Effects of Mutual Goal Setting Program on Face Down Behavior and Clinical Outcomes in Patients after Gas-Filled Retinal Detachment Surgery
Main Article Content
Abstract
The retina acts as a screen to receive images. When the vitreous humor adheres too tightly to the retina, it can cause traction, leading to retinal detachment. This condition affects the patient's quality of life and, if left untreated, may lead to vision loss. Vitrectomy is a common and effective treatment involving surgery inside the eyeball, where gas is injected to help the retina reattach. Patients must maintain a face-down position after surgery for successful reattachment.This requirement can hinder daily activities. Patients often experience discomfort, neck pain, and back pain, which makes it difficult to maintain the face-down position consistently. Setting shared goals regarding face-down positioning and following up on clinical outcomes in patients after retinal detachment surgery with gas tamponade involves active interaction between nurses and patients. Nurses educate patients using materials, videos, and explanations about retinal detachment and the importance of face-down positioning after surgery. Patients are trained in this positioning before surgery, using personalized strategies and shared goals to determine the number of required hours. This helps patients understand and manage self-care at home, improving surgical outcomes.This study aimed to compare the mean number of hours patients with gas tamponade retinal detachment spent in the face-down position over a 24-hour period between those who received a mutual goal-setting program and those who received standard nursing care. Additionally, it seeks to compare clinical outcomes, including visual acuity and retinal reattachment, between the two groups.
This study was a quasi-experimental research design using a two-group pretest-posttest design with an experimental and a control group. The participants were patients who underwent gas-filled retinal detachment surgery due to retinal holes or tears, traction caused by membranes or vitreous humor, or fluid leakage and accumulation under the retina. The study took place between May 1 and December 25, 2023. A total of 50 patients were purposively selected based on inclusion criteria: aged 18 years or older, undergoing their first retinal detachment surgery, receiving gas tamponade with Octafluoropropane (C3F8) or sulfur hexafluoride (SF6),scheduled for surgery in one eye only with the other eye not diagnosed with blindness, and able to be contacted via telephone or the LINE application. If post-surgery vision was impaired,communication via LINE could be facilitated by a relative. Moreover, those aged 60 and above were screened for cognitive impairment using the Thai version of the 6 Cognitive Impairment Test (6 CIT), with eligible participants scoring less than 8. The sample size was calculated using G*Power, with a power of 0.50, a significance level (α) of 0.05, and an effect size of 0.50,resulting in 23 participants per group, increased by 10% to 25 participants per group to account for incomplete data. The researchers purposively selected all participants for the experiment. Data were collected first from the control group and then from the experimental group using a mutual goal-setting program based on King’s Goal Attainment Theory, along with a demographic form,a 24-hour face-down behavior log, a visual acuity record, and a retinal reattachment record. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and a two-factor repeated measures ANOVA.
The experimental group had a mean number of face-down positioning hours equal to or greater than 16 hours, which was higher than that of the control group. When comparing the mean hours of face-down positioning at different time points, the experimental group demonstrated significantly higher means on postoperative days 1-2, 6-7, and 13-14 (F = 93.39, p < .05).Within the experimental group, the mean hours of face-down positioning one month before surgery were significantly different from those on postoperative days 1-2 (t = .79, p < .05), 6-7(t = .94, p < .05), and 13-14 (t = .88, p < .05). Additionally, the mean hours on postoperative days 1-2 were significantly different from those on days 6-7 (t = .63, p < .05) and 13-14(t = .43, p < .05). However, there was no significant difference between days 6-7 and 13-14.The experimental group also showed significantly better visual acuity one month after surgery than at 6-7 days (t = 0.10, p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups. Furthermore, the percentage of patients with successful retinal reattachment after surgery was higher in the experimental group than in the control group. This research recommends that nurses adopt a mutual goal-setting approach with patients before and after surgery, focusing on maintaining the face-down posture after gas-injection retinal detachment surgery to improve outcomes. Follow-up care should be extended to 3-6 months, including studies on patients' post-surgery quality of life. A program to set behavioral goals for face-down posture in patients with silicone oil injections is suggested to reduce reoperation rates. Future research should investigate factors such as body weight, retinal detachment location, and diabetes that may influence face-down posture.
Keywords: Clinical outcomes, Face-down positioning, Mutual goal setting, Retinal detachment,Retinal detachment surgery with gas tamponade
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในรามาธิบดีพยาบาลสาร ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสาร หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่หรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ใด จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากรามาธิบดีพยาบาลสารก่อนเท่านั้น
References
World Health Organization. Fact sheets: visual impairment and blindness [monograph on theInternet].2014. [cited 2019 Jun 4]. Available from: www.who.int.
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Performance report of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists of Thailand for the year 2018. Bangkok: The Royal College of Ophthalmologists; 2018.
Suwanpimolkul A. Complications after cataract surgery 2 [Internet]. Isoptik Individual Progressive Lens Center;2022 [cited 2024 Jun 20]. Available from: https://www.isoptik.com/th/article/eyecare/485.
Akkarapipatkul K. (2006). Eye symptoms in physical diseases, part 2. In: Wongkittirak S, Khamphithak K,editors. Textbook of Ophthalmology. Bangkok: Phimdee;2006. p. 152-63.
Songwatthananyuth P. Role of nurse for caring retinal detachment patients. Journal of Nursing and Health Science Research. 2020;12(2):189-201. (in Thai)
Kusaba K, Tsuboi K, Handa T, Shiraki Y, Kataoka T,Kamei M. Evaluation of adjustable postoperative position after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(9):4231.
American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2021-2022 Basic and clinical science course, Section 12: Retina and vitreous. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2021.
Noyudom A. (2018). Care of patients with face-down position after inserting gas in the vitreous cavity.Ramathibodi Nursing Journal. 2018;24(3):239-48. (in Thai)
Lawanasakol S. The effectiveness of information-motivation-behavioral skills Program on face down positioning in post operation of vitreous and retina surgery and gas tamponade. Region11 Medical Journal. 2019;3(33):581-8. (in Thai)
Kim AY, Hwang S, Kang SW, Shin SY, Chang WH, Kim SJ, Noh H. A structured exercise to relieve musculoskeletal pain caused by face-down posture after retinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2021;11:22074.
Takenami T, Tanaka K, Suzuki T, Hiruma H, Ikeda T,Sugimura K. Increase in intraoperative intraocular pressure in the prone position. Spine Surg Relat Res.2024;8(4):458-65. doi:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0263.
Eaton J, Johnson R. Coaching successfully. London:Dorling Kindersley; 2001.
Wilson SL, Powell GE, Brock D, Thwaites H. Behavioural differences between patients who emerged from vegetative state and those who did not. Brain Inj. 1996;10(7):509-16. doi: 10.1080/026990596124223.
Schick T, Heimann H, Schaub F. Retinal detachment part 1-epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics,diagnostic approach. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd.2020;237(12):1479-91. doi: 10.1055/a- 1243-1363.
Finn AP, Sternberg P Jr. Considering the patient, surgeon,and health care system in the timing of retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023;7(5):373-4. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2023.02.012.
King IM. A theory for nursing: Systems, concepts, process.New York: Wiley; 1981.
Chayarut P, Roojanavech S, Chatdokmaiprai K. The effects of health risk communication program among diabetic retinopathy patients in a community Samut Sakhon Province. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses.2021;20(3):206-17. (in Thai)
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3:A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social,behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods.2007;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
Brooke P, Bullock R. Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage. Int JGeriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14(11):936-40.
Aree-Ue S, Youngcharoen P. The 6 item cognitive function test-Thai version: Psychometric property testing.Ramathibodi Nursing Journal. 2020;26(2):188-202.(in Thai)
Pasu S, Bell L, Zenasni Z, Lanz D, Simmonds IA,Thompson A, et al. Facedown positioning following surgery for large full-thickness macular hole. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(7):725–30. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0987.
Timothy D, Mutanga O, Ismail R. Quantifying aboveground biomass in African environments: a review of the trade-offs between sensor estimation accuracy and costs. Trop Ecol. 2016;57(3):393-405.
Rao X, Wang NK, Chen YP, Hwang YS, Chuang LH, Liu IC, et al. Outcomes of outpatient fluid-gas exchange for open macular hole after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol.2013;156(2):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.031.
Shaheen AR, Iyer PG, Flynn HW, Yannuzzi NA. Retinal displacement following repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2023 May-Aug;16(2):205–10. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_187_22.
Schöneberger V, Tahmaz V, Menghesha L, Lüke JN,Cursiefen C, Schaub F, et al. Retinal detachment rates after uncomplicated dmek versus cataract surgery combined (Triple-) DMEK. Cornea. 2024. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003554.