High Sensitivity with Suboptimal Predictive Value and Delayed Reporting: Identifying Gaps in Congenital Zika Syndrome Surveillance at Saraburi Hospital, Thailand, 2022–2023

Authors

  • Nouannipha Simmalavong Department of Communicable Diseases Control, Ministry of Health, Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Soutthongkham Sitthideth Center of Malariology Parasitology and Entomology, Ministry of Health, Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Wanchat Saowong Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Supanut Chotichavalrattanakul Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Chanakan Duanyai Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Ingkarat Somarungson Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Panupong Tantirat Saraburi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Sutham Jirapanakorn Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; Strategy and Planning Division, Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Thanaphon Yisankhun Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Thanit Rattanathamsakul Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Rapeepong Suphanchaimat Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand; International Health Policy Foundation, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v18i3.274797

Keywords:

Zika, surveillance evaluation, sensitivity, positive predictive value

Abstract

Zika virus is an arboviral infection primarily transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, with severe complications in children, notably congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). This study evaluates the surveillance system of CZS based on the R506 reporting system, the nationwide reporting platform of the Department of Disease Control, at Saraburi Hospital, Thailand, during 2022–2023. We employed both quantitative and qualitative methods. A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted through a review of hospital records and R506 surveillance data. Attributes such as sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. For the qualitative study, attributes such as acceptability, simplicity, flexibility, and stability were assessed mainly through semi-structured interviews, and a framework analysis was conducted. The surveillance system demonstrated a sensitivity of 100.0% and a PPV of 44.4%. Completeness was high for demographic variables; however, timeliness was suboptimal, with 11.1% of reports submitted within a one-week window. The system was deemed useful and stable; however, challenges in interoperability between R506 and the hospital database were noted. Notably, the in-house hospital laboratory lacked the capacity to perform Zika polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, necessitating external processing and likely contributing to reporting delays. While the surveillance system could detect cases effectively, improvements in timeliness, coding consistency, and data integration are needed. Revising the case definition could increase the PPV. Enhancing the hospital's laboratory capacity, particularly for PCR testing, may reduce reporting time. Strengthening reporting practices and stakeholder collaboration could further improve system efficiency.

References

World Health Organization. Zika situation report – 10 March 2017 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 Mar 10 [cited 2025 Apr 1]. <https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/zika-situation-report>

Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Zika virus: an overview. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016 Jul–Sep;5(3):523–7. doi:10.4103/2249-4863.

Boeuf P, Drummer HE, Richards JS, Scoullar MJL, Beeson JG. The global threat of Zika virus to pregnancy: epidemiology, clinical perspectives, mechanisms, and impact. BMC Med. 2016 Aug 3;14(1):112. doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0660-0.

Rabe IB, Hills SL, Haussig JM, Walker AT, Dos Santos T, San Martin JL, et al. A Review of the Recent Epidemiology of Zika Virus Infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2025;112(5): 1026-35. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.24-0420.

Freitas DA, Souza-Santos R, Carvalho LMA, Barros WB, Neves LM, Brasil P, et al. Congenital Zika syndrome: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 15;15(12):e0242367. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242367.

van der Linden V, Pessoa A, Dobyns W, Barkovich AJ, van der Linden H Jr, Rolim Filho EL, et al. Description of 13 infants born during October 2015–January 2016 with congenital Zika virus infection without microcephaly at birth—Brazil. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(47):1343–8.

Arya R, Antonisamy B, Kumar S. Sample size estimation in prevalence studies. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79(11):1482–.doi:10.1007/s12098-012-0763-3.

Phookduang P, Waruttamapongphan W. Assessment of surveillance system under the patient investigation (PUI) Zika virus infection in Rayong Hospital. Res Dev Health Syst J. 2020;13(1):173–80.

Division of Epidemiology. Guideline for reporting of dangerous communicable diseases and communicable diseases under surveillance according to the Communicable Disease Act BE 2558. Nonthaburi: Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health (TH); 2020.

Bautista LE, Herrera VM. An assessment of public health surveillance of Zika virus infection and potentially associated outcomes in Latin America. BMC Public Health. 2018 May 24;18(1):656. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5566-7.

Wongsanuphat S, Malaikham J, Suriya S, Prommongkhol J, Khampha N, Khempetch T. Enhancing digital disease surveillance in Thailand using information technology, data engineering, data science, and artificial intelligence. OSIR. 2025 Mar;18(1):52–60. doi:10.59096/osir.v18i1.272056.

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Simmalavong, N. ., Sitthideth, S., Saowong, W., Chotichavalrattanakul, S., Duanyai, C., Somarungson, I., Tantirat, P., Jirapanakorn, S., Yisankhun, T., Rattanathamsakul, T., & Suphanchaimat, R. (2025). High Sensitivity with Suboptimal Predictive Value and Delayed Reporting: Identifying Gaps in Congenital Zika Syndrome Surveillance at Saraburi Hospital, Thailand, 2022–2023 . Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal, 18(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v18i3.274797

Issue

Section

Original article