Ultrasound in Patients With Clinically Suspected Submandibular Gland Disease

Authors

  • Phatthawit Tangkittithaworn Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Supatcha Khampaen Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Suphaneewan Jaovisidha Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Rawee Manatrakul Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Patarawan Woratanarat Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Pawin Numthavaj Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Praman Fuangfa Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33165/rmj.2024.47.4.270410

Keywords:

Submandibular gland, Submandibular disease, Salivary, Ultrasound, Sjögren syndrome

Abstract

Background: The submandibular gland is quite common to be affected by various disease processes in all age groups that may be difficult to differentiate clinically. Its superficial location makes it readily accessible to ultrasound evaluation.

Objective: To evaluate sonographic features of abnormal submandibular gland.

Methods: Ultrasound images and medical records of patients who presented with clinically suspected submandibular gland disease at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, final diagnoses, further management, and sonographic findings were evaluated.

Results: Eighty-one patients were identified, 56 females and 25 males (mean [SD] age, 53 [16] years; range, 1 - 87 years). The main presenting symptoms were palpable mass (31 [38.3%]) and pain (23 [28.4%]) involving the left (30 [37.0%]), the right (27 [33.3%]), and bilateral submandibular area (24 [29.6%]). Only 6 patients (8.1%) underwent further imaging. The most common final diagnoses were acute sialadenitis (38 [46.9%]), Sjögren syndrome (14 [17.3%]), tumor (6 [7.4%]), and stone (4 [4.9%]). Submandibular glands were normal in 17 of 81 patients (21%); 9 of 17 (52.9%) had abnormal lymph nodes. Among various disease entities, a significant correlation was found between Sjögren syndrome and small gland size, stone and ductal dilatation, and abnormal lymph nodes with enlarged nodal size (P < .001).

Conclusions: Two-thirds of the patients had inflammatory/infectious diseases, with tumor and stone in minority. Certain ultrasound findings can suggest diagnosis. Less than 10% underwent further imaging, suggesting that ultrasound can be used to detect and guide further management of submandibular disease.

References

Bialek EJ, Jakubowski W, Zajkowski P, Szopinski KT, Osmolski A. US of the major salivary glands: anatomy and spatial relationships, pathologic conditions, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2006;26(3):745-763. doi:10.1148/rg.263055024

Rabinov JD. Imaging of salivary gland pathology. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38(5):1047-1057. doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70220-7

Gadve V, Mohite A, Bang K, Shenoi SR. Unusual giant sialolith of Wharton’s duct. Indian J Dent. 2016;7(3):162-164. doi:10.4103/0975-962X.174594

Howlett DC, Alyas F, Wong KT, et al. Sonographic assessment of the submandibular space. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(12):1070-1078. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2004.06.025

Lorenzon M, Spina E, Tulipano Di Franco F, Giovannini I, De Vita S, Zabotti A. Salivary gland ultrasound in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: current and future perspectives. Open Access Rheumatol. 2022;14:147-160. doi:10.2147/OARRR.S284763

Straughan AJ, Badger CD, Benito DA, Joshi AS. Salivary gland ultrasound training: improving anatomic identification in residents. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(6):102734. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102734

Katz P, Hartl DM, Guerre A. Clinical ultrasound of the salivary glands. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(6):973-1000. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2009.08.009

Gritzmann N, Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Hübner E. Sonography of the salivary glands. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(5):964-975. doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1586-9

Alyas F, Lewis K, Williams M, et al. Diseases of the submandibular gland as demonstrated using high resolution ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(928):362-369. doi:10.1259/bjr/93120352

Garg K, Kapila S, Gulati A, Azad RK, Thakur JS. Sonographic and cytological evaluation of salivary gland Tumors. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;75(4):3427-3431. doi:10.1007/s12070-023-04020-9

Choi I, Na DG, Paik W. Ultrasonographic echogenicity of normal salivary glands in adults: comparison of submandibular and parotid glands. Ultrasonography. 2021;40(3):342-348. doi:10.14366/usg.20070

Baldini C, Zabotti A, Filipovic N, et al. Imaging in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: the ‘obsolete and the new’. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36 Suppl 112(3):215-221.

Salaffi F, Argalia G, Carotti M, Giannini FB, Palombi C. Salivary gland ultrasonography in the evaluation of primary Sjögren’s syndrome. comparison with minor salivary gland biopsy. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(5):1229-1236.

Lanjekar A, Kukde MM, Madne I, Deotale KR, Bankar NJ. Pivotal role of ultrasonography and radiology in diagnosing a case of sialolith. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e51269. doi:10.7759/cureus.51269

Zengel P, Schrötzlmair F, Reichel C, Paprottka P, Clevert DA. Sonography: the leading diagnostic tool for diseases of the salivary glands. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2013;34(3):196-203. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2012.11.012

Marchal F, Kurt AM, Dulguerov P, Lehmann W. Retrograde theory in sialolithiasis formation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(1):66-68. doi:10.1001/archotol.127.1.66

Gritzmann N. Sonography of the salivary glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(1):161-166. doi:10.2214/ajr.153.1.161

Orloff LA, Hwang HS, Jecker P. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of salivary disease. Oper Tech Otolaryngol -Head Neck Surg. 2009;20:136-144.

Tassoker M, Ozcan S. Two cases of submandibular sialolithiasis detected by cone beam computed tomography. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15(8):124-129. doi:10.9790/0853-150810124129

Yousem DM, Kraut MA, Chalian AA. Major salivary gland imaging. Radiology. 2000;216(1):19-29. doi:10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl4519

Koischwitz D, Gritzmann N. Ultrasound of the neck. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38(5):1029-1045. doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70219-0

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

1.
Tangkittithaworn P, Khampaen S, Jaovisidha S, Manatrakul R, Woratanarat P, Numthavaj P, Fuangfa P. Ultrasound in Patients With Clinically Suspected Submandibular Gland Disease. Rama Med J [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 25 [cited 2025 Jan. 2];47(4):1-11. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ramajournal/article/view/270410

Issue

Section

Original Articles