Secondary data analysis of upper limb motor deficit proportion and the relation with hand dominance in individuals with stroke

Main Article Content

ขนิษฐา จิตรอารี
Watanya Pattayanun
Phatcharamon Wangsirikul
พิมพกานต์ นันตะชัย
Pagamas Piriyaprasarth
Supaluk Pormsorn

Abstract

Background: Only a few numbers of studies assessed upper limb motor deficit in the proximal and distal part and the relationship between the degree of motor deficit post-stroke and hand dominance is also scarce.
Objective: To study the ratio of upper limb motor deficit in patients with stroke and the relationship between the degree of motor deficit and hand dominance.
Methods: Secondary data analysis of physical therapy records. The data of patients with stroke who attended a physical therapy center in Thailand between 2017 to 2019 were accessed including general information, stroke onset, and upper limb motor subscale score of the Fugl
Meyer Assessment (FMA UE). The FMA UE score was further divided into 3 subgroups according to the severity (mild, moderate, and severe) as well as the motor deficit in the proximal and distal part of the upper limb. The ratio and odds ratio were analyzed.
Results: Complete data were taken from 176 patients with stroke. Most patients were categorized as severe motor deficit (45.5%), with the deficit in both proximal and distal parts (58.5%), and weakness on their dominant hand (54.3%). The distal part was more severe than the proximal part. The odds ratio for the dominant side weakness and the degree of motor deficit was 2.1 (95% CI = 1.1, 3.8).
Conclusion: Most patients with stroke presented with severe upper limb motor deficit and affected both proximal and distal parts, yet more severe motor deficit in the distal part. Weakness on the dominant hand was correlated with motor deficit.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
จิตรอารี ข, Pattayanun W, Wangsirikul P, นันตะชัย พ, Piriyaprasarth P, Pormsorn S. Secondary data analysis of upper limb motor deficit proportion and the relation with hand dominance in individuals with stroke. Thai J Phys Ther [internet]. 2022 Dec. 13 [cited 2026 Jan. 2];44(3):223-37. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjpt/article/view/255083
Section
Research Articles

References

Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003; 34(9): 2181-6.

Srisoparb W, Nualnetr N, Sommanochai K, Karinta N, Charungthanakij P. Upper limb functional ability of individuals with chronic stroke in communities of naresuan university hospital. Thai J Phys Ther. 2019; 41(2): 60-74.

Khowin S, Posawang P, Polngam K. Effectiveness robotic assisted therapy combines conventional therapy on upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke with hemiparesis. J Dept Med Ser. 2018; 43(4): 54-60.

Banjai RM, Freitas SMSF, Silva FPD, Alouche SR. Individuals’ perception about upper limb influence on participation after stroke: an observational study. Topics Stroke Rehabil. 2018; 25(3): 174-9.

Lieshout ECCV, van de Port IG, Dijkhuizen RM, Visser-Meily JMA. Does upper limb strength play a prominent role in health-related quality of life in stroke patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation? Topics Stroke Rehabil. 2020; 27(7): 525-33.

Hanna E, Janssen H, Crowfoot G, Mason G, Vyslysel G, Sweetapple A, et al. Participation, fear of falling and upper limb impairment are associated with high sitting time in people with stroke. Occup Ther Health Care. 2019; 33(2): 181-96.

Tyson SF, Chillala J, Hanley M, Selley AB, Tallis RC. Distribution of weakness in the upper and lower limbs post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28(11): 715-9.

Beebe JA, Lang CE. Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 119(9): 2074-85.

Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, Conroy SS, Sorkin JD, Whitall J, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(3): 456 62.

Woodbury ML, Velozo CA, Richards LG, Duncan PW. Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94(8): 1572 33.

Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, Rose DK, Hershberg J, Correa A, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 2011; 42(2): 427-32.

Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016; 47(6): e98--e169.

Thompson-Butel AG, Lin G, Shiner CT, McNulty PA. Comparison of three tools to measure improvements in upper-limb function with post stroke therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015; 29(4): 341--8.

Wongphaet P, Suksathien R, Watchareeudomkarn W, Inta P, Hantaseema P, Phantikaew D, et al. Correlation between hemiplegic arm function assessment with sensibletab robotic device and Fugl-Meyer scale in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Thai Rehabil Med. 2016; 26(1): 8-12.

Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994; 25(6): 1181--8.

Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Sahrmann SA, Dromerick AW. Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20(4): 444--54.

Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20(3): 380-9.

Rinehart JK, Singleton RD, Adair JC, Sadek JR, Haaland KY. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke. 2009; 40(2): 545-50.

Voos M, Ribeiro do Valle L. Comparative study on the relationship between stroke hemisphere and functional evolution in right-handed individuals. J Phys Ther. 2008; 12: 113-20.

Nam HU, Huh JS, Yoo JN, Hwang JM, Lee BJ, Min YS, et al. Effect of dominant hand paralysis on quality of life in patients with subacute stroke. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014; 38(4): 450-457.

Qian Q, Nam C, Guo Z, Huang Y, Hu X, Ng SC, et al. Distal versus proximal - an investigation on different supportive strategies by robots for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16(1): 64.

Lee YY, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chen CK. Proximal Fugl-Meyer assessment scores predict clinically important upper limb improvement after 3 stroke rehabilitative interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96(12): 2137-44.

Akakul T. Research methods in behaviral sciences and social sciences. Ubon Ratchathani: Witthaya offset printing; 2006. (In Thai)

Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen Cl, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009; 40(4): 1386-91.

Seephim B, Srisoparb W, Nualnetr NJSMJ. Upper limb functions and complications of hemiplegic patients with chronic stroke in the

community. Thai J Phys Ther. 2020; 35(1): 51-8.

Junmee C, Siriwachirachai P, Chompoonimit A, Thaweewannakij T, Chanavirut R, Nualnetr N. Health status of patients with stroke in ubolratana district, khon kaen province: International Classification of Functioning, disability and health-based assessments. Thai J Phys Ther. 2021; 43(1): 45-63.

Nakashima N, Miyasaka H, Kando I, Iwata K, Uematsu H, Yamamura C, et al. The relationship between proximal function of the upper extremity on paralyzed side and upper extremity skill in daily life of subacute stroke patients. Jpn J Compr Rehabili Sci. 2017; 8: 44-50.

Nathan P, Smith M, Deacon P. Vestibulospinal, reticulospinal and descending propriospinal nerve fibres in man. Brain. 1996; 119(6): 1809--33.

Turton A, Wroe S, Trepte N, Fraser C, Lemon R. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990; 101(4): 316-28.

Alawieh A, Zhao J, Feng W. Factors affecting post-stroke motor recovery: implications on neurotherapy after brain injury. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 340: 94-101.

Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(11): 1629-37.

Lee KB, Kim JS, Hong BY, Lim SH. Clinical recovery from stroke lesions and related outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2017; 37: 79-82.

Jang SH, Chang MC. Motor outcomes of patients with a complete middle cerebral artery territory infarct. Neural Regen Res. 2013; 8(20): 1892-97.

Worakijthamrongchai T. Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Thai Stroke Soc. 2017; 16(3): 5-13.

Kasemsap N. Update treatment in acute ischemic stroke. J North-Eastern Neurosci. 2016;11(1):53-8.