[2026-01-28] Comparison of Initial Absolute Monocyte Counts in 7-Day Recovery vs Nonrecovery Neutrophil Counts After Chemotherapy in Patients With Solid Organ Malignancy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33165/rmj.2027.e275424

Keywords:

Chemotherapy-induce neutropenia, Neutrophil, Absolute neutrophil count, Monocyte, Absolute monocyte count, Recovery from neutropenia

Abstract

Background: Neutropenia following chemotherapy is a common side effect that often delays treatment cycles, potentially affecting therapeutic outcomes in patients with cancer. Studies suggest that baseline monocyte count may predict neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy, aiding in better treatment planning.

Objective: To investigate the association between the initial monocyte count on the day of neutropenia and neutrophil recovery on day 7. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: recovery (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≥ 1500 cells/µL) and nonrecovery (ANC < 1500 cells/µL).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Chonburi Hospital, and the records of patients with solid organ malignancy who received chemotherapy from 1 January 2022 to 31 August 2023, were analyzed. Patients with neutropenia on chemotherapy day were included in the study. The initial monocyte count was compared between patients who recovered on day 7 and those who did not. Predictive power was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: Of 42 patients, 29 (69.04%) achieved neutrophil recovery. The initial monocyte count was significantly higher in the recovery group than in the nonrecovery group (mean [SD], 422.97 [144.66] vs 272.00 [82.13] cells/µL; P = .001). An initial monocyte count of ≥ 375 cells/µL was identified as a predictive threshold for recovery, with an AUROC of 0.803, sensitivity of 58.6%, and specificity of 100%.

Conclusions: The initial monocyte count significantly differs between patients who recover and those who do not. A threshold of ≥ 375 cells/µL accurately predicts neutrophil recovery on day 7, potentially optimizing chemotherapy scheduling.

References

Bodensteiner DC, Doolittle GC. Adverse haematological complications of anticancer drugs. Clinical presentation,management and avoidance. Drug Saf. 1993;8(3):213-224. doi:10.2165/00002018-199308030-00003

Weycker D, Li X, Edelsberg J, et al. Risk and consequences of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic solid tumors. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(1):47-54. doi:10.1200/JOP.2014.001492

Khan S, Dhadda A, Fyfe D, Sundar S. Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned chemotherapy for solid tumours. Eur J Cancer Care). 2008;17(1):19-25. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00797.x

Fortner BV, Tauer KW, Okon T, Houts AC, Schwartzberg LS. Experiencing neutropenia: quality of life interviews with adult cancer patients. BMC Nurs. 2005;4:4. doi:10.1186/1472-6955-4-4

Lyman GH, Dale DC, Culakova E, et al. The impact of the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on chemotherapy dose intensity and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(10):2475-2484. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt226

Li S, Liu J, Bowers C, et al. Febrile neutropenia-related care and associated costs in elderly patients with breast cancer, lung cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 28(1):113-122. doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04795-0

Lyman GH, Abella E, Pettengell R. Risk factors for febrile neutropenia among patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;90(3):190-199. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.12.006

Crawford J, Becker PS, Armitage JO, et al. Myeloid growth factors, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(12):1520-1541. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2017.0175

Shah BD, Zuckerman KS. Normal and Malignant Hematopoiesis. In: Saba HI, Mufti G, eds. Advances in Malignant Hematology. Wiley-Blackwell; 2011:440.

Ishizaka Y, Motoyoshi K, Hatake K, Saito M, Takaku F, Miura Y. Mode of action of human urinary colony-stimulating factor. Exp Hematol. 1986;14(1):1-8.

Wieser M, Bonifer R, Oster W, Lindemann A, Mertelsmann R, Herrmann F. Interleukin-4 induces secretion of CSF for granulocytes and CSF for macrophages by peripheral blood monocytes. Blood. 1989;73(5):1105-1108.

Sugimoto Y, Katayama N, Masuya M, et al. Differential cell division history between neutrophils and macrophages in their development from granulocyte-macrophage progenitors. Br J Haematol. 2006;135(5):725-731. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06367.x

Ouyang W, Liu Y, Deng D, Zhou F, Xie C. The change in peripheral blood monocyte count: a predictor to make the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(Supplement):S565-S570. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.177502

Moriyama Y, Horita N, Kudo M, et al. Monocyte nadir is a possible indicator for neutrophil nadir during lung cancer chemotherapy. Clin Respir J. 2017;11(4):453-458. doi:10.1111/crj.12358

Yottasan P. The Prediction of Neutrophil Recovery by Increasing Monocyte Count, A Prospective Study. Master' s thesis. Chulalongkorn University; 2021. Accessed 2 December 2025. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/5693

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

1.
Leelasawat J, Lagampan C. [2026-01-28] Comparison of Initial Absolute Monocyte Counts in 7-Day Recovery vs Nonrecovery Neutrophil Counts After Chemotherapy in Patients With Solid Organ Malignancy. Res Med J [internet]. 2026 Jan. 28 [cited 2026 Jan. 29];:e275424. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ramajournal/article/view/275424

Issue

Section

Original Articles