Relationship between Learning Styles, Learning Achievement, and Nursing and Midwifery National Licensing Examination of Nursing Graduates from Boromarajonani College among Nursing Udonthani

Main Article Content

จิตตานันท์ ศรีสุวรรณ์
พิมพ์วลัญช์ อายุวัฒน์
ปรานต์ศศิ เหล่ารัตน์ศรี
อรวรรยา ภูมิศรีแก้ว

Abstract

The aim of this descriptive correlation research was to explore the relationship between learning styles, learning achievement, and the Nursing and Midwifery National Licensing Examination. The data were collected from 119 nursing graduates from the Borramarajonnani College of Nursing, Udonthani, Thailand. The Felder and Solomon Index (ILS) questionnaire was adopted for data collection in the first semester of Academic Year 2018. The ILS consists of four groups: processing information (active-reflective), perceiving information (sensing-intuitive), receiving information (visual-verbal), and understanding information (sequential-global). The Chi-square test was used for data analysis. Overall, nursing students presented a well-balanced mix learning styles. The top three highest used styles were sensory, visual, and active (94.11%, 90.75%, and 73.10%, respectively). Interestingly, active and sequence learning styles were significantly related to the licensing examination result. Also, learning achievement was significantly related to the licensing result. However, all types of learning styles were not significantly related to learning achievement. In conclusion, despite different learning styles among nursing graduates, a well-balanced mix of learning styles were addressed. As a result, the blended teaching methods such as case study, practice, and simulation-based learning should be used more for enhancing the achievement of learning and the outcome of the license examination. Additionally, further study of the factors that are releated to the nursing and midwifery licensing examination outcomes and learning achievement among nursing graduates should be explored further.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
ศรีสุวรรณ์ จ, อายุวัฒน์ พ, เหล่ารัตน์ศรี ป, ภูมิศรีแก้ว อ. Relationship between Learning Styles, Learning Achievement, and Nursing and Midwifery National Licensing Examination of Nursing Graduates from Boromarajonani College among Nursing Udonthani. NJPH (วารสาร พ.ส.) [Internet]. 2019 Dec. 20 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];29(3):144-55. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tnaph/article/view/230792
Section
บทความวิจัย

References

1. Janepanish VP, Disorntatiwat P. Learning style preferences of nursing students at Ramathibodi school of nursing, faculty of medicine, Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol university. NJPH. 2015;25(1):70-82. (in Thai).

2. Tammabood M. Learning style. [Internet]. 2009[cited 2018 Sep 9]. Available from: http://portal.edu.chula.ac.th/girl/blog/view.php?Bid=1245038152800790. (in Thai).

3. VARK Learn Limited. The VARK modalities. [Internet]. 2018[cited 2018 Dec 9]. Available from: http://vark-learn.com/introduction-to-vark/the-vark-modalities/.

4. McLeod S. Kolb’s learning styles and expereintial learning cycle. [Internet]. 2017[cited 2018 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html

5. Felder RM, Siverman LK. Learning styles and teaching styles. [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2018 Dec 1 Available from: https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/drive/1QP6kBI1i QmpQbTXL-08HSl0PwJ5BYnZW/1988-LS-plus-note.pdf

6. Felder RM, Solomon BA. Index of learning styles questionnaire. North Carolina State Uniersity. [Internet]. 2002. [cited 2018 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.webtools.ncsu. edu/learningstyles/

7. Namakankham A, Parkpoom P. The learning style of nursing students at faculty of nursing, Chiang Mai University. [Disserttion]; Chiang Mai University;2000. (in Thai).

8. Wattanakul B, Ngamkham S, Ngamwongwan G. Differences in learning preference performance of nursing students. JHR. 2016;10(1):54-61. (in Thai).

9. Dalmolin AC, Mackeivicz GAO, Pochapski MT, Pilatti GL, SanTOS A. Learning styles preferences and E-learning experience of undergraduate dental students. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2018;47(3):175-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.05118.

10. Sanboonsong P. Learning styles of undergraduate nursing students of Pathumthani university. trcnj. [Internet]. 2017[cited 2018 Dec 10]. 10(1):154-64. Available from: https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index. php/trcnj/article/view/96901. (in Thai).

11. Chumpeeruang S, Kontha JJ. Relationships among personal factors, learning styles and Academic achievement of undergraduated nursing students. JHR. 2010;4(5):21-8. (in Thai).

12. Wongrattanarak W, Chittayanunt K. The learning styles of bachelor program nursing students at Boromarajonnani College of Nursing, Chakriraj. Jobcnm. 2013;19(2):60-72. (in Thai).

13. Dechawongse S, Gomaratut S. Learning styles in Foreign language learning of undergrade students in Thailand. Research paper of Dhurakij Pundit university. [Internet]. 2016[cited 2018 Dec 10]. Available from: http://libdoc.dpu.ac.th/research/ 159571.pdf. (in Thai).

14. Kunaviktikul W, Klunlin A, Chontawan R, Athaseri S. Factors related to the results of Nursing and Obstetric License Test. TJONC. [Internet]. 2012[cited 2018 Dec 10].27(3):11-28. Available from: https://tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ TJONC/article/view/5437. (in Thai).

15. Nuchsutam W, Somboon L, Tongwas T, Keawkajorn S, Siririth W. Factors related to the result of the License Examination of Graduates faculty of Nursing Chiangrai College. cmunursing. 2013;40 Suppl1:S61-72. (in Thai).

16. Kongkar R, Chareonkitkarn V, Tosuksri W, Sareewiwatthana P. Factor affecting the result of Nursing Licensure Examination among bachelor graduates from faculty of nursing, Mahidol University. J Nurs Sci. 2013; 30(3):82-91. (in Thai).