Main Article Content
This descriptive study aimed to translate the 6 Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT) that was originally developed by Brooke and Bullock in 1999 from English to Thai and to preliminarily examine its validity and reliability. This study included two phases. Phase 1 consisted of translating the 6CIT into Thai using the back translation method and assessing content validity by a panel of experts in gerontology and cognitive
impairment in older people. Phase 2 comprised concurrent validity testing and stability reliability testing. Participants in this study were older people who participated in two senior citizens clubs, Bangkok. A hundred older people who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study. Participants were interviewed using the demographic questionnaire, the Mini-Cog-Thai version, and the 6CIT-Thai version. Fifty participants out of a hundred who had the same inclusion criteria were asked to complete the 6CIT-Thai version again in the next two weeks. Data were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. The results indicated that the content validity index for item and scale level index reflected its validity. The 6CIT-Thai version showed acceptable concurrent validity. There was a statistically significant moderate negative correlation between the score of the 6CIT-Thai version and the Mini-Cog-Thai version.
Also, the stability reliability was validated through the test-retest reliability coefficient and it showed a significant strong positive correlation between a score of the 6CIT-Thai version at the first round and the second round, two weeks apart. In summary, the 6CITThai version has shown to be valid and reliable to use for initial screening for dementia in older adults living in a community and for conducting research.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในรามาธิบดีพยาบาลสาร ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสาร หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่หรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ใด จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากรามาธิบดีพยาบาลสารก่อนเท่านั้น
disorder: DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. p.591-643.
2. Petersen RC, Negash S. Mild cognitive impairment: an overview. CNS Spectr. 2008;13(1):45-53.
3. Lopez OL. Mild cognitive impairment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013;19(2):411–24.
4. Kaiyawan S, Aroonsang P. Functional ability, cognitive function, and depression in older persons with chronic
illness attended at a chronic care clinic, community hospital. Journal of Nursing Science and Health. 2016;
39(1):78-88. (in Thai)
5. Institute of Geriatric Medicine. Mini-mental state examination-Thai 2002. Department of Medical Services,
Ministry of Public Health; 2002. (in Thai)
6. Train the brain forum committee. Thai Mental State Examination (TMES). Siriraj Hospital Gaz. 1993;
45(6):359-74. (in Thai)
7. Hemrungrojn S. Montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA) Thai version 2007; 2011 [cited 2019 July 1] Available
from website: http://www.mocatest.org/pdf_files/test/MoCA-Test-Thai.pdf
8. Nawamongkolwatana B, Kittirattanapaiboon P, Kenbubpha K. The survey of cognitive impairment in elderly Thai people: National survey 2008. Journal of Mental Health of Thailand. 2010;18(1):1-13. (in Thai)
9. Suksatit B, Thiengburanathum P. Mild cognitive impairment among patients with ischemic stroke:
prevalence, characteristics, and its related factors. Nursing Journal. 2017;44(1):149-60. (in Thai)
10. Janthayanont D, Maprajong A, Wongchawatcharakul P,Jirajan C, Pratakpiriya N, Sirapalanon K, et al. Prevalence,quality of life, and patient compliance of cognitive impairment in diabetes patients in Health promoting hospital in Tambon Lumplee, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya District Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province. Journal of Preventive Medicine Association of Thailand. 2011;1:15-23. (in Thai)
11. Cullen B, O’Neill B, Evans JJ, Coen RF, Lawlor BA. A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:790-9.
12. Ismail Z, Rajji TK, Shulman KL. Brief cognitive screening instruments: an update. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;
13. Muangpaisan W. Assessment and diagnosis of people with cognitive impairment and dementia in clinical practice.In Weerasak M, Editor. Gerontology and geriatrics for primary care practice. Bangkok: parbpim; 2017. p.159-78. (in Thai)
14. Coen RF, Robertson DA, Kenny RA, King-Kallimanis BL. Strengths and limitations of the MoCA for assessing
cognitive functioning: findings from a large representative sample of Irish older adults. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol.2016;29(1):18-24.
15. Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A.The mini-cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for
dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(11):1021-7.
16. Borson S, Scanlan JM, Chen P, Ganguli M. The Mini-Cog as a screen for dementia: validation in a population-based sample. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(10):1451-4.
17. Trongsakul S, Lambert R, Clark A, Wongpakaran N, CrossJ. Development of the Thai version of Mini-Cog, a brief cognitive screening test. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(5):594-600.
18. Brooke P, Bullock R. Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage. Int J
Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14(11):936-40.
19. Abdel-Aziz K, Larner AJ. Six-item cognitive impairment test (6CIT): pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study
for dementia and MCI. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(6):991-7.
20. Hessler JB, Schäufele M, Hendlmeier I, Nora Junge M,Leonhardt S, Weber J, et al. The 6-item cognitive impairment test as a bedside screening for dementia in general hospital patients: results of the General Hospital
Study (GHoSt). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(7):726-33.
21. O’Sullivan D, O’Regan NA, Timmons S. Validity and reliability of the 6-item cognitive impairment test for
screening cognitive impairment: a review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2016;42(1-2):42-9.
22. Larner AJ. Six-item cognitive impairment test: suitable for the visually impaired? Prog Neurol Psychiatry. 2015;19(6):20-2.
23. Volpato S, Guralnik JM. The different domains of the comprehensive geriatric assessment. 2018 [cited June 29,
2018] Available from: https://webcache.googleuser content.com/search?q=cache:H2R0Oxu6C2sJ:https://
24. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and
recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67.
25. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social,behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods.2007;39(2):175-91.
26. Aberson CL. Applied power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2010.
27. Hopkins W. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1–15.
28. Harkness JA. Questionnaire translation in Vijver FJR,Mohler PP, editors. Cross-cultural survey methods. New
York: John Wiley& Sons; 2003.
29. Brislin RW. Back translation for cross-cultural research.J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185-216.
30. Maneesriwongkul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a method review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(2):
31. Youngcharoen P, Vincent C. Committee translation approach combined with cognitive interviews: a valuable
translation method [Editorial]. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res Thail. 2016;20(2):91-4.
32. Behling O, Law KS. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.
33. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-85.
34. Squires A, Aiken LH, van den Heede K, Sermeus W,Bruyneel L, Lindqvist R, et al. A systematic survey
instrument translation process for multi-country,comparative health workforce studies. Int J Nurs Stud.
35. Upadhyaya AK, Rajagopal M, Gale TM. The six item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT) as a screening test for
dementia: comparison with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Curr Aging Sci. 2010;3(2):138-42.
36. Tuijl JP, Scholte EM, de Craen AJ, van der Mast RC.Screening for cognitive impairment in older general
hospital patients: comparison of the six-item cognitive impairment test with the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27(7):755-62.
37. Rees G, Xie J, Holloway EE, Sturrock BA, Fenwick EK,Keeffe JE, et al. Identifying distinct risk factors for visionspecific distress and depressive symptoms in people with vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(12):7431-8.
38. Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement reliability. In Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER, editors.
Measurement in nursing and health research. New York:Springer Publishing Company; 2010. p.145-62.
39. Myerson J, Emery L, White DA, Hale S. Effects of age,domain, and processing demands on memory span:
evidence for differential decline. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2003;10(1):20-7.
40. Patel BB, Holland NW. Mild cognitive impairment: hope for stability, plan for progression. Cleve Clin J Med. 2012;79(12):857-64.