Evaluation of Three Main Tuberculosis Case Reporting Systems in Satun Province, Thailand, 2011

Authors

  • Sheng Jie Lai Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; Division of Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early Warning on Infectious Disease, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • T Wangteeraprasert Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • T Sermkaew Provincial Health Office, Satun Province, Thailand
  • O Nararak Provincial Health Office, Satun Province, Thailand
  • S Binsard Provincial Health Office, Satun Province, Thailand
  • M Phanawadee Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • I Ieowongjaroen Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • P Doung-ngern Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • X F Tang Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Sichuan Province, China
  • C Sayavong Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; Epidemiology Section, Health Department, Vientiane Capital City, Lao PDR
  • L Panya Bureau of Tuberculosis, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • J Theerapansatian Bureau of Tuberculosis, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • J Laddaglom National Health Security Office, Thailand
  • C Jiraphongsa Field Epidemiology Training Program, Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v7i3.263288

Keywords:

tuberculosis, surveillance, evaluation, Thailand

Abstract

Three main tuberculosis (TB) reporting systems were operating in Thailand: notifiable disease surveillance (R506), TB registration and control in Bureau of Tuberculosis (BTB) and TB report for reimbursement in National Health Security Office (NHSO). A cross-sectional study was conducted in Satun Province in July 2011 to determine whether the three systems responded well to the objectives of TB surveillance. Patients diagnosed with TB and received anti-TB drugs at least once in 2010 from three hospitals were compared with TB cases reported in three systems. In the hospitals, 170 TB cases, including 95 new smear positive pulmonary TB cases, were reviewed. Coverage and positive predictive value were 73% and 83% for R506, 87% and 100% for BTB, and 79% and 99% for NHSO respectively. Success rate (82%) of all cases was lower than that was reported in BTB (96%). Median duration from diagnosis to reporting in R506, BTB and NHSO were six, 61 and two days respectively. All systems had sufficient budget, human resources and regular training. In addition, all systems had good capacity to achieve the major objectives of TB surveillance and their specific objectives. However, the systems had total 295 variables which resulted in high workload for reporting. Integrating three systems as one national TB reporting system was recommended to improve coverage, timeliness and success rate.

References

Heymann DL. Control of communicable diseases manual. 19th ed. Washington DC: APHA Press; 2008. p. 639-58.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A global perspective on tuberculosis. 2011. [cited 2012 Aug 20]. <http://www.cdc.gov/tb/events/WorldTBDay/resources_global.htm>

Styblo K. Epidemiology of tuberculosis. 2nd ed. The Hague: Royal Netherlands Tuberculosis Association; 1991.

World Health Organization. TB impact measurement, policy and recommendations for how to assess the epidemiological burden of TB and the impact of TB control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. p.10-20.

World Health Organization. Tuberculosis prevention, care and control: a practical directory of new advances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. p.1-35.

Rieder HL, Watson JM, Raviglione MC, Forssbohm M, Migliori GB, Schwoebel V, et al. Surveillance of tuberculosis in Europe. Working Group of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Region of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUATLD) for uniform reporting on tuberculosis cases. Eur Respir J. 1996 May;9(5):1097-104.

Washington State Department of Health. Washington State TB services manual: surveillance. 2012 Jun [cited 2012 Aug 11]. <http://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/Pubs/343-071-WATBManual-Surveillance.pdf>

Thailand. Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, World Health Organization. Fourth review of the national tuberculosis programme in Thailand. New Delhi: World Health Organization; 2008.

Principal Recipient Administrative Office. Comprehensive M&E plan for TB control in Thailand. 2009. Thai [cited 2011 Jun 25]. <http://www.thaiprddc.org/more_news.php?cid=2020&filename=index>

World Health Organization. Compendium of indicators for monitoring and evaluating national tuberculosis programs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. p.1-17.

World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision [cited 2011 Jun 25]. <http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en>

World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis control: WHO report 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. p.28-40.

World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis control: WHO report 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. p.11-5.

Gregg MB. Field epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p.18-20.

World Health Organization. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. p.4-5.

World Health Organization. A guide to monitoring and evaluation for collaborative TB/HIV activities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. p.14-40.

German RR, Lee LM, Horan JM, Milstein RL, Pertowski CA, Waller MN. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the guidelines working group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Jul;50(RR-13):1-35.

Falzon D, Ait-Belghiti F. What is tuberculosis surveillance in the European Union telling us? Clin Infect Dis. 2007 May;44(10):1261-7.

Pillaye J, Clarke A. An evaluation of completeness of tuberculosis notification in the United Kingdom. BMC Public Health. 2003 Oct;3:31.

Dembele SM, Ouedraogo HZ, Combary A, Saleri N, Macq J, Dujardin B. Conversion rate at two-month follow-up of smear-positive tuberculosis patients in Burkina Faso. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Dec;11(12):1339-44.

Published

2014-09-29

How to Cite

Lai, S. J., Wangteeraprasert, T., Sermkaew, T., Nararak, O., Binsard, S., Phanawadee, M., Ieowongjaroen, I., Doung-ngern, P., Tang, X. F., Sayavong, C., Panya, L., Theerapansatian, J., Laddaglom, J., & Jiraphongsa, C. (2014). Evaluation of Three Main Tuberculosis Case Reporting Systems in Satun Province, Thailand, 2011. Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal, 7(3), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v7i3.263288

Issue

Section

Original article