Five common echocardiographic pitfalls in septic shock
Echocardiographic pitfalls in septic shock
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54205/ccc.v34.284157Keywords:
Critical care, Echocardiography, Fluid therapy, Point-of-care systems, Septic shock, Ventricular dysfunctionAbstract
Bedside echocardiography is increasingly used to guide hemodynamic management in septic shock, but its value depends on correct interpretation and integration with the patient’s evolving physiology. This narrative review examines five recurrent pitfalls that may lead to inappropriate fluid administration, delayed recognition of ventricular dysfunction, or suboptimal vasoactive treatment. A focused search of PubMed from database inception through 15 July 2026 and major critical care and echocardiography guidance documents informed the review. The five pitfalls are relying on left ventricular ejection fraction alone; failing to assess right ventricular function systematically; administering fluid without evaluating venous congestion; using static preload indices rather than validated dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness; and treating echocardiography as a single diagnostic event rather than a serial monitoring tool. A structured corrective approach is proposed for each pitfall. Fluid responsiveness, fluid tolerance, and the clinical indication for fluids are treated as separate questions. The review also emphasizes the technical prerequisites of dynamic tests, the limitations of venous excess ultrasound, and the distinction between focused cardiac ultrasound and comprehensive echocardiography. Echocardiography should integrate ventricular function, flow, loading conditions, congestion, and treatment response into a coherent bedside phenotype.
Downloads
References
Díaz-Gómez JL, Sharif S, Ablordeppey E, Lanspa MJ, Basmaji J, Carver T, et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines on adult critical care ultrasonography: focused update 2024. Crit Care Med. 2025;53(2):e447-e458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006530.
Vieillard-Baron A, Millington SJ, Sanfilippo F, Chew M, Diaz-Gomez J, McLean A, et al. A decade of progress in critical care echocardiography: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(6):770-788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05604-2.
Neskovic AN, Skinner H, Price S, Via G, De Hert S, Stankovic I, et al. Focus cardiac ultrasound core curriculum and core syllabus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(5):475-481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey006.
Lukić I, Mihić D, Canecki Varžić S, Selthofer Relatić K, Zibar L, Loinjak D, et al. Septic cardiomyopathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024;25(1):23. doi: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2501023.
Sanfilippo F, Corredor C, Fletcher N, Landesberg G, Benedetto U, Foex P, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(6):1004-1013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-3748-7.
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF 3rd, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(4):277-314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011.
Lanspa MJ, Cirulis MM, Wiley BM, Olsen TD, Wilson EL, Beesley SJ, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction in early sepsis and septic shock. Chest. 2021;159(3):1055-1063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.274.
Kim JS, Kim YJ, Kim M, Ryoo SM, Kim WY. Association between right ventricle dysfunction and poor outcome in patients with septic shock. Heart. 2020;106(21):1665-1671. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316889.
Vallabhajosyula S, Kumar M, Pandompatam G, Sakhuja A, Kashyap R, Kashani K, et al. Prognostic impact of isolated right ventricular dysfunction in sepsis and septic shock: an 8-year historical cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7:94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0319-9.
Repessé X, Charron C, Vieillard-Baron A. Acute cor pulmonale in ARDS: rationale for protecting the right ventricle. Chest. 2015;147(1):259-265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0877.
Mukherjee M, Rudski LG, Addetia K, Afilalo J, D'Alto M, Freed BH, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults and special considerations in pulmonary hypertension: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025;38(3):141-186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2025.01.006.
Harjola VP, Mebazaa A, Čelutkienė J, Bettex D, Bueno H, Chioncel O, et al. Contemporary management of acute right ventricular failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Association and the Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(3):226-241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.478.
Vallabhajosyula S, Shankar A, Vojjini R, Cheungpasitporn W, Sundaragiri PR, DuBrock HM, et al. Impact of right ventricular dysfunction on short-term and long-term mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of 1,373 patients. Chest. 2021;159(6):2254-2263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.016.
Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, Bouchard J, Lamarche Y, Spiegel R, et al. Quantifying systemic congestion with point-of-care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J. 2020;12:16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-020-00163-w.
Muñoz F, Born P, Bruna M, Ulloa R, González C, Philp V, et al. Coexistence of a fluid responsive state and venous congestion signals in critically ill patients: a multicenter observational proof-of-concept study. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04834-1.
Prager R, Arntfield R, Wong MYS, Ball I, Lewis K, Rochwerg B, et al. Venous congestion in septic shock quantified with point-of-care ultrasound: a pilot prospective multicentre cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2024;71(5):640-649. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02717-1.
Malbrain MLNG, Marik PE, Witters I, Cordemans C, Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(5):361-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.5603/AIT.2014.0060.
de Freitas Chaves RC, Barbas CSV, Queiroz VNF, Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Pereira AJ, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness using pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, plethysmographic variability index, central venous pressure, and inferior vena cava variation in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05078-9.
Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(12):1935-1947. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4134-1.
Monnet X, Teboul JL. Assessment of fluid responsiveness: recent advances. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24(3):190-195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000501.
Si X, Song X, Lin Q, Nie Y, Zhang G, Xu H, et al. Does end-expiratory occlusion test predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock. 2020;54(6):751-760. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001545.
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795-1815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z.
Aboumarie HS, Tavazzi G, Via G, Guarracino F, Stankovic I, Hagendorff A, et al. Cardiac ultrasound in cardiovascular emergency and critical care: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, the Acute CardioVascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology, and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025;26(11):1699-1724. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf246.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Thai Society of Critical Care Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
