Performance of the Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) Surveillance System: A Case Study of Chey Chumneas Hospital, Kandal Province, Cambodia, 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v18i3.273671Keywords:
Cambodia, evaluation, SARI surveillance, attributeAbstract
Cambodia’s Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) surveillance system was established in 2012. The system monitors SARI cases, detects outbreaks, and identifies influenza trends. However, the system has not undergone evaluation since its inception. This evaluation aimed to assess surveillance attributes at Chey Chumneas Hospital, Kandal Province. A mixed-methods approach was utilized, following US-CDC guidelines. Medical records in 2022 were reviewed to assess sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Case reporting forms were reviewed to determine completeness. The timeliness of weekly reports in the system and the release of laboratory results were evaluated. Semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders were used to assess qualitative attributes. Between 2018 and 2022, 576 SARI cases were reported. The sensitivity in detecting true SARI cases among admitted patients was 33%, and the PPV was 73%. In 2022, 54% (28/52 weeks) of weekly reports were submitted on time, and 59% (52/88) of SARI cases had laboratory results released within 24 hours. Of 88 case reporting forms, 91% of socio-demographic and date of onset variables were complete, and three SARI symptom variables had a completion of 95%. The system was positive in terms of usefulness, simplicity, acceptability, and flexibility, but stability was relatively weak due to dependence on external funding. The system was useful in estimating morbidity and mortality and monitoring influenza trends. Although its performance was good, gaps in sensitivity, timeliness, and stability remained. Targeted training, supervision for the hospital SARI focal point, and sustained financial support are needed to improve the surveillance system’s performance.
References
Public Health Infrastructure Center, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health 101 series: introduction to public health surveillance [Internet]. Atlanta: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [cited 2024 Sep 26]. <https://www.cdc.gov/training-publichealth101/php/training/introduction-to-public-health-surveillance.html>
Marbus SD, van der Hoek W, van Dissel JT, van Gageldonk-Lafeber AB. Experience of establishing severe acute respiratory surveillance in the Netherlands: evaluation and challenges. Public Health Pract. 2020 Nov;1:100014. doi:10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100014.
Declich S, Carter AO. Public health surveillance: historical origins, methods and evaluation. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(2):285–304.
World Health Organization. Global influenza surveillance and response system (GISRS) [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization [cited 2024 Sep 26]. <https://www.who.int/initiatives/global-influenza-surveillance-and-response-system>
Saunders-Hastings PR, Krewski D. Reviewing the history of pandemic influenza: understanding patterns of emergence and transmission. Pathogend. 2016 Dec 6;5(4):66. doi:10.3390/pathogens5040066.
Nicoll A, Ammon A, Amato Gauci A, Ciancio B, Zucs P, Devaux I, et al. Experience and lessons from surveillance and studies of the 2009 pandemic in Europe. Public Health. 2010 Jan;124(1):14–23. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.001.
Communicable Disease Control Department. Severe Acute Respiratory Illness Surveillance, Cambodia [Internet]. Phnom Penh: Ministry of Health; [cited 2024 Sep 26]. <http://www.cdcmoh.gov.kh/17-surveillance/sari-surveillance>
Kandal province [Internet]. San Francisco: Wikipedia; [updated 2024 Aug 27; cited 2024 Sep 25]. <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kandal_province&oldid=1242569162>
German RR, Lee LM, Horan JM, Milstein RL, Pertowski CA, Waller MN; Guidelines Working Group Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep [Internet]. 2001 Jul 27 [cited 2024 Sep 26];50(RR-13):1–35. <https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5013a1.htm>
World Health Organization. WHO surveillance case definitions for ILI and SARI [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; [cited 2024 Sep 26]. <https://www.who.int/teams/global-influenza-programme/surveillance-and-monitoring/case-definitions-for-ili-and-sari>
Alkholidy GG, Anam LS, Almahaqri AH, Khader Y. Performance of the severe acute respiratory illness sentinel surveillance system in Yemen: mixed methods evaluation study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jul 9;7(7):e27621. doi:10.2196/27621.
Marron L, Duffy R, O’Donnell J, Domegan L. An evaluation of the severe acute respiratory infection surveillance system in Ireland. BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb;25:492. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-21645-3.
So B, Has P, Bunchhoeung T, Tek S. Evaluation of severe acute respiratory illness surveillance system in Kirivong Referral Hospital Site, Cambodia, 2016 [Internet]. Decatur (GA): Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network; [cited 2024 Sep 25]. <https://www.tephinet.org/learning/fead/evaluation-severe-acute-respiratory-illness-surveillance-system-kirivong-referral>
Simusika P, Tempia S, Chentulo E, Polansky L, Mazaba ML, Ndumba I, Mbewe QK, Monze M. An evaluation of the Zambia influenza sentinel surveillance system, 2011-2017. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):35. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4884-5.
Alkholidy GG, Anam LS, Almahaqri AH, Khader Y. Performance of the Severe Acute Respiratory Illness Sentinel Surveillance System in Yemen: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jul 9;7(7):e27621. doi:10.2196/27621.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




