Postoperative Analgesic Effect in Pediatric Lower Limb Procedure between Epidural Analgesia and Continuous Opioids Intravenous Infusion
Keywords:
caudal blockAbstract
Background: Controlling pain after pediatric lower limb
surgery has several methods. However, there are no
comparative studies for postoperative analgesic effect in
pediatric lower limb procedure between epidural analgesia
and continuous opioids intravenous infusion.
Objectives: We compared epidural analgesia and
continuous opioids intravenous infusion after general
anesthesia for postoperative analgesic effect and
complications in pediatric patients.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was enrolled
in pediatric patients who underwent elective lower limb
surgery and received different postoperative pain control
between 2012-2014.
Results: One hundred-eleven patients were divided into
3 groups; continuous epidural analgesia (Epidural group)
(n=33), caudal block with continuous opioids intravenous
group (Caudal with intravenous group) (n=32) and
continuous opioids intravenous group (Intravenous group)
(n=46). Morphine consumption after pediatric lower limb
surgery in Epidural group were significantly lower than
Caudal with intravenous group and Intravenous group
(mean 0.07 ± 0.04, 0.38 ± 0.20, 0.34 ± 0.22 mg/kg/day,
p<0.001 respectively). Pruritus within 24 hours and after 24 hours of surgery were adverse effect significantly in
Epidural group than Caudal with intravenous group and
Intravenous group (p=0.003 and p=0.038 respectively).
Conclusions: Continuous epidural analgesia for
postoperative pain control in pediatric lower limb surgery
patients was the best choice for reduction morphine
consumption.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Copyright of all articles published in the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is held by the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology, the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand. Submission of a manuscript constitutes the authors' agreement that, upon acceptance for publication, copyright of the work is transferred to the Journal. The content and any opinions expressed in published articles are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial board or the Royal College of Anesthesiologists of Thailand.
Licensing
All articles are published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, anyone may copy and redistribute published articles in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and to the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology as the original source of publication, a link to the license is included, and the material is not modified in any way. Requests for commercial use or for adaptation of published material should be directed to the editorial office.
Authors' Rights
Although copyright is held by the Journal, authors retain the right to reuse their own published material in their future scholarly works, theses and dissertations, teaching, and academic presentations, and to deposit the final published version (PDF) in institutional or subject repositories or on personal and institutional websites, without embargo, provided that the Thai Journal of Anesthesiology is clearly acknowledged as the original place of publication.