[2026-10-01] Association Between ICU Admission Delay After Vasopressor Initiation and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33165/rmj.2027.e282361

Keywords:

Septic shock, ICU admission delay, Vasopressor, In-hospital mortality

Abstract

Background: Delayed intensive care unit (ICU) transfer after the emergency department (ED) management of septic shock is associated with poor outcomes. However, most studies define delay from ED arrival, which may not accurately reflect the onset of hemodynamic instability requiring ICU-level care.

Objective: To investigate the association between the delay in ICU admission after vasopressor initiation and in-hospital mortality of patients with septic shock.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with septic shock treated at the Phrapokklao Hospital ED from January 2024 to December 2025. Index time was defined as vasopressor initiation in the ED, or ED arrival for patients already receiving vasopressors before transfer. The primary exposure was ICU admission delay, and the outcome was in-hospital mortality. Data were analyzed using multivariable models, with restricted cubic spline analysis to assess nonlinear associations.

Results: Among 317 patients with septic shock, in-hospital mortality was 29.0%. ICU admission delay was significantly associated with mortality, with risk increasing per hour of delay (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.33 per hour; 95% CI, 1.73-3.15; P < .001). Patients delayed ≥ 2 hours had higher mortality than those admitted within 2 hours (45.9% vs 6.6%; aOR, 9.21; 95% CI, 3.96-21.42; P < .001). A dose-response relationship was observed across delay quartiles (P for trend < .001), with consistent findings in walk-in and referred subgroups.

Conclusions: ICU admission delay after vasopressor initiation was independently associated with increased mortality, with risk increasing progressively over time. The 2-hour cutoff represents an operational, not a physiological, threshold. Potential residual confounding warrants cautious interpretation.

References

Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200-211. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y

Carlbom DJ, Rubenfeld GD. Barriers to implementing protocol-based sepsis resuscitation in the emergency department—results of a national survey. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(11):2525-2532. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000298122.49245.d7

Anesi GL, Liu VX, Gabler NB, et al. Associations of intensive care unit capacity strain with disposition and outcomes of patients with sepsis presenting to the emergency department. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(11):1328-1335. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201804-241OC

Cardoso LT, Grion CM, Matsuo T, et al. Impact of delayed admission to intensive care units on mortality of critically ill patients: a cohort study. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R28. doi:10.1186/cc9975

Li Q, Wang J, Liu G, et al. Prompt admission to intensive care is associated with improved survival in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(10):4071-4081. doi:10.1177/0300060518781253

Kiekkas P, Tzenalis A, Gklava V, Stefanopoulos N, Voyagis G, Aretha D. Delayed admission to the intensive care unit and mortality of critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:4083494. doi:10.1155/2022/4083494

Groenland CNL, Termorshuizen F, Rietdijk WJR, et al. Emergency department to ICU time is associated with hospital mortality: a registry analysis of 14,788 patients from six university hospitals in the Netherlands. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(11):1564-1571. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003957

Zhang Z, Bokhari F, Guo Y, Goyal H. Prolonged length of stay in the emergency department and increased risk of hospital mortality in patients with sepsis requiring ICU admission. Emerg Med J. 2019;36(2):82-87. doi:10.1136/emermed-2018-208032

Cha JH, Kang D, Ko RE, et al. Association between emergency department-to-intensive care unit transfer time and mortality in patients with septic shock: a target trial emulation with septic shock in South Korea. Acute Crit Care. 2025;40(4):548-556. doi:10.4266/acc.003575

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287

La Via L, Maniaci A, Lentini M, et al. The burden of sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit. J Clin Med. 2025;14(19):6691. doi:10.3390/jcm14196691

Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(6):925-928. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0

Lasater KB, Sloane DM, McHugh MD, et al. Evaluation of hospital nurse-to-patient staffing ratios and sepsis bundles on patient outcomes. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(7):868-873. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.002

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

1.
Nakaviroj S. [2026-10-01] Association Between ICU Admission Delay After Vasopressor Initiation and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Res Med J [internet]. 2026 Oct. 1 [cited 2026 Oct. 25];:e282361. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ramajournal/article/view/282361

Issue

Section

Original Articles