Factors Causing Allergies from Non-ionic Contrast Media Agents in Computed Tomography

Authors

  • Wayupa Wongwikom National Cancer Institute

Keywords:

Contrast media agents, Computed tomography Scan (CT scan), Age groups, Gender

Abstract

Background: Injecting contrast media into the body for computed tomography increases the clarity of organs, helping to make the diagnosis more accurate. This may cause allergic reactions to contrast media agents. The researcher was therefore interested in studying the factors of allergic reactions to non-ionic contrast media. Objective: This prospective study aimed to analyse prevalence and risk factors in non-ionic contrast associated allergic reactions in patients. Method: The sample of 400 patients under computed tomography was collected from a record database between April 2023 - July 2023. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, numbers, percentages. The research tool was computed tomography examination was collected from a record database (sex, age). Factors determining association between allergic and non-ionic contrast were collected, those include high creatinine or low eGFR, hypertension, asthma, seafood allergies, history of contrast media allergy. Results: It was found that there were more female patients than males in both age groups. Only in the age group of 46-70 years. Data on risk factors found that hypertension accounting for 15.0%, had an allergic reaction to contrast media agents accounting for 2.25%, high creatinine or low eGFR accounting for 1.0%, seafood allergy accounting for 0.5%, respectively. While males were found to have hypertension accounting for 7.0%, high creatinine or low eGFR accounting for 0.5%, allergic to seafood accounting for 0.25%, ever allergic to contrast media agents accounting for 0.00%, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the study found that among the 5 patients, accounting for 1.25%, they were allergic to the contrast media agents which no risk factors mentioned above were found. As for the patient who was allergic to contrast media agents, 1 patient, accounting for 0.25%, had hypertension risk factors out of 90 hypertensive patients, all 6 of whom were patients in the age group of 46 - 70 years.

References

Jenjitranant P, Kaewlai R. Iodinated contrast medium in clinical neurology practice: all questions answered. J Thai Stroke Soc 2017;16(1):23-43.

Singh J, Daftary A. Iodinated contrast media and their adverse reactions. J Nucl Med Technol 2008;36(2):69-74.

Yamane T. Statistics: an introductory analysis. New York: New York: Harper & Row; 1973.

Janpanich S. Patients diagnosis using computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic field imaging (MRI) Care. Siriraj Med J 2016;3(2):149-58.

Kanlayanawut N. Guidelines regarding monitoring of adverse reactions not related to the kidneys or an allergy to radiopaque substances. [Internet].2022 [cited 2023 Sep 18]. Available from: https://www. pranangklao.go.th/webpnk60/images/Appmanual/ am-70.pdf

Lee SY, Kang DY, Kim JY, Yoon SH, Choi YH, Lee W, et al. Incidence and risk factors of immediate hypersensitivity reactions associated with low-osmolar iodinated contrast media: a longitudinal study based on a realtime monitoring system. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2019;29(6):444-50.

Downloads

Published

15-03-2024

How to Cite

1.
Wongwikom W. Factors Causing Allergies from Non-ionic Contrast Media Agents in Computed Tomography. J DMS [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 15 [cited 2024 Apr. 30];49(1):141-5. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDMS/article/view/265204

Issue

Section

Original Article