The Grammar of Science: B&I Before AI—Bias and Inference Still Matter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59096/osir.v19i2.282987Abstract
-
References
World Health Organization. WHO issues first global report on artificial intelligence (AI) in health and six guiding principles for its design and use [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 Jun 28 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.who.int/news/item/28-06-2021-who-issues-first-global-report-on-ai-in-health-and-six-guiding-principles-for-its-design-and-use>
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Bioethics briefing note: artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and research [Internet]. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2018 May [cited 2026 May 1]. 8 p. <https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Artificial-Intelligence-AI-in-healthcare-and-research-1.pdf>
Krubiner C, Studman A, Singh S. How is AI reshaping health research? [Internet]. London: Wellcome; 2023 Nov 1 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://wellcome.org/insights/articles/how-ai-reshaping-health-research>
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. What is artificial intelligence? [Internet]. Washington: NASA; 2024 May 13 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.nasa.gov/what-is-artificial-intelligence/>
Panteli D, Adib K, Buttigieg S, Goiana-da-Silva F, Ladewig K, Azzopardi-Muscat N, et al. Artificial intelligence in public health: promises, challenges, and an agenda for policy makers and public health institutions. Lancet Public Health. 2025 May;10(5):e428–32. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00036-2.
Chumakov E. History and definitions of AI. Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 26;68(Suppl 1):S61. doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.238.
Foote KD. A brief history of generative AI [Internet]. Studio City (CA): Dataversity; 2025 Sep 10 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.dataversity.net/articles/a-brief-history-of-generative-ai>
Ordak M. Artificial intelligence-assisted statistical analysis and statistical review: evidence (2023-2025) and implications for internal medicine. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2026 Mar 24;136(3):17243. doi:10.20452/pamw.17243.
Takyer A. Causal AI: importance, use cases, benefits, challenges and implementation strategies [Internet]. Gurugram: LeewayHertz; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.leewayhertz.com/causal-ai/>
Jiao L, Wang Y, Liu X, Li L, Liu F, Ma W, et al. Causal inference meets deep learning: a comprehensive survey. Research (Wash D C). 2024;7:0467. doi:10.34133/research.0467.
Karimov A. History of artificial intelligence [Internet]. Zurich: Swiss Cyber Institute; 2026 Jan 21 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://swisscyberinstitute.com/blog/history-artificial-intelligence/>
Fahim YA, Hasani IW, Kabba S, Ragab WM. Artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine: clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Sep 23;30(1):848. doi:10.1186/s40001-025-03196-w.
Deonandan R. Role of artificial intelligence in health research: opportunities, challenges, and implications for medical education. Cureus. 2026;18(4):e106579. doi:10.7759/cureus.106579.
Dinga R, Schmaal L, Penninx B, Veltman DJ, Marquand AF. Controlling for effects of confounding variables on machine learning predictions. bioRxiv [preprint]. 2020 Aug 18 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.255034>
Hasanzadeh F, Josephson CB, Waters G, Adedinsewo D, Azizi Z, White JA. Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 11;8(1):154. doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01503-7.
American University of Beirut. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: AI in health research [Internet]. Beirut: American University of Beirut; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://aub.edu.lb.libguides.com/c.php?g=1486495&p=11088096>
Lane Medical Library, Stanford Medicine. AI tools and resources for biomedical research [Internet]. Stanford (CA): Stanford Medicine; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://laneguides.stanford.edu/AI/tools>
Williams B. Use of AI in Health Data Analysis for Research [Internet]. Gainesville: Insight7; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://insight7.io/artificial-intelligence-in-data-analysis-for-research/>
Smith J, Noble H. Understanding sources of bias in research. Evid Based Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;28(3):137–9. doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2024-104231.
HealthKnowledge, Faculty of Public Health. Biases and confounding [Inernet]. London: Faculty of Public Health; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/research-methods/1a-epidemiology/biases>
Steingart KR. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy [Internet]. Montreal: TeachEpi; [cited 2026 May 1]. 85 p. <https://www.teachepi.org/wp-content/uploads/OldTE/documents/courses/tbdiagrx2/day4/Steingart%20SRs%20of%20DTA_Montreal_FINAL_r1.pdf>
Walker AR, Venetis CA, Opdahl S, Chambers GM, Jorm LR, Vajdic CM. Estimating the impact of bias in causal epidemiological studies: the case of health outcomes following assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):869–75. doi:10.1093/humrep/deae053.
Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 4;9:211–7. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S104807.
Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1–2):51–63. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2.
Watkins TR. Understanding uncertainty and bias to improve causal inference in health intervention research [dissertation]. Sydney: School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney; 2019 Jul [cited 2026 May 1]. 373 p. <https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/20772>
Greenland S, Morgenstern H. Confounding in health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:189–212. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.189.
Benasseur I, Talbot D, Durand M, Holbrook A, Matteau A, Potter BJ, et al. A comparison of confounder selection and adjustment methods for estimating causal effects using large healthcare databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Apr;31(4):424–33. doi:10.1002/pds.5403.
Komeyer V, Eickhoff SB, Grefkes C, Patil KR, Raimondo F. A framework for confounder considerations in AI-driven precision medicine. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.02.2430219>
Ott MA. Bias in, bias out: ethical considerations for the application of machine learning in pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2022 Aug;247:124. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.01.035.
Harvard Graduate School of Education. Unit 4 - causal and non-causal associations [Internet]. Cambridge (MA); Harvard Graduate School of Education; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://s040.gse.harvard.edu/unit4.html>
HealthKnowledge, Faculty of Public Health. Association and causation [Internet]. London: Faculty of Public Health; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/research-methods/1a-epidemiology/association-causation>
Karamitros G, Grant MP, Lamaris GA. Associations in medical research can be misleading: a clinician's guide to causal inference. J Surg Res. 2025 Jun;310:145–54. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.043.
Raden N. How causal analysis and AI intersect- methods of causal inference [Internet]. Wallington: Diginomica; 2023 Oct 24 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://diginomica.com/how-causal-analysis-and-ai-intersect-methods-causal-inference>
Osborne V, Shakir SAW. What is the difference between observed association and causal association, signals and evidence? examples related to COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 2021;11:569189. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.569189.
Glass TA, Goodman SN, Hernan MA, Samet JM. Causal inference in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:61–75. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124606.
Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? 1965. J R Soc Med. 2015 Jan;108(1):32–7. doi:10.1177/0141076814562718.
Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S144–50. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204.
Shimonovich M, Pearce A, Thomson H, Keyes K, Katikireddi SV. Assessing causality in epidemiology: revisiting Bradford Hill to incorporate developments in causal thinking. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;36(9):873–87. doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00703-7.
Matthay EC, Neill DB, Titus AR, Desai S, Troxel A, Cerda M, et al. Integrating artificial intelligence into causal research in epidemiology. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(6). doi:10.1007/s40471-025-00359-5.
Chauhan VK, Dhami DS, Gao B, Wang X, Clifton L, Clifton DA. Beyond correlations: the necessity and the challenges of causal AI. TechRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Aug 18 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.175554759.96327720/v1>
Pearl J, Mackenzie D. The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. New York: Basic books; 2018.
Uppili S. Causal AI in 2026: use cases, tools & how it works [Internet]. Austin (TX): Kanerika Inc; 2025 Oct 14 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://kanerika.com/blogs/causal-ai/>
Lee H, Qiu S, Haupert S, Innes GK, Naumann T, Alemayehu D, van der Laan M. Methodological and regulatory considerations for causal AI in drug development. NPJ Digit Med. 2026 Feb 27;9(1):295. doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02477-w.
Lee AG. Causal AI: current state-of-the-art & future directions [Internet]. San Francisco; Medium; 2025 Mar 7 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://medium.com/@alexglee/causal-ai-current-state-of-the-art-future-directions-c17ad57ff879>
Jacovi A, Goldberg Y. Towards faithfully interpretable NLP systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness? [Internet]. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 2020 Jul 5–10. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Liguistics; 2020. 8 p.
Fadeeva E, Rubashevskii A, Piatrashyn D, Vashurin R, Dhuliawala S, Shelmanov A, et al. Faithfulness-aware uncertainty quantification for fact-checking the output of retrieval augmented generation. arXiv:2505.21072 [Preprint]. 2025 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.21072>
Meleka M. Retrieval-augmented AI assistants for healthcare: system design and evaluation [dissertation]. Oxford: Kellogg College, University of Oxford; [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9add0c17-f4fe-4051-9a2a-027f8818a5aa/files/d3197xm748>
Gargari OK, Habibi G. Enhancing medical AI with retrieval-augmented generation: A mini narrative review. Digit Health. 2025 Apr 21;11:20552076251337177. doi:10.1177/20552076251337177.
Zhao X, Liu S, Yang SY, Miao C. MedRAG: enhancing retrieval-augmented generation with knowledge graph-elicited reasoning for healthcare copilot. arXiv:2502.04413 [Preprint]. 2025 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.04413>
Low YS, Jackson ML, Hyde RJ, Brown RE, Sanghavi NM, Baldwin JD, et al. Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model, retrieval-augmented generation, and agentic systems. Digit Health. 2025 Jun 9;11:20552076251348850. doi:10.1177/20552076251348850.
Stane D. Powering causal inference analysis with machine learning [Internet]. San Diego: Teradata; 2025 Nov 28 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.teradata.com/insights/ai-and-machine-learning/powering-causal-inference-analysis>
Parikh H, Varjao C, Xu L, Tchetgen E. Validating causal inference models [Internet]. Seattle (WA): Amazon Science; 2022 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.amazon.science/publications/validating-causal-inference-models#>
Boge F, Mosig A. Causality and scientific explanation of artificial intelligence systems in biomedicine. Pflugers Arch. 2025 Apr;477(4):543–54. doi:10.1007/s00424-024-03033-9.
Reid A. Causal discovery: an introduction [Internet]. Tilburg (NL): Andrew Reid; 2024 Sep 23 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://www.reid-lab.org/blog>
Cole SR, Frangakis CE. The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption? Epidemiology. 2009 Jan;20(1):3–5. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818ef366.
Im DJ, Cho K. Active and passive causal inference learning. arXiv:2308.09248 [Preprint]. 2024 Aug 25 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.09248>
Jeon N, Brand JE. Causal machine learning: a deductive–inductive framework for sociological research. Köln Z Soziol. 2026. doi:10.1007/s11577-026-01053-0.
Yunguo Yu. A causal explanation framework for clinical AI: methods and technical evaluation. hal-05484638 [Preprint]. 2026 Jan 30 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://hal.science/hal-05484638>
Kartik NVJK. Evaluating causality in AI models in 2026: how to build AI that reasons beyond correlation [Internet]. San Francisco: Future AGI; 2025 Jan 30 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://futureagi.com/blog/evaluating-causality-in-ai-models/>
OpenAI. ChatGPT (GPT-5.5 Thinking) [Internet]. San Francisco: OpenAI; 2026 [cited 2026 May 1]. <https://chat.openai.com/>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
