Malaria Surveillance at Thai-Myanmar Border, Mae Sot District, Tak Province, Thailand, July 2013

Authors

  • Than Naing Soe National Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Myanmar
  • Seesai Yeesoonsang Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thaila
  • Chuleeporn Jirapongsa Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Ha Ai Phan Nguyen Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, Vietnam
  • Suwit Thammapalo Office of Disease Prevention and Control 12, Songkhla Province, Thailand
  • Shen Tao Chinese Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Education and Training, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, China
  • Manita Phanawadee Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Vanlaya Srethapranai Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Sithu Ye Naung Regional Malaria Control (Mon and Kayin States), Ministry of Health, Myanmar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v9i3.263212

Keywords:

malaria, surveillance, cross-border

Abstract

Malaria epidemic along Thai-Myanmar border is still an ongoing occurrence. We explored malaria surveillance systems in Mae Sot District in order to improve the detection and response efforts in the region. The main objective was to study effectiveness of the malaria surveillance systems at Thai-Myanmar border. Data were collected by reviewing medical records, interviewing personnel at operation levels and observing the surveillance sites. The reporting system under Bureau of Epidemiology (BOE) was hospital-based, with 76% coverage, 100% positive predictive value and 100% timeliness. It was acceptable and stable, yet less flexible. The reporting system of Bureau of Vector Borne Disease (BVBD), existed from the village level, was used to obtain information for malaria prevention and control. The reports were sent via online malaria database system. Its sustainability could be affected by withdrawal of the Global Fund. Information of both systems was closely linked at the hospital (district) level. At border areas, health personnel regularly shared information through buddy health volunteers from both countries. Collaboration between epidemiology and information technology units should be strengthened in BOE and the reporting forms should be simplified by BVBD. The central Thai government should consider how to sustain the malaria surveillance and response system in the long run.

References

Chareonviriyaphap T, Bangs MJ, Ratanatham S. Status of malaria in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000 Jun;31(2):225-37.

Thailand. Office of International Cooperation. Department of Disease Control. Ministry of Public Health. Thailand country report [cited 2016 Jan 9]. <http://oic.ddc.moph.go.th/file/bimst.htm>

World Health Organization. Disease surveillance in malaria control: an operational manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.

Global Health Sciences. Surveillance systems to facilitate malaria elimination. 2014 Jan [cited 2016 Jan 9]. <http://globalhealthsciences.ucsf.edu/sites/default/files/content/ghg/mei-surveillance-systems-to-facilitate.pdf>

World Health Organization. Report of the programmatic review of the national malaria control programme in Thailand. Bangkok: World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2012.

ASEAN Plus Three Field Epidemiology Training Network. ASEAN+3 FETN: Strategies and workplan (2012-2015). Bangkok: Bureau of Epidemiology; 2012. p.10.

German RR, Lee LM, Horan JM, Milstein RL, Pertowski CA, Waller MN. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Jul 27;50(RR-13):1-35.

Thailand. Bureau of Epidemiology. Department of Disease Control. Ministry of Public Health. Guideline for the SRRT operations, Thailand. Bangkok: Ministry of Public Health; 2012.

Olugbade OT, Ladipo TO, Isreal O, Adedire EO, Adedokun B, Ajumobi O, et al. Malaria surveillance system evaluation, Oyo state, Nigeria 2012. Int J Infect Dis. 2014 Apr; 21(1):275-6.

Barat LM, Barnett BJ, Smolinski MS, Espey DK, Levy CE, Zucker JR. Evaluation of malaria surveillance using retrospective, laboratory-based active case detection in four southwestern states, 1995. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Jun;60(6):910-4.

Akbari H, Majdzadeh R, Rahimi Foroushani A, Raeisi A. Timeliness of malaria surveillance system in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(1):39-47. Epub 2013 Jan 1.

Thailand. Bureau of Epidemiology. Department of Disease Control. Ministry of Public Health.Diseases Surveillance (Report 506) Thailand. 2015 [cited 2016 Mar 9]. <http://www.boe.moph.go.th/boedb/d506_1/ds_wk2pdf_en.php?ds=30&yr=59>

Pattanasin S, Satitvipawee P, Wongklang W, Viwatwongkasem C, Bhumiratana A, Soontornpipit P, et al. Risk factors for malaria infection among rubber tappers living in a malaria control program area in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012 Nov;43(6):1313-25.

Thailand Malaria Elimination Program. Surveillance data on malaria. 2015 [cited 2015 Jul 25]. <http://203.151.149.115/malariar10.index_newversion.php>

United Nations Office for Project Services. Fact sheet [cited 2015 Jul 24]. <http://pr.org.mm/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Fact-sheet-2011.pdf>

World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 1st ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

Published

2016-09-29

How to Cite

Soe, T. N., Yeesoonsang, S., Jirapongsa, C., Nguyen, H. A. P., Thammapalo, S., Tao, S., Phanawadee, M., Srethapranai, V., & Naung, S. Y. (2016). Malaria Surveillance at Thai-Myanmar Border, Mae Sot District, Tak Province, Thailand, July 2013. Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal, 9(3), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v9i3.263212

Issue

Section

Original article