Social Innovation That Affects The Management of Human Resources for People with Disabilities According to The Guidelines of Private Enterprise Entrepreneurs in Bangkok

Authors

  • Boonchan Phansuwan College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Panyada Chantakit College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Chumpon Rodjaem College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Thawatchai Supuean College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University
  • Ekkolarn Chotanusorn College of Innovation and Management, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Social Innovation, Human Resource Management, Disabilities, Private Sector Enterprises

Abstract

This research aimed to (1) investigate the levels of social innovation factors and human resource management (HRM) factors for employees with disabilities, and (2) identify social innovation factors influencing the HRM of employees with disabilities according to the approaches implemented by private sector organizations in Bangkok. The study employed a mixed-methods approach. The samples comprised 333 executives and HR officers, along with 5 key informants. The research instruments included questionnaires and in-depth interview guidelines that passed content validity (IOC = 0.67–1.00) and reliability testing (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.783). Data analysis utilized descriptive statistics, stepwise multiple regression analysis, and content analysis. The results indicated that (1) private organizations in Bangkok highly emphasized the importance of both social innovation factors and HRM factors for disabled employees, and (2) the social innovation factors significantly influencing HRM approaches for employees with disabilities at a statistical significance level of 0.01 included skill and knowledge development, creation of an open organizational culture, adaptation of the work environment, building networks and partnerships, and technology application. The stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that these factors could predict the dependent variable at 77.5%. Implementing social innovation strategies in HRM enables organizations to foster equality and enhance the performance of employees with disabilities. However, successful disability employment relies on systematic skill and knowledge development, cultivating an open organizational culture, and creating a supportive and accessible work environment.

References

กมลพร กัลยาณมิตร และจิรประภา อัครบวร. (2565). การส่งเสริมการจ้างงานคนพิการในองค์กรเอกชน. วารสารการบริหารทรัพยากรมนุษย์, 10(2), 55–72.

กรมส่งเสริมและพัฒนาคุณภาพชีวิตคนพิการ. (2565). สถิติคนพิการในประเทศไทย. กระทรวงการพัฒนาสังคมและความมั่นคงของมนุษย์.

กรมส่งเสริมและพัฒนาคุณภาพชีวิตคนพิการ. (2567). รายงานสถานการณ์การจ้างงานคนพิการในประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2567. กระทรวงการพัฒนาสังคมและความมั่นคงของมนุษย์.

กระทรวงการพัฒนาสังคมและความมั่นคงของมนุษย์. (2560). แผนพัฒนาคุณภาพชีวิตคนพิการแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 5 (พ.ศ. 2560-2564). กระทรวงการพัฒนาสังคมและความมั่นคงของมนุษย์.

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1993). Research in education (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Ginis, K. A. M. (2020). The participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle: Employer concerns and research evidence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(2), 135-158.

Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51.

Cajaiba-Santana, G., & Luu, H. M. (2022). Social innovation and employment opportunities for persons with disabilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(3), 451–468.

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). Harper & Row.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Heinze, R. G., & Naegele, G. (2022). Flexible care systems for the elderly: Social innovation in action. Ageing International, 47(1), 101-120.

Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS.

Kulkarni, M., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2013). Obstacles to success in the workplace for people with disabilities: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 13(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484313485229

Marome, W., & Shaw, R. (2021). Urban resilience and community empowerment: A case study of social innovation in Bangkok. In R. Shaw, A. Daniere, & S. Chatterjee (Eds.), Urban disasters and resilience in Asia (pp. 47-60). Butterworth-Heinemann.

Mulgan, G. (2019). Social innovation: How societies find the power to change. Policy Press.

Nachmias, S., & Caven, V. (Eds.). (2019). Inequality and organisational practice: Employment relations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11647-7

Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2021). Fundamentals of human resource management. McGraw-Hill Education.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Praditphet, N., & Kamnuansilpa, P. (2018). Innovating social innovation: A case study of urban development in Bangkok. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 230-235.

Schur, L., Nishii, L., Adya, M., Kruse, D., Bruyère, S. M., & Blanck, P. (2020). Accommodating employees with and without disabilities. Human Resource Management, 59(2), 139-153.

Singh, K. (2019). Quantitative social research methods. SAGE Publications.

Suwanaketsa, N., Rungreangkulkij, S., & Yimyam, S. (2023). Inclusive employment practices for persons with disabilities in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(1), 56-74.

World Health Organization & World Bank. (2011). Social innovation for disability inclusion: A global perspective. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182

Zhou, Y., Wu, C.-H., Zou, M., & Williams, M. (2020). When is the grass greener on the other side? A longitudinal study of the joint effect of occupational mobility and personality on the honeymoon–hangover experience during job change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(4), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2491

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Phansuwan, B., Chantakit, P., Rodjaem, C., Supuean, T., & Chotanusorn, E. (2026). Social Innovation That Affects The Management of Human Resources for People with Disabilities According to The Guidelines of Private Enterprise Entrepreneurs in Bangkok. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research and Development (JMARD), 8(1), 23–42. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMARD/article/view/274890