THE LEGITIMACY OF CONTRACT TERMINATION IN PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL UNDER FIFA REGULATIONS AND CAS RULINGS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes the legitimacy of terminating professional football players' contracts under allegations of coercion to sign consent agreements, based on FIFA regulations and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) practices. It emphasizes the protection of athletes' rights and the promotion of fairness at the international level. The content presents methods to prove that contract termination resulted from coercion and examines case studies to illustrate appropriate practices in such situations. The findings indicate that contract termination without clear justification or arising from coercion can render agreements void. Athletes were entitled to claim compensation, such as outstanding wages or other costs, under FIFA and CAS frameworks. This article highlights that ensuring justice in the process of contract termination is crucial for reducing disputes and establishing transparent negotiation standards in professional football. Clubs and players should strictly adhere to FIFA regulations to minimize conflicts and uphold contractual rights.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The published article is a copyright of the Academic Journal of Thailand National Sports University. The passage appeared in each article in this academic journal is a perspective of each author which is not related to the journal. Each author is required to be responsible for all components of his/her own article. If there are any mistakes, each author must be responsible for those mistakes on his/her own.
References
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). (2008). CAS 2007/A/1298 Wigan Athletic FC v. Heart of Midlothian & CAS 2007/A/1299 Heart of Midlothian v. Webster & Wigan Athletic FC & CAS 2007/A/1300 Webster v. Heart of Midlothian. Award of 30 January 2008. Retrieved from https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/1298,% 201299,%201300.pdf
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). (2009). CAS 2008/A/1519 & 1520 Matuzalem v. Real Zaragoza SAD & FIFA. Retrieved from https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared %20Documents/1519,%201520.pdf
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). (2015). CAS 2014/A/3684 Leandro da Silva v. Sport Lisboa e Benfica & CAS 2014/A/3693 Sport Lisboa e Benfica v. Leandro da Silva. Retrieved from https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/ 3684%2C%203693.pdf
Court of Arbitration for Sport. (2018). CAS 2017/A/5481 Oussama Assaidi v. Al-Ahli FC: Award of 11 June 2018. Lausanne, Switzerland: Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). (2020) CAS 2020/A/6727 Benjamin Acheampong v. Zamalek Sports Club: award of 8 December 2020. Lausanne: Tribunal Arbitral du Sport. Retrieved from https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared%20Documents/ 6727.pdf
Department of Labour Protection and Welfare, Ministry of Labour. (1998). Labour protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998). Retrieved from https://www.mol.go.th/en/labour-law
Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA). (2023). Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP). Retrieved from FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players - SAFA.net
Gardiner, S., O’Leary, J., Welch, R., Boyes, S., & Naidoo, U. (2021). Sports law. London: Routledge.
Office of the Council of State. (2013). Professional sports promotion Act B.E. 2556 (2013). Retrieved from https://www.mol.go.th/en/labour-law