Structural equation modeling analysis factors influencing resilience of the undergraduate students

Authors

  • Theerawat Tippanya Educational Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Education, Naresuan University
  • Siriwan Pansood Educational Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Education, Naresuan University
  • Amornpan Datong Educational Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Education, Naresuan University
  • Parin B. Rattanabhornchai Educational Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Education, Naresuan University
  • Nattakan Prachanban Educational Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Education, Naresuan University

Keywords:

Resilience, Factors Influencing Resilience, Structural Equation Modeling Analysis, Undergraduate students

Abstract

The objectives of this research were 1) to study the relationships between the components of various factors with the resilience skill among undergraduate students, 2) to examine the fit between the structural equation model of factors influencing undergraduate students' Resilience skill and the empirical data, and 3) to investigate the direct, indirect, and total effects of factors influencing undergraduate students' Resilience skill. The sample consisted of 210 undergraduate students at Naresuan University, selected by multi-stage random sampling. The research instruments included scales measuring resilience, self-esteem, optimism, social support, personal growth, and stress confrontation. All of these scales were 5-point Likert scales. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with the Mplus program.

The results revealed that 1) there were 300 positive significant correlations at the .01 level among the observed variables within the model, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.350 to 0.798, 2) the model fit the empirical data well (x2= 241.306, df = 211, p = .0746, CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.991, RMSEA = 0.026, SRMR = 0.029), and 3) three factors had significant total effects on resilience skill at the .05 level: social support (0.850), optimism (0.666), and self-esteem (0.657). The factor with a significant direct effect was self-esteem (0.657), while the factors with significant indirect effects were social support (0.926) and optimism (0.427).

References

กรมสุขภาพจิต. (2563). เปลี่ยนร้ายกลายเป็นดี พลังสุขภาพจิต RQ : Resilience Quotient. สำนักวิชาการสุขภาพจิต กรมสุขภาพจิต กระทรวงสาธารณสุข.

นิธิพัฒน์ เมฆขจร. (2564). ความยืดหยุ่นทางจิตใจ (Resilience): วิถีใหม่ของการเสริมสร้างพลังใจเพื่อการเผชิญวิกฤตชีวิตในยุคปัจจุบัน. วารสารจิตวิทยา มหาวิทยาลัยเกษมบัณฑิต, 11(2), 1-9.

รุจิรา วงศ์วุฒิอักษร. (2564). อิทธิพลของสถานการณ์ความเครียดที่มีต่อการประเมินทางปัญญา การเผชิญปัญหาเพื่อการเปลี่ยนแปลง การเห็นคุณค่าในตนเอง และความหยุ่นตัวของนิสิตปริญญาตรี [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญามหาบัณฑิต ไม่ได้ตีพิมพ์], มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.

สมจิตร์ นคราพานิช และรัตนา พึ่งเสมา. (2564). ปัจจัยทำนายพลังสุขภาพจิตของนักศึกษาพยาบาลชั้นปีที่ 1 วิทยาพยาบาลสภากาชาดไทย. วารสารการพยาบาลจิตและสุขภาพจิต, 35(1), 128-145.

Argyros, G. & Johnson, C. (2018). Psychological Resilience in Higher Education Students: A Systematic Investigation of Predictive Factors. J Psychology, 9(1-2), 18-28. 10.31901/24566292.2019/09.1-2.194

Baguri, E. M., Roslan, S., Hassan, S. A., Krauss, S. E., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2022). How Do Self-Esteem, Dispositional Hope, Crisis Self-Efficacy, Mattering, and Gender Differences Affect Teacher Resilience during COVID-19 School Closures. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074150

Cheraghian, H., Moradian, K. & Nouri, T. (2023). Structural model of resilience based on parental support: the mediating role of hope and active coping. BMC Psychiatry, 23(260), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04678-z

Durso, S., De, O., Afonso, L. E., & Beltman, S. (2021). Resilience in higher education: A conceptual model and its empirical analysis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(156), 1-21.

Grotberg, H. E. (1995). A Guide to Promoting Resilience in Children: Strengthening the Human Spirit. Bernard Van Leer Foundation.

Hu, Y. (2023). Examining the effects of teacher self-compassion, emotion regulation, and emotional labor strategies as predictors of teacher resilience in EFL context. Front. Psychol, 14, 90837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190837

Khairina, K., Roslan, S., Ahmad, N., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., & Mohamad Arsad, N. (2020). Predictors of Resilience among Indonesian Students in Malaysian Universities. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 169-182. 10.24191/ajue.v16i3.11081

Ojo, A. O., Fawehinmi, O., & Yusliza, M. Y. (2021). Examining the Predictors of Resilience and Work Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(5), 2902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052902

Robbins, A., Kaye, E., & Catling, J. C. (2018). Predictors of student resilience in higher education. Psychology Teaching Review, 24(1), 44-52.

Sabouripour, F., Roslan, S., Ghiami, Z., & Memon, M. A. (2021) Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Relationship Between Optimism, Psychological Well-Being, and Resilience Among Iranian Students. Front. Psychol, 12, 675645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675645

Soper, D. S. (2024). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Model. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

Tippanya, T., Pansood, S., Datong, A., B. Rattanabhornchai, P., & Prachanban, N. (2025). Structural equation modeling analysis factors influencing resilience of the undergraduate students. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research and Development (JMARD), 7(2), 13–34. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMARD/article/view/269529