A comparison of results between formal teaching and normal teaching in uncontrolled diabetes patient

Authors

  • มยุรี คชนาม ศูนย์สุขภาพชุมชนเมืององค์การบริหารส่วนจังหวัดสุราษฎร์ธานี โรงพยาบาลสุราษฎร์ธานี

Keywords:

Key Word : Formal teaching and Normal teaching program, uncontrolled diabetes patients.

Abstract

Abstract

This a quasi experimental research is aimed to compare  laboratory  examination, knowledge and practice   before and after  formal   and  normal  teaching  in both groups and between groups. The samples are uncontrolled diabetes patients  who were drawn by purposive sampling, they are 1)  no complication of diabetes patient with  CKD  lower stage3 and non  CVD CAD  2.  FBS/DTX ≥130 mg/dl or HbA1C≥7%  at least 2 times. The amount of  formal   and  normal  teaching  is 29:14  persons. There are  2 parts of research instruments, 1. An experimental  tools such as 1.1) handbooks of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus 1.2) record form of  knowledge monitoring 1.3) record form of cue to action. 2. The  record form of a comparison of results  between formal   and  normal  teaching  group which are verified by and experts and reliability test .The cronbach  alpha coefficient  of knowledge is 0.832. The research is employed  during 22 May to 14 July,2017. The descriptive statistic and  inferential statistics such as Independent t test and paired t test are used to analyze the data. The results are as follows:

                The sample in the formal teaching group has statistically decreased on average of FBS and HbA1c  after an experiment , slightly decrease of eGFR and increase of knowledge that has not statistically different. In normal teaching group, the average of  FBS  has higher than before the experiment. However, HbA1c , Creatinine and  eGFR are nearby . The mean score of  knowledge and self care practice in before an experiment are higher than after experiment, but has not statistically different.The comparison between groups, its show that the FBS and HbA1c in the formal teaching group are statistically  significant lower than the normal teaching group.

The recommendations are  a support of formal teaching  together with target, aim cooperate in patient treatment and  monitoring of self care  for confidence , learning  and correct appropriate  apply in self context. To get  control and treatment of target for complication reducing, expenditure costs and high quality of life are targets. The formal teaching can be applied in others non chronic disease.

Key Word : Formal teaching and Normal  teaching  program, uncontrolled diabetes patients.

References

เอกสารอ้างอิง
Himathongkham,T. Ratchatanawin,R. & Ningsanon,T. (2014). Complete knowledge of diabetes mellitus . (the 3rd edition ): Bangkok. Patwitthay Co., Ltd. (in Thai)
Absuwan,N. Issues campaign messages for World Diabetes Mellitus Day .(2015). [Retrieved March11,2017] from : http://www.thaincd.com/document.doc.
The Free Encyclopedia Wikipedia. [Retrieved March26,2017] from https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Kanchanaphibunwong ,A.(2016). Disease situation report NCDs: (kick off to the goals). Nonthaburi : International Health Policy Development Agency. (in Thai)
Tangsuwankun,C. (2017). Social support theory. [Retrieved March26,2017] from : https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/470623. (in Thai)
Diabetes Association of Thailand.(2014). Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2014. Bangkok : Aroon Printing Limited Partnership. (in Thai)
Powwattana , A.(1994).The Effectiveness of Participation in Self-Help Group on Self-Care in Patients with Essential Hypertension at Chiangraiprachanukrur Hospital, Chiangrai Province. Master. Public Health (Public Health Nursing). Mahidol University. Bangkok .(in Thai)
Benjamin,S Bloom.(1986). Learning for mastery. Evaluation comment.Center for the study of instruction program. University of California at Los Angeles ; 1986: Vol 2:47-62.
Wongsunoparat.B., Ngarmukos,C ., Saibuathong,N.(2008). Glycemic Control in Persons with Diabetes after Attending a Group Educational Program for Diabetes Self-Management [Retrieved March14,2560] from https://med.mahidol.ac.th/nursing/jns/DocumentLink/2551/issue_03/02.pdf.
Ovatakanont P.(2011).The Outcome of Diabetes Care and Factors Associated With Poor Glycemic Control among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Saimun Hospital.Srinagarind Medical Journal. (in Thai)
Kanglee, K. (2014). Factors Associated With Glycemic Control Among People With Type 2 DiabetesMellitus at Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. Volume 15 No.3 (Sep - Dec) 2014:256-268.(in Thai)
Sriasadaporn,P.(2010). Diabetes Education for Self-Management . (the 2nd edition ). Bangkok : Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand . (in Thai)
Jiraphongsuwan,A & Sawengphol,P (2011). Factors related to self care behavior of patients with diabetes in Lardlumkaew Hospital, Lardlumkaew ,pathumthani.Journal of Public Health and Development . (in Thai)

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

คชนาม ม. (2020). A comparison of results between formal teaching and normal teaching in uncontrolled diabetes patient. Journal of Health Research and Innovation, 3(2), 15–24. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhri/article/view/247552

Issue

Section

Research Articles