Perioperative Care for Patients Undergoing Right Mini-Thoracotomy Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case-Based Approach

Main Article Content

Suchart Chaiyaroj
Pimnada Pichaiphanupatt

Abstract

    Right mini-thoracotomy sutureless aortic valve replacement (RMT-SLAVR) is a novel cardiac surgical technique that combines the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and sutureless valve implantation. This approach enhances surgical efficiency, reduces cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and aortic cross-clamp time, and lowers the risk of complications, particularly in older or high-risk patients for conventional open-heart surgery. This article aims to present perioperative nursing care plans based on a case study of a 64-year-old Thai female diagnosed with aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation who underwent RMT-SLAVR. Nursing care was structured using the Perioperative Nursing Data Set (PNDS) developed by the Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses (AORN), which consists of nursing diagnoses, interventions,and expected outcomes. The care plan emphasized a holistic approach, identifying five primary nursing diagnoses: 1) Knowledge deficit related to the surgical procedure; 2) Anxiety about the surgery and outcomes; 3) Risk of retained surgical items; 4) Risk of injury from operating room instruments and environment; and 5) Risk of impaired cardiac, cerebral, or vascular tissue integrity due to CPB.


Nurses play a crucial role in assessing both physical and psychosocial risk factors,especially in older patients with comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, or cognitive impairment. Preoperative preparation includes providing visual materials, encouraging patient questions, and involving family members to reduce anxiety. Intraoperatively, nurses required specialized skills to prepare and handle devices such as video-assisted equipment and extended retractors, as well as to ensure accurate instrument counts to prevent the retention of items. Nursing care also included proper patient positioning, temperature regulation, emergency readiness (e.g.,defibrillator setup),  and collaboration with the multidisciplinary team, including surgeons,anesthesiologists, and perfusion technologists. Postoperatively, nurses were responsible for assessing vital signs, circulation, and level of consciousness prior to transferring patients from the operating room.


This case study highlights the need for specialized knowledge and skills in perioperative nursing care for RMT-SLAVR patients, as well as systematic interdisciplinary collaboration. The PNDS framework supports comprehensive planning to address both physical and psychological aspects of care, aiming for optimal safety, comfort, and outcomes. Future applications of this nursing approach could extend to other minimally invasive cardiac surgeries, such as mitral valve repair, minimally invasive coronary artery bypass, or hybrid procedures. The dissemination of such case-based knowledge is valuable for both clinical practice and professional development in cardiac surgical nursing.


Keywords : Aortic valve, Case study, Minimally invasive surgery, Perioperative nursing,Perioperative Nursing Data Set (PNDS), Sutureless

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Chaiyaroj S, Pichaiphanupatt P. Perioperative Care for Patients Undergoing Right Mini-Thoracotomy Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case-Based Approach. Nurs Res Inno J [internet]. 2025 Aug. 28 [cited 2025 Dec. 31];31(2). available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RNJ/article/view/253831
Section
Academic Articles

References

Phan K, Tsai YC, Niranjan N, Bouchard D, Carrel TP,Dapunt OE, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):100–11. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.02.05

Berretta P, Andreas M, Carrel TP, Solinas M, Teoh K,Fischlein T, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment valves:a report from an international registry (Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry). Eur J

Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(4):793–9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz109

Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Gilmanov D, Concistrè G, Farneti P, Glauber M, et al. Exploring the learning curve for minimally invasive sutureless aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(6):1537–46.e1.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.040

Chauvette V, Mazine A, Bouchard D. Ten-year experience with the Perceval S sutureless prosthesis: lessons learned and future perspectives. J Vis Surg. 2018;4:83. doi:10.21037/jovs.2018.07.02

Glauber M, Gilmanov D, Farneti PA, Kallushi E, Miceli A, Chiaramonti F, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(3):548–56.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.029

Solinas M, Bianchi G, Chiaramonti F, Margaryan R,Kallushi E, Gasbarri T, et al. Right anterior mini-thoracotomy and sutureless valves: the perfect marriage.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;9(4):305–12. doi:10.21037/acs-2020-rmvs-27

Tamagnini G, Biondi R, Giglio MD. Aortic valve replacement via right anterior mini-thoracotomy: the conventional procedure performed through a smaller incision. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;36:120–4. doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0493

Gilmanov D, Farneti PA, Miceli A, Bevilacqua S, Glauber M. Perceval S sutureless aortic valve prosthesis implantation via a right anterior minithoracotomy. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;2013:mmt012. doi: 10.1093/mmcts/mmt012

Di Eusanio M, Phan K. Sutureless aortic valve replacement.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):123–30. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.03.02

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons of Thailand. Heart surgery statistics in Thailand 2001–2019 [Internet].Updated 2021 May 16. Available from: https://ststhai.org/en/stats/

Cardiothoracic Surgery Unit. Cardiothoracic Surgery Unit Statistics 2016–2020. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University.

Roland RR, Pibarot P. Prosthetic heart valves part 1 –selection. e-J Cardiol Pract. 2021;20(1):1.

Javakijkarnjanakul V, Chaiyaroj S, Lertsitthichai P,Rattananont O, Ruaengsri C. Prospective nonrandomised comparative study of right mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement between sutureless and sutured pericardial bioprostheses in septuagenarians. Heart Lung Circ.2018;27(Suppl 2):S517–8. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2018.06.398

Pichaiphanupatt P, Chaiyaroj S, Jiraratkul S. Perioperative nursing in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a role of cardiac operating nurse. Thai J Cardio-Thorac Nurs.2022;33(1):19–34. (in Thai)

Hinkle JL, Cheever KH. Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd; 2018.

Phillips N. Berry & Kohn’s operating room technique. St.Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Duangnatet D, Thongjarean P. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): role of perioperative nurse. Thai Periop Nurses Assoc J. 2012;2(5):1–11. (in Thai)

Chiannilkulchai N, Pichaiphanupatt P. Effectiveness of a rotating-leg prepper for reducing pressure injury and preventing surgical site infection in patients undergoing heart surgery: paired matching randomised controlled trial.Int Wound J. 2025;22(4):e70371. doi:10.1111/iwj.20371

Teingtrakul S, Boonyarit BB. Perioperative nursing.Bangkok: Offset Plus; 2015. 352 p. (in Thai)

Fencl JL. Guideline implementation: prevention of retained surgical items. AORN J. 2016;104(1):37–48. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2016.04.007

Asiyanbola B, Etienne-Cummings R, Lewi JS. Prevention and diagnosis of retained foreign bodies through the years:past, present, and future technologies. Technol Health Care. 2012;20(5):379–86. doi: 10.3233/THC-2012-0683

Norton EK, Martin C, Micheli AJ. Patients count on it: an initiative to reduce incorrect counts and prevent retained surgical items. AORN J. 2012;95(1):109–21. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2011.05.022

Rupp CC, Kagarise MJ, Nelson SM, Deal AM, Phillips S, Chadwick J, et al. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients. J Am Coll Surg.2012;215(4):524–33.doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. 2012.05.024

Rowlands A, Steeves R. Incorrect surgical counts: a qualitative analysis. AORN J. 2010;92(4):410–9. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2010.01.017

Jackson S, Brady S. Counting difficulties: retained instruments, sponges, and needles. AORN J.2 0 0 8 ; 8 7 ( 2 ) : 3 1 5 – 2 1 . d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j .aorn.2007.06.022

Chance EA, Florence D, Abdoul IS. The effectiveness of checklists and error reporting systems in enhancing patient safety and reducing medical errors in hospital settings: a narrative review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2024.

Harper MG, Whiteside D, Warren JI, MacDonald R, Ulrich B. The Association for Nursing Professional Development National Preceptor Practice Analysis Study: an exploration of precepting in perioperative settings. AORN J.2023;118(1):24–34. doi: 10.1002/ aorn. 13834

ECRI Institute. ECRI’s “Top 10 Technology Hazards.”2011.

World Health Organization. Safety checklist and implementation manual. Geneva: WHO; 2008.

Trinkoff A, Geiger-Brown J, Caruso C, Lipscomb J,Johantgen M, Nelson A, et al. Patient safety and quality:an evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville (MD):AHRQ Publication; 2008.

Egorova NN, Moskowitz A, Gelijns A, Weinberg A, Curty J, Rabin-Fastman B, et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008;247(1):13–8. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815f63c4