Effect of Modified Early Warning Scores(MEWS) on the treatment of patients with sepsis at the ward in Ban Phue Hospital
Keywords:
Clinical Practice Guidelines, Caring, Sepsis, MEWSAbstract
The objective of this study aimed to study the clinical outcomes based on the protocol after using the clinical guidelines by using the Modified Early Warning Scores (MEWS) on the treatment of patients with sepsis at the ward in Ban Phue Hospital. Early recognition and diagnosis of sepsis is required to prevent the transition into septic shock which is associated with a mortality rate. This Cross-sectional Descriptive Study was conducted with 197 study group patients who were diagnosed with sepsis from August 1st, 2018 – January 31st, 2019 and 203 patient in control group. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square.
The results showed the proportion of severe sepsis or septic shock before and after using the Modified Early Warning Scores (MEWS) on the treatment of patients with sepsis was 58.62% and 54.31% respectively with no significantly different (p<0.38,95% CI 0.79 - 1.80). The mortality rate in patients with sepsis was 14.78 % and 12.69 % respectively no significantly different (p<0.54, 95% CI 0.65- 2.21).
References
Tools for Early Identification of at-Risk Patients and Treatment Protocol Implementation. Crit Care Clin2008;23: 1–47.
2. Ministry of Public Health. Health Statistics. [Serial on the Internet]. [Cited 2014
Feb12]. Available from: www.moph.go.th
3. Lundberg JS, Perl TM, Wiblin T, Costigan MD, Dawson J, Nettleman MD, et al.
Septic shock: ananalysis of outcomes for patients with onset on hospital wards versus intensive care units. Critical Care Medicine 1998;26: 1020-1024.
4. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The Epidemiology of Sepsis in the United
States from 1979 through 2000. New Engl Jounal 2003;348: 1546-54.
5. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J,Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. New Engl Jounal Med 2001; 345:1368–7.
6. Rangel-Frausto S. The Natural History of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) A Prospective Study. JAMA 1995; 273(2): 117-23.
7. Brun-Buisson C. Incidence Risk Factors and Outcome of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adults A Multicenter Prospective Study in Intensive Care Units. JAMA 1995; 274(12): 968-74
8. Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, Giles S, Fox S. The impact of compliance with 6-hour
and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patient with severe sepsis-prospective
observational study. Crit Care 2005; 9: R764-70.
9. Kortgen A, Niederprum P, Baucer M. Implementation of an evidence based “standard operating procedure” and outcome in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 943-9.
10. Micek ST, Roubinian N, Heuring T, Bode M, Williams J, Harrison C, et al. Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2707-13.
11. Otero RM, Nguyen HB, Huang DT, Gaieski DF, Goyal M, Gunnerson KJ, et al. Early
goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock revisited. Concepts, controversies, and contemporary findings. Chest 2006; 130: 1579-95.
12. Jones AE, Kline JA. Use of goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock in academic emergency department. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 1888-9.
13. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 2003; 289:
1969-75.
14. Ho BC, Bellomo R, McGain F, Jones D, Naka T, Wan L, et al. The incidence and
outcome of septic shock patients in the absence of early-goal directed therapy. Crit Care 2006; 10: R80.
15. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, et al.
Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:
2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 296-327.
16. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle 2018. [อินเตอร์เน็ต]. [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 1 กุมภาพันธ์ 2561].
เข้าถึงได้จาก https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00134-018-5085-0
17. ข้อมูลงานเวชระเบียนและสถิติโรงพยาบาลบ้านผือ จำนวนผู้ป่วยโรคติดเชื้อในกระแสโลหิตอย่าง
รุนแรง โรงพยาบาลบ้านผือ อำเภอบ้านผือ จังหวัดอุดรธานี. งานเวชระเบียนและสถิติ โรงพยาบาลบ้านผือ
อำเภอบ้านผือ จังหวัดอุดรธานี; 2559-2561.
18. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Sepsis recognition diagnosis and
early management NICE guideline 2016;1-50. nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
19. Micek ST, Roubinian N, Heuring T, Bode M, Williams J, Harrison C, et al. Before–After Study of a Standardized Hospital Order Set for the Management of Septic Shock. Crit CareMed 2006; 34(11): 2707-13.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
การละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้ส่งบทความโดยตรง
ผลงานที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของผู้นิพนธ์ ขอสงวนสิทธิ์มิให้นำเนื้อหา ทัศนะ หรือข้อคิดเห็นใด ๆ ของบทความในวารสารไปเผยแพร่ทางการค้าก่อนได้รับอนุญาตจากกองบรรณาธิการ อย่างเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษร
