. 2017. (in Thai).

6. Testing and Evaluation Center for Educational and Professional Development, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University. Project evaluation model [internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 April 21]. Available from:

7. Stufflebeam D L, Madam C F, Kellaghan T. The CIPP model for evaluation in Evaluation model. Boston MA: Kluwer Academic; 2000.

8. Dasa J. Research report on assessment and follow-up of the Master of Education Program Science Education (Plan B). Srinakharinwirot University. Center for Science Education of Srinakharinwirot University. 2010. (in Thai).

9. Suebsotr C. Alternative : Evaluation of village fund through CIPP Model application: a case study of Ban Getho Village Fund of Kathu District, Phuket Province [Master thesis]. Bangkok: Khonkaen University. 2008. (in Thai).

10. Narongmee P. The CIPP Model for Evaluation of the Allowance of the Elderly : A Case Studyof Nonthaburi Municipality [Master thesis]. Bangkok: Thammasat University. 2011. (in Thai).

11. ApisamphonYothin P. Study of the results of the social skills promotion project “Hail Trip”. Faculty of Medicine. Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University. 2007. (in Thai).

12. Ho W W, Chen W J, Ho C K, Lee M B, Chen C C, Chou F C. Evaluation ofthe suicide prevention program in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, using the CIPP evaluation model. CMHJ 2011;47:542-50.

13. PhromShui S. Project evaluation techniques. Bangkok: Chatuphon Design; 2009. (in Thai).

14. Saiyot L, Saiyot A. Educational research techniques. 5thed, Bangkok: Academic Support Center; 2010. (in Thai).

15. Ministry of Interior. Internal Trainer. Bangkok: Department of Lands. 2018. (in Thai).

16. Boonvas K, Khumtorn L, Suppasri J. Enhancing reflective learning practices : implication for faculty development program, Southern College Network, Praboromarajchanok Institute. Nursing Journal of the Ministry of Public Health 2016;26(3)sep-dec:131-43.

17. Boriboon W. Development of Core Competencies by the Participation of Supervisors. Journal of Health Science 2016;25(5):872-77. (in Thai).

18. Boonnnuch R. Development and training affectingthe employee’s effectiveness : case study provincial electricit authority area 1 (central region) phra nakhon si ayutthaya province [Master thesis]. Pathum Thani : Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. 2013. (in Thai).