Fixed Scale-Referenced Versus Minimal Passing Level-Referenced Scaling Methods for Grading: The Perspective for Practice

Permphan Dharmasaroja

doi:10.33165/rmj.2022.45.2.255947

Authors

Permphan Dharmasaroja Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33165/rmj.2022.45.2.255947

Keywords:

Grading, Minimal passing level, Assessment

Abstract

Setting standards is an important aspect of a grading system, which should be fair, reasonable, practical, and transparent. Distinct types of assessments result in different score distributions and different pass grades, and substantial errors can occur during aggregation of scores from multiple types of assessment. Thus, converting scores to a common grade structure is therefore essential. Different methods for the final grading of a course can cause the potential of disparity in course grades. The present work provides illustrative examples of 2 fixed scale-referenced grading methods and the minimal passing level-referenced grading method to demonstrate the potential of discrepancy of different grading scales. Perspectives for practice are provided.

References

Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ. 2003;37(5):464-469. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01495.x

George S, Haque MS, Oyebode F. Standard setting: comparison of two methods. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:46. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-6-46

McLachlan JC, Whiten SC. Marks, scores and grades: scaling and aggregating student assessment outcomes. Med Educ. 2000;34(10):788-797. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00664.x

Vella F. A handbook for teachers in universities and colleges: a guide to improving teaching methods: by D Newble and R Cannon. pp 159. St Martin’s Press, New York. 1989 ISBN 0-312-03196-3. Biochemical Education. 1990;18(4):211. doi:10.1016/0307-4412(90)90143-C

Monash University. Learning and Teaching: Teach HQ: Weighting aggregation, 2022. Accessed January 15, 2022. https://www.monash.edu/learning-teaching/teachhq/moodle/gradebook/how-to/weighting-aggregation

Angoff WH. Scales, Norms, and Equivalent Scores. In: Thorndike RL, ed. Educational Measurement. 2nd ed. American Council on Education; 1971:508-600.

Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CP. A standard setting method with the best performing students as point of reference: practical and affordable. Med Teach. 2010;32(2):154-160. doi:10.3109/01421590903196979

Taylor CA. Development of a modified Cohen method of standard setting. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):e678-e682. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.611192

Ben-David MF. AMEE Guide No. 18: standard setting in student assessment. Med Teach. 2000;22(2):120-130. doi:10.1080/01421590078526

Lowry S. Assessment of students. BMJ. 1993;306(6869):51-54. doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6869.51

Arunyingmongkol S, Laisnitsarekul B. SB-8: the eight-category grading program. Chula Med J. 1998;42(7):587-597.