The Development of an Innovative Work Behavior Scale for First-line Nurse Managers in Private Hospitals

Main Article Content

Bubpha Kitsahawong
Phechnoy Singchungchai
Netchanok Sritoomma

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the components of an innovative work behavior scale for the first-line nurse managers of private hospitals. A sample of 242 first-line nurse managers was recruited from 19 private hospitals. The research instrument was De Jong and Hartog’s Innovative Work Behavior Scale with 17 question items and a 5-point rating scale. Content validity was validated by a panel of experts;the content validity index, the reliability, and the power of discrimination met the criteria.The statistics used for construct validity were exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The study found that the Innovative Work Behavior Scale consisted of 16 items with four components: 1) surveying of innovative
development ideas behavior (idea exploration) with five indicators, 2) innovative ideaforming behavior (idea generation) with three indicators, 3) adoption of innovative behavior (idea championing) with four indicators, and 4) implementation of innovative behavior (idea implementation) with four indicators. The reliability of each scale component was good. The construct validity of confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the development of innovative work behavior among first-line nurse managers was consistent with the empirical data. Therefore, the results of this study could be used in the development of an innovative work behavior scale for first-line managers of nursing organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Kitsahawong B, Singchungchai P, Sritoomma N. The Development of an Innovative Work Behavior Scale for First-line Nurse Managers in Private Hospitals. Rama Nurs J [Internet]. 2020Aug.30 [cited 2020Dec.5];26(2):203-16. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RNJ/article/view/236839
Section
บทความวิจัย

References

1. Sun Q, Thungjaroenku P, Supamanee T. Transformational leadership of head nurses and team potency in university hospitals, Shanghai, The People’s Republic of China. Nursing Journal. 2018;45(3):136-49. (in Thai)

2. De Jong J, Den Hartog D. Innovative work behavior:measurement and validation. Scientific analysis of
Entrepreneurship and SMEs; 2008.

3. De Jong J, Den Hartog D. Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2010;
19:23–36.

4. Bandansin J. Develop the creativity toward the nursing service. Journal of the Royal Thai Army Nurses.
2014;15(3): 9-17. (in Thai)

5. Contreras F, Espinosa CJ, Dornberger U, Cuero Acosta Y.A. Leadership and employees’ innovative work
behavior: test of a mediation and moderation model. ASS.2017;13(9): 9-25.

6. Deephaisarnsakul P. Strategic development of private hospitals to be corporate governance. Veridian E-Journal,Silpakorn University. 2015;(8)3:229-43. (in Thai)

7. Khungtumneum K. Nursing service innovation. Journal of Phrapokklao Nursing College. 2011;22(2):71-9. (in
Thai)

8. Kunaviktikul W. Teaching and learning in the discipline of nursing in the 21st century. Nursing Journal.
2015;42(2):152-56. (in Thai)

9. Chumkesornkulkit P, Na Wichian S. Innovative work behavior: concept, antecedents and challenges. JBSD.
2018;10(1):25-41. (in Thai)

10. Bagheri A, Akibari M. The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on nurses’ innovation behavior. J Nurs
Scholarsh. 2018;50(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12354. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

11. Lukes M, Stephan U. Measuring employee innovation: a review of existing scales and the development of the
innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res.
2017;23(1):136-58.

12. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2014.

13. Gubta KK, Attri JP, Singh A, Kaur H, Kaur G. Basic concepts for sample size calculation: critical step for any
clinical trials. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10(3): 328-31.

14. Brislin RW. Research instruments. Field methods in crosscultural research: cross-cultural research and methodology series. 1986;8:137-64.

15. Jacox AK, Webster G. Competing theory of science. In Nicoll LH. (Ed.). Perspective in nursing theory. Boston:
Little Brown; 1986.

16. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research. Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Wolters Kluwer
Health, Philadelphia; 2017.