Prevalence and Associated Factors of Neonatal Microcephaly in Thailand, 2014-2018

Authors

  • Tassana Thammaros Field Epidemiology Training Program, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
  • Kittiphan Chalom Field Epidemiology Training Program, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Wanna Hanshaoworakul Field Epidemiology Training Program, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Phanthanee Thitichai Field Epidemiology Training Program, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Patcharin Tantiworrawit Field Epidemiology Training Program, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Sathirakorn Pongpanich College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v12i3.262958

Keywords:

prevalence, neonatal, microcephaly, Thailand

Abstract

Microcephaly became of high concern after Zika outbreaks occurred worldwide. An estimation of its prevalence is crucial for public health preparedness and response. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of neonatal microcephaly in Thailand during 2014-2018, describe its epidemiological characteristics, and identify associated factors. This study was a cross-sectional study using data from the Health Data Center, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Neonatal microcephaly, as defined in this study, is a condition where a newborn has a head circumference (HC) less than the 3rd percentile of the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century standard head circumference charts for term newborn, and Fenton's growth charts for preterm newborn by gestational age and gender. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify associated factors. During 2014-2018, 121,448 newborns were identified and the prevalence of neonatal microcephaly was 14.5%. There were 9,871 boys and 7,687 girls. Multivariate analysis showed that small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio (Adjusted OR) 5.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.24, 8.81), birth length less than the 10th percentile (Adjusted OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.36, 6.29), elderly pregnancy (Adjusted OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.07, 3.18), and primigravida (Adjusted OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.37, 2.95) were significantly associated with neonatal microcephaly. The prevalence of neonatal microcephaly in Thailand was higher than expected. The international head circumference chart may not be suitable for Thai newborns suggesting that a head circumference growth standard for Thai newborns is needed.

References

National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Major birth defects data from populationbased birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2006-2010. Birth Defects Research (Part A): Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2013;97:S1-S172.

Kinsman SL, Johnston MV. Congenital Anomalies of the Central Nervous System. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, Geme JWS, Schor NF, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 20 ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. p. 2802-19.

World Health Organization. Microcephaly [cited 2019 Jan 9]. <http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/microcephaly/en/>

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Microcephaly [cited 2019 Jan 14]. <https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseasesconditions/microcephaly/symptomscauses/syc-20375051>

Alfaro-Murillo JA, Parpia AS, Fitzpatrick MC, Tamagnan JA, Medlock J, Ndeffo-Mbah ML, et al. A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 May; 10(5): e0004743. Epub 2016 May 20

Hansen M, Armstrong PK, Bower C, Baynam GS. Prevalence of microcephaly in an Australian population-based birth defects register, 1980-2015. Med J Aust. 2017;206(8):351-6.

Morris JK, Rankin J, Garne E, Loane M, Greenlees R, Addor M-C, et al. Prevalence of microcephaly in Europe: population based study. BMJ [Internet]. 2016; 354. <http://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i4721.abstract.>

Hinjoy S, Kongyu S, Poonkesorn S, Sangwanloy S. Statistical correlations between infection of dengue viruses, chikungunya virus, measles, rubella and children with microcephaly less than one year of age in Thailand. Disease control journal. 2014;42(4):280-9.

World Health Organization. Zika virus [cited 2019 Jan 14]. < https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/zika-virus.>

World Health Organization. Screening, assessment and management of neonates and infants with complications associated with Zika virus exposure in utero [cited 2019 Jan 14]. <http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/zika/assessment-infants/en/.>

de Araújo TVB, Ximenes RAdA, Miranda-Filho DdB, Souza WV, Montarroyos UR, de Melo APL, et al. Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a casecontrol study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;18(3):328-36.

Zika Situation Awareness Team, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Situation of Zika virus report. Nonthaburi, Thailand; 2017 Mar 31.

Accardo PJ, Jaworski M. Heads Up: Plotting Children's Head Circumference. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;156(6):871-2.

Adiele DF, Elem UO. Biostatistical analysis of birth weight and head circumference of babies a case study of Nigeria. Global Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 2013;12(1):5-12.

Shajari H, Marsoosy V, Aslani M, Mohammad M, Heshmaty P. The effect of maternal age, gestational age and parity on the size of the newborn. Acta Medica Iranica. 2006;44(6):400-4.

Kirchengast S, Hartmann B. Impact of maternal age and maternal somatic characteristics on newborn size. Am J Hum Biol. 2003;15(2):220-8.

Neggers Y, Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP, Hoffman HJ, Cutter GR. The relationship between maternal and neonatal anthropometric measurements in term newborns. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1995;85(2):192-6.

Polzlberger E, Hartmann B, Hafner E, Stumpflein I, Kirchengast S. Maternal Height and Pre-Pregnancy Weight Status Are Associated with Fetal Growth Patterns and Newborn Size. J Biosoc Sci. 2017;49(3):392-407.

Sutan R, Luu Yeong M, Mahdy Z, Ahmad S, Rohana J, Ishak S, et al. Trend of head circumference as a predictor of microcephaly among term infants born at a regional center in Malaysia between 2011-2015. Research and Reports in Neonatology. 2018; 8:9-17.

Geraedts EJ, van Dommelen P, Caliebe J, Visser R, Ranke MB, van Buuren S, et al. Association between head circumference and body size. Hormone research in paediatrics. 2011;75(3):213-9.

Saunders CL, Lejarraga H, del Pino M. Assessment of head size adjusted for height: an anthropometric tool for clinical use based on Argentinian data. Annals of human biology. 2006;33(4):415-23.

Strategic and Planning Division of Ministry of Public Health. Manual for collecting and transferring health data, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand [cited 2019 Jan 27]. <http://planning.anamai.moph.go.th/download/D_DataMarts/43/50-file-structurev2.1.pdf.>

Strategic and Planning Division of Ministry of Public Health. Service provider code [cited 2019 Apr 15]. <http://203.157.10.8/hcode_2014/query_02.php?p=3.>

The Royal College of Pediatricians of Thailand and Paediatric Society of Thailand. Guidance for the Evaluation and Management of Infants with Possible Congenital Zika Virus Infection 2016 [cited 2019 Jan 9]. <http://www.ped.si.mahidol.ac.th/HA/CPG/GuidelineCongenitalZikaSyndrome19-9-59.pdf.>

The University of Oxford. International Newborn Size Standards [cited 2019 Jan 14]. <https://intergrowth21.tghn.org/newborn-sizebirth/#ns1.>

Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatrics. 2013;13(1):59.

Nantais-Smith LM, Herrington CJ. Assessing Growth Parameters in the Newborn: Identifying Abnormal Findings. In: Bellini S, Beaulieu M, editors. Neonatal Advanced Practice Nursing: A Case-Based Learning Approach. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. p. 55-68.

Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL, Heazell AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186287 Epub 2017 Oct 17

WHO/IASO/IOTF. The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Melbourne: Health Communications Australia; 2000.

Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet (London,England). 2004;363(9403):157-63.

Bureau of Vector Borne Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Zika infection report. Nonthaburi 2017.

ICD10data. Microcephaly Q02 [cited 2019 Apr 15]. <https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/Q00-Q99/Q00-Q07/Q02->

Thammaros T. The neonatal microcephaly reporting system evaluation in Samutsakhon Province, January 2017, why data quality is important. The 9th TEPHINET Global Scientific Conference Aug 7-11; Chiang Mai, Thailand2017. p. 356.

Cheng Y, Leung TY, Lao T, Chan YM, Sahota DS. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicityspecific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2016;123 Suppl 3:48-55.

Dwipoerwantoro PG, Mansyur M, Oswari H, Makrides M, Cleghorn G, Firmansyah A. Growth of Indonesian Infants Compared With World Health Organization Growth Standards. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61(2):248-52.

Poon WB, Fook-Chong SM, Ler GY, Loh ZW, Yeo CL. Creation and validation of the Singapore birth nomograms for birth weight, length and head circumference based on a 12-year birth cohort. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2014;43(6):296-304.

Bonakdar SA, Dorosty Motlagh AR, Bagherniya M, Ranjbar G, Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara R, Mohajeri SAR, et al. Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Maternal Nutrition in Relation to Infant Birth Size. Clinical nutrition research. 2019;8(2):129-37.

Gondwe A, Ashorn P, Ashorn U, Dewey KG, Maleta K, Nkhoma M, et al. Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and maternal gestational weight gain are positively associated with birth outcomes in rural Malawi. PLoS One. 2018; 13(10): e0206035. Epub 2018 Oct 23

Zoya T, Farnaz J, Asghar Z, Zohre K, Sharifzadeh, GholamReza, et al. Relationships of the First Trimester Maternal BMI with New-born Anthropometric Characteristics and Visfatin Levels throughout Pregnancy. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2017;6(8):17-23.

Xiao L, Ding G, Vinturache A, Xu J, Ding Y, Guo J, et al. Associations of maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with birth outcomes in Shanghai, China. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2017; 7. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41073>. Epub 2017 Jan 25

Terán JM, Varea C, Bernis C, Bogin B, González-González A. New birthweight charts according to parity and type of delivery for the Spanish population. Gaceta Sanitaria. 2017;31(2):116-22.

Hafner E, Schuchter K, Metzenbauer M, Philipp K. Uterine artery Doppler perfusion in the first and second pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2000;16(7):625-9.

National Statistical Office. The number of live birth in Thailand [cited 2019 Apr 15]. <http://social.nesdb.go.th/SocialStat/StatReport_Final.aspx?reportid=214&template=1R3C&yeartype=O&subcatid=15.>

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Thammaros, T., Chalom, K., Hanshaoworakul, W., Thitichai, P., Tantiworrawit, P., & Pongpanich, S. (2019). Prevalence and Associated Factors of Neonatal Microcephaly in Thailand, 2014-2018. Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal, 12(3), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v12i3.262958

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2019): July - September

Section

Original article

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.