Evaluation of the Indonesian Animal Brucellosis Surveillance System in 2016 using the Outild’analyse des systèmes de surveillance (OASIS) Method

Authors

  • Dhony Kartika Nugroho Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand; Directorate of Animal Health, Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Syibli Directorate of Animal Health, Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia
  • Luuk Schoonman Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Dirk Pfeiffer Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health, The Royal Veterinary College, United Kingdom
  • Karoon Chanachai Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand
  • Veerasak Punyapornwithaya Veterinary Public Health Centre for Asia Pacific, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand; Excellent Center of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v12i2.262968

Keywords:

brucellosis, OASIS, surveillance evaluation, Indonesia

Abstract

Surveillance system evaluation is essential for the system improvement. The Indonesia government is conducting the animal brucellosis surveillance to determine herd prevalence and detect infected animals in the herd. This study was conducted to evaluate this brucellosis surveillance system using the Outild’analyse des systèmes de surveillance (OASIS) tool. The questionnaire, developed based on the OASIS tool, was sent to officers in charge of the surveillance system at national, regional and local levels. After collection of information, a consensus panel meeting was conducted to validate and summarize the responses. The OASIS tool assessed the level of satisfaction, critical points and attributes of the surveillance system. There were 37 respondents, including 27 provincial, eight regional and two national officers. The respondents were most satisfied with the information dissemination component of the system. They were also satisfied with the utility of the system, laboratory capacity, surveillance tool, data analysis and communication. In contrast, attention was needed for field institutional organization, surveillance procedures and evaluation, sampling points, and representativeness. Corrective actions can be taken and prioritized based on the evaluation findings, focusing at specific elements which did not meet the officers’ expectation.

References

World Organisation for Animal Health. Terrestrial animal health code. 24th ed. Paris; World Organisation for Animal Health; 2015.

Salman MD, Stark KDC, Zepeda C. Quality assurance applied to animal disease surveillance system. Rev Sci Tech. 2003 Aug;22(2):689-96.

Drewe JA, Hoinville LJ, Cook AJ, Floyd T, Gunn G, Stärk KD. SERVAL: a new framework for the evaluation of animal health surveillance. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015 Feb;62(1):33-45. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

Hesterberg U, Cook A, Stack JM. Evaluation of the sensitivity of the British brucellosis surveillance system using stochastic scenario tree modeling. Proceedings of the 12th Meeting of the International Society of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics; 2009 August 10-14; Durban, South Africa; 2009.

Faverjon J. Adaptation of the OASIS method to the assessment of the epidemiological surveillance networks in Southeast Asia. Example of the H5N1 surveillance network in Lao PDR [thesis]. Faculty of Medicine of Créteil. French; 2012. French.

Hendrikx P. The OASIS evaluation tool. 2012 [cited 2015 Jul 3]. <https://www.plateforme-esa.fr/outils-et-methodes-methodes-oasis>.

Hendrikx P, Gay E, Chazel M, Moutou F, Danan C, Richomme C, Boue F. OASIS: An assessment tool of epidemiological surveillance systems in animal health and food safety. Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Oct;139(10):1486-96. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Amat JP, Hendrikx P, Tapprest J, Leblond A, Dufour B. Comparative evaluation of three surveillance systems for infectious equine diseases in France and implications for future synergies. Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Oct;143(14):3122-33. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

Indonesia. Ministry of Agriculture. Guideline on brucellosis control and eradicate in Indonesia. Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture; 2015. Indonesian.

Australia Indonesia Partnership for Emerging Infectious Diseases. Review of Indonesia’s animal health information needs and capabilities. Jakarta: AIP-EID; 2012.

German RR, Lee LM, Horan JM, Milstein RL, Pertowski CA, Waller MN; Guidelines Working Group Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Jul 27;50(RR-13):1-35; quiz CE1-7.

United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Protocol for national surveillance unit: evaluation of animal health surveillance systems. United States of America: Department of Agriculture; 2005.

Indonesia. Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health Services. Animal health and production strategic plan 2010-2014. Jakarta: Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health Services; 2010. Indonesian.

Jane R, Heim D, Wilson D, Abila R. An evaluation of the veterinary services of Indonesia: a report of the findings of the OIE evaluation team. World Organisation for Animal Health; 2007.

Published

2019-07-02

How to Cite

Nugroho, D. K., Syibli, M., Schoonman, L., Pfeiffer, D., Chanachai, K., & Punyapornwithaya, V. (2019). Evaluation of the Indonesian Animal Brucellosis Surveillance System in 2016 using the Outild’analyse des systèmes de surveillance (OASIS) Method. Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal, 12(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v12i2.262968

Issue

Section

Original article